Hi Teodor/Bruce,
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 05:48:25PM +0300, Teodor MICU wrote:
> I've been disappointed at first to read that so many approve this
> "rolling" implementation that in fact is just "c-u-t", constantly
> usable testing [1]! Outside of the freeze period it doesn't really
> matter and on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: NeuroDebian Team
* Package name: cmtk
Version : 1.7.0
Upstream Author : Torsten Rohlfing
* URL : http://www.nitrc.org/projects/cmtk/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : The Computational Morpho
**
Please reply to me directly (or CC me on replies) as I am not
currently subscribed to debian-devel.
**
I recently became a father of twins and, as such, have less time to work
on packages than I used to. While I do plan on keeping some of my
packages, there are others I'm interested
On May 9, 2011 08:48:25 am Teodor MICU wrote:
> To conclude, "unstable-next" suite (or some other name [2]) is a
> requirement for "rolling" [3].
>
> Thanks
>
> [2] but not "experimental"
...unless the nature of experimental is changed, and its current function
replaced with PPA's?
- Bruce
-
**
Please reply to me directly (or CC me on replies) as I am not
currently subscribed to debian-devel.
**
I'm looking for someone who might like to take over the icu package.
This is ICU4C (C/C++), not to be confused with ICU4J (Java), which is a
separate package maintained by someone el
Thomas Koch dijo [Sun, May 08, 2011 at 10:09:16AM +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to hear your opinions about an idea and propose a discussion about
> it
> on Debconf:
>
> a) Dream: Debian could publish quality metrics about the packaged software in
> a machine readable format.
>
> b) Software qua
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francisco Manuel Garcia Claramonte
* Package name: letodms
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Author : Uwe Steinmann
Markus Westphal
* URL : http://www.letodms.com/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: PHP
De
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 04:59:39PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:45:41 -0400, Marvin Renich wrote:
>
> > * David Paleino [110509 04:19]:
> > > On Mon, 9 May 2011 11:12:53 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > >
> > > > /etc may include only _static_ configuration. What you have
On Mon, 9 May 2011 16:13:16 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 11:29:07AM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 May 2011 10:21:21 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > I seem to remember newer NM versions (in experimental) have changed the
> > > default to be the other way round,
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 04:59:39PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:45:41 -0400, Marvin Renich wrote:
>
> > * David Paleino [110509 04:19]:
> > > On Mon, 9 May 2011 11:12:53 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > >
> > > > /etc may include only _static_ configuration. What you have
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 11:29:07AM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2011 10:21:21 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I seem to remember newer NM versions (in experimental) have changed the
> > default to be the other way round, on the basis that network connections are
> > system-wide, so
On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:45:41 -0400, Marvin Renich wrote:
> * David Paleino [110509 04:19]:
> > On Mon, 9 May 2011 11:12:53 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >
> > > /etc may include only _static_ configuration. What you have is variable
> > > state which belongs in /var. It's no different from a da
> On 09/05/2011 12:51, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 09.05.2011 11:34, schrieb Vincent Danjean:
>>> RFC 4941 is a problem if you want to use to use IPv6 and proxy NDP,
>>> at least until the kernel allow to proxy a network instead of hosts.
>>> This does not seem for now:
>>> http://marc.i
On Mon, 09 May 2011, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
> > We've been trying to avoid that kind of bad practice here in Brazil,
> > through an effort to get ISPs to undertand you do NOT issue /64 to
> > clients in the various NANOG-like (locally called "GTER") encounters
> >
2011/5/5 Raphael Hertzog :
> On Thu, 05 May 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> Also, having the unstable-next suite you've mention would tight more the
>> deployment of rolling to other project mechanisms, while the rest of the
>> proposal enjoyed much more decoupling.
>
> There's no reason why thi
* David Paleino [110509 04:19]:
> On Mon, 9 May 2011 11:12:53 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> > /etc may include only _static_ configuration. What you have is variable
> > state which belongs in /var. It's no different from a database, or dpkg's
> > status data.
>
> Static IPs, DNS servers and
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:40:47PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 06:09:17PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Also the libc6-msp430-dev:all and libc6-dev:msp430 packages will both be
> >> using /usr/inlcude// and already trigger the
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 12:51:30PM +0200, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
> Also, wouldn't using DHCPv6 solve this problem as well?
The way to go is DHCPv6-PD.
Bastian
--
Our missions are peaceful -- not for conquest. When we do battle, it
is only because we have no choice.
-- Kirk, "The
Hi,
Am 09.05.2011 11:34, schrieb Vincent Danjean:
> On 08/05/2011 17:33, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> i currently wonder if Debian should implement RFC 4941 as default for
>> wheezy.
> [...]
>> I would like to hear other developers meanings to this issue, before
>> proposing this as release goal f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sylvestre Ledru
* Package name: scilab-jims
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Calite Denizet
* URL : http://forge.scilab.org/index.php/p/JIMS/
* License : CeCILL
Programming Lang: C, Java & Scilab
Description : B
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> So, my experience with #624819 was basically this. The bug was
> reported, followed by an NMU upload about 45 minutes after the bug was
> initially reported. Please don't misunderstand. I appreciate that the
> submitter was proactive. However, emailing the patch fir
On 09/05/2011 11:53, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 09 May 2011, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> On 08/05/2011 17:33, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> Note: proxy NDP is required when your provider gives you a flat /64
>> (ie its router is in your /64, generally prefix::1 and it tries to talk
>
On 09/05/2011 12:51, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 09.05.2011 11:34, schrieb Vincent Danjean:
>> RFC 4941 is a problem if you want to use to use IPv6 and proxy NDP,
>> at least until the kernel allow to proxy a network instead of hosts.
>> This does not seem for now:
>> http://marc.info/?l=li
On Mon, 9 May 2011 11:55:39 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> Aside from privileges wicd needs or has to write in /etc, how does it
> handle read-only / (including /etc)? Does it fall back to /var?
No.
I haven't tried, but it should be able to connect without a writable /(etc)
(it already uses /var
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 10:43:29PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> This isn't a bug in e2fsprogs; e2fsprogs has absolutely nothing to do
> with mounting the file system.
>
> Debian simply doesn't support the mount options for the root file
> system in /etc/fstab having any effect on how the root file sys
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:39:07AM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> I'm writing this mail to gather comments about a serious bug I received some
> time ago, for which I haven't yet had time to make a proper fix. The bug is
> #612918, against wicd, "Uses /etc/wicd/wireless-settings.c
On Mon, 09 May 2011, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> On 08/05/2011 17:33, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > i currently wonder if Debian should implement RFC 4941 as default for
> > wheezy.
> [...]
> > I would like to hear other developers meanings to this issue, before
> > proposing this as release goal for
On 08/05/2011 17:33, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> i currently wonder if Debian should implement RFC 4941 as default for
> wheezy.
[...]
> I would like to hear other developers meanings to this issue, before
> proposing this as release goal for wheezy.
RFC 4941 is a problem if you want to use to use
Il 03/05/2011 18:44, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
> Out of curiosity, and given http://debdelta.debian.net has been around
> for a long while now and is used (according to my exchanges with you)
> regularly, do you have a plan for integration into debian.*org* proper?
>
I would like to. But so fa
On Mon, 9 May 2011 10:21:21 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 09 May 2011 at 09:39:07 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > I took a look at how NetworkManager handles that: it stores configuration
> > using gconf, so it's not really comparable
>
> NM can go either way - it'll use the current user
On Mon, 09 May 2011 at 09:39:07 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> I took a look at how NetworkManager handles that: it stores configuration
> using
> gconf, so it's not really comparable
NM can go either way - it'll use the current user's gconf for connections
that are not "shared with other users",
On Mon, 9 May 2011 11:12:53 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> /etc may include only _static_ configuration. What you have is variable
> state which belongs in /var. It's no different from a database, or dpkg's
> status data.
Static IPs, DNS servers and WEP/WPA keys for a given wireless network are
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:39:07AM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> I'm writing this mail to gather comments about a serious bug I received some
> time ago, for which I haven't yet had time to make a proper fix. The bug is
> #612918, against wicd, "Uses /etc/wicd/wireless-settings.c
On Saturday 07 May 2011 15:14:59 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 07 May 2011, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > This works both ways. If a NMUer uploaded my package without a delay
> > and without a good reason[0], I want to be able to yell at him „you
> > are a jerk (according to Developers Referenc
]] Enrico Weigelt
| Autoconf (w/o automake) offers no means to tell additional m4
| include pathes (eg. in configure.ac), so that just calling
| autoreconf (w/o any additional parameters!) can do a full
| regeneration all on its own.
What's wrong with the suggestion in
http://lists.debian.org/de
On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:39:07 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> ...
Gah, I clicked "Reply" instead of "Compose". Sorry everybody.
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.l
Hello everybody,
I'm writing this mail to gather comments about a serious bug I received some
time ago, for which I haven't yet had time to make a proper fix. The bug is
#612918, against wicd, "Uses /etc/wicd/wireless-settings.conf as state file".
My opinion is that wireless networks with some kin
>> As we have received no notice of errors and as we also do not see
>> anything bad ourself, I just activated the new generator for the
>> archive. Starting with the next dinstall run in a few minutes all
>> Packages and Sources files[2] will be generated using the new tool.
> is that a related br
38 matches
Mail list logo
