CPAN bug: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=70544
On 28/08/11 06:19, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 10:08:55PM +0100, Nicholas Bamber a écrit :
>>
>> * Package name: libdebian-copyright-perl
>> Version : 0.1
>> Upstream Author : Nicholas Bamber
>> * URL
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 08:44:41PM -0400, Timothy Stotts wrote:
> /proc/config.gz reveals that SYSVIPC is indeed compiled into the Linux
> kernel of the Debian system.
The Debian kernels don't include support for /proc/config.gz.
> How can I diagnose the program on the Debian system?
strace. Als
On Sat, 2011-08-27 at 20:44 -0400, Timothy Stotts wrote:
> I am using ftok(), shmget(), shmat() to obtain a small quantity of
> shared memory for the application. As root, the shmat() function
> succeeds on the embedded system. However, on the Debian system the
> shmat() function returns -1 with an
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 01:11:40AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>ntfs-3g
I was under the impression that ntfs-3g was a FUSE implementation, which
should in theory work on kFreeBSD too. But don't take my word for it :-)
--
The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Egger
* Package name: herbstluftwm
Version : 0.0~git
Upstream Author : Thosten Wißmann thorsten-wissmann.de>
* URL : http://wwwcip.cs.fau.de/~re06huxa/herbstluftwm/
* License : Simplified BSD
Programming Lang:
Hi,
I am looking to make OS for mobile phones on Linux platform. Can Debian be
of any use?
Regards,
Suresh.R
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 17:20:17 +0530
Suresh Ramanujam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking to make OS for mobile phones on Linux platform. Can Debian be
> of any use?
Don't see why not but it depends on the amount of storage available on
device and what functionality needs to be supported with software
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Suresh Ramanujam wrote:
> I am looking to make OS for mobile phones on Linux platform. Can Debian be
> of any use?
A Debian derivative (Maemo) has been shipped by Nokia on the N900
phone, the N950 phone (developer only) and will probably be shipped on
the N9 when
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 08:44:41PM -0400, Timothy Stotts wrote:
> on the Debian system the shmat() function returns -1 with an error code of
> EACCES, indicating permission denied. The embedded system does not have
> shm_open(), otherwise I would use that.
Other folks in this thread provided bett
* Michael Tautschnig [2011-08-24 14:31 +0200]:
> > Its not any header package: dkms needs the _appropriate_ header
> > package matching the installed kernel package. If
> > linux-image-2.6.39-1-amd64 is installed, then dkms needs
> > linux-headers-2.6.39-1-amd64. If linux-image-3.0-1-amd64 is
> >
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors
wrote:
> Miguel Landaeta writes:
>> You could check at http://vasks.debian.org/~nomadium-guest/debian/unstable/,
>
> should I ask Antoine (from upstream) to link to these packages or is it
> too early?
They work for me between two workstation
Thank you Ian,
could you make it world rX (so it would appear on http://git. and becomes
available through git://), and add me to the group just in case:
$> cd /git/autopkgtest/
-bash: cd: /git/autopkgtest/: Permission denied
total 20
4 0001-addressing-the-rename-of-matlab-into-matlab-support.pat
reassign 637058 wnpp
severity 637058 normal
retitle 637058 O: gclcvs -- GNU Common Lisp compiler, CVS snapshot
thanks
Hi,
Since the original maintainer has not argued against this and is not (to
my knowledge) on vacation, I am hereby orphaning gclcvs (and gclcvs-doc).
The full description of the
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:38:05PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The new autopkgtest-devel list is now open for business at
>http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autopkgtest-devel
> If you're interested in autopkgtest please subscribe to it.
> I'm going to stop sending emails
Hi!
Niels Thykier writes:
> If no one picks this package up soon (within 14 days give or take) I
> will push for its removal on the grounds that it is unmaintained and RC
> buggy.
Fortunately there's a good alternative here as this is a snapshotting
package for software actually maintained wel
On 27 August 2011 06:38, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> And I do think it is at least a serious bug for libgpg-error-dev to drop its
> static lib when there are rdepends that require it (dar). But I am not sure
> about this one.
The documentation says "makes unrelated software on the syste
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Brian May wrote:
> On 27 August 2011 06:38, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > And I do think it is at least a serious bug for libgpg-error-dev to drop its
> > static lib when there are rdepends that require it (dar). But I am not sure
> > about this one.
>
> The documen
TL;DR: I think that we should have a discussion about the respective
roles & responsibilities of maintainers and porters with regard to
porting.
Release team, there's a question for you regarding ruby1.9.1 in the last
paragraph.
Hi,
First, I'd like to say that I'm very proud of the
18 matches
Mail list logo
