Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME

2013-10-28 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2013-10-27, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote: * Some people say this means it needs systemd running as pid=1, same say it doesn't. Am still confused here. The facts seems to be that logind/systemd in version 204 (the current one in debian) doesn't need systemd as pid 1, but

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-28 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:57:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: I would not be opposed to changing the default for xfce for now, and reverting it if gnome's improvements make it a better choice. OK. I suggest that we *try* that for now. If we try, what will be the criteria for assessing

Bug#728085: ITP: pyfftw -- A pythonic wrapper around FFTW, the FFT library, presenting a unified interface for all the supported transforms.

2013-10-28 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ghislain Vaillant ghisv...@gmail.com * Package name: pyfftw Version : 0.9.2 Upstream Author : Henry Gomersall h...@kedevelopments.co.uk * URL : http://hgomersall.github.io/pyFFTW/ * License : GPL-3, some windows-specific

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-28 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org, 2013-10-25, 23:45: OpenRC has been waiting in the NEW queue (targeting experimental, as this is what it is right now: experimental!) for more than a month. It'd be nice if someone from the FTP master team could review it, so that at least others can try it.

Re: Proposal: s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-28 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le dimanche, 27 octobre 2013 08.49:59 Charles Plessy a écrit : I strongly recommend that the three current and former employees of Canonical refrain from voting: (…) Frankly, I think this is going too far. Either we trust them to do the right thing™ or we don't. In the first case, we should

Re: on bootstrapping ports (was: Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info))

2013-10-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 27/10/2013 16:30, Daniel Schepler a écrit : (To be honest, the Java packages are such a tangled mess that I've given up on trying to bootstrap that part of the archive for now -- and many of those do get pulled into the minimal set of ca. 1473 source packages I get with my criteria.)

Re: Jessie release goal: DNSSEC as default recursive resolver

2013-10-28 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sat, October 26, 2013 18:52, Ondřej Surý wrote: The safe default is still to rely on the organizational DNS resolvers as provided by DHCP or local manual configuration. we can adopt dnssec-trigger (https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/dnssec-trigger/) for such scenarios. I think it's

Re: [debian-mysql] MySQL.. no.. _I_ need your help!

2013-10-28 Thread Akhil Mohan
Hi Clint, I am Akhil Mohan, new to the list and eager to help everyone here in packaging latest releases of MySQL server. Amongst the points highlighted by you, I think packaging MySQL 5.6 would be one of the priorities and I would like to participate in bringing up quality packages for

Re: Imminent mass-bug-filing warning for multiarch:same bugs

2013-10-28 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jenny Hopkins hopkins.je...@gmail.com, 2013-10-25, 09:32: Please include me in replies to the list, at hopkins.je...@gmail.com. I'll be away for the coming week, and then will file the bugs if nobody has objected. Done. DIFFS IN changelog.Debian.gz:

Re: [debian-mysql] MySQL.. no.. _I_ need your help!

2013-10-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:32:23AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: As some of you may know, I've been doing the bulk of the package maintenance on the mysql package for a while now. It started as part of my day job with Canonical, but since leaving Canonical it has been more a labor of love for

Re: Please assume good faith

2013-10-28 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote: David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com writes: On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote: Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de writes: Lars Wirzenius liw at liw.fi writes: I write a backup

Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME

2013-10-28 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 07:12:21PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: (As far as I can tell this is the actual root of the problem, at least for this iteration of the argument: the fact that logind now requires systemd.) That's due to cgroups change. There seem to be 2 other potential implementations

Re: let's split the systemd binary package

2013-10-28 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:14:57AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: E.g. XFCE either wants ConsoleKit, or logind. If you look at ConsoleKit, you'll notice it is NOT maintained. XFCE *needs* neither and in fact the vast vast majority of users do not either. I check the spec files for Fedora,

Re: systemd effectively mandatory now due to GNOME

2013-10-28 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Brian May On 28 October 2013 07:52, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no wrote: - /lib/udev/rules.d/99-systemd.rules - udev rules that will be active on any system with /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd present (because of logind, this directory is not a good proxy for whether pid1 ==

Re: Jessie release goal: DNSSEC as default recursive resolver

2013-10-28 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:01:13PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Sat, October 26, 2013 18:52, Ondřej Surý wrote: we can adopt dnssec-trigger I think it's indeed very important that a default install uses the DHCP provided DNS-servers or locally configured resolvers, because in many

Bug#728111: ITP: papyrus -- DICOM compatible file format library

2013-10-28 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org * Package name: papyrus Version : 3.7.1 Upstream Author : UIN * URL : http://www.expasy.ch/UIN/html1/projects/papyrus/papyrus.html * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description

Re: Proposal: s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-28 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/27/2013 07:49 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: I strongly recommend that the three current and former employees of Canonical refrain from voting: not only because of the current circumstances, but also to make the case for the time a different conflict of interest will happen. I don't agree

Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-deb: a Git importer for Debian packages

2013-10-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Joey Hess writes (Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-deb: a Git importer for Debian packages): Note that you can use dgit clone any package without being a Debian developer. You only need an alioth account in order to dgit push. Sadly this is not true. The reason is that the information dgit needs is only

SD cards (was Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce)

2013-10-28 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Luca Capello luca at pca.it writes: My X60 (from late 2006) can not either, but IMHO the reason behind it that the SD reader it is not connected through the USB bus: = $ lspci | grep SD 15:00.2 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822 SD/SDIO/MMC/MS/MSPro Host Adapter (rev 18) Right, but

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Lucas Nussbaum leader at debian.org writes: I agree. I don't think that many substantial new arguments are going to be brought by waiting more on this topic. And it is clear that we have reached a point where not having clear guidance is severely hurting the project. I agree. I think that

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Thorsten Glaser writes (Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.): Finally, I believe strongly that the CTTE request is badly worded, because the decision on whether we require support for more than one (the “default”) init system must be decided either

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
you need something with big buttons that is finger-friendly, I'm surprised how much accuracy a capacitive multitouch mobile has when in touchscreen terms it is actually extremely poor (3-4mm) exacerbated by them not responding to nails (conductive), a trade-off for size and multitouch. Many

Re: Proposal: s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Charles Plessy writes (Re: Proposal: s have a GR about the init system): For the choice of an init system, the technical comittee is a typical example where conflict of interest disqualifies a large number of its members (3 current or former employees of Canonical). This has been also observed

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Neil McGovern
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:23:33PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Also, why have people been shying back from GRs like they are a plague? They are a good, and _the_, way to ask the people that make up Debian for their opinion. As someone else said in one of these threads: they don’t eat babies.

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:20:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Right. Whichever init system we pick, I do expect the next step to be to drop the requirement to maintain sysvinit backwards-compatibility; While I'm not sure from your mail whether you meant to suggest otherwise, I do think that

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Alexander Wirt
Wouter Verhelst schrieb am Monday, den 28. October 2013: On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:20:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Right. Whichever init system we pick, I do expect the next step to be to drop the requirement to maintain sysvinit backwards-compatibility; While I'm not sure from

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-28 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Stefano Zacchiroli zack at debian.org writes: *technical* decision is stupid. We really need to stop thinking that every single member of the Debian project, just because he/she is a DD, has a clue on every single technical matter that go on in the project. This means that you just don’t

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op 25-10-13 14:45, Adam Sampson schreef: Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com writes: We *could* just drop all the CD sets and be done with it, just keeping the netinst CD and the DVDs. Is that what people really want? As a longtime Debian user, that would suit me fine -- I've not done a

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
OK. I suggest that we *try* that for now. If we try, what will be the criteria for assessing whether the experiment has been successful (and hence worth keeping for Jessie) or a failure (and hence reverting it)? I think it should be considered that there has been much improvement upto

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-28 Thread Olaf Titz
Aeh, are you sure? I think you missed my point. I'm not involved with any init system, nor a Debian developer, yet by developing some random app and having it depend on a specific init system, I could (according to you) make that init system unsuitable for Debian? You would surely make _your

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-28 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/28/2013 06:28 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org, 2013-10-25, 23:45: OpenRC has been waiting in the NEW queue (targeting experimental, as this is what it is right now: experimental!) for more than a month. It'd be nice if someone from the FTP master team could review

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op 25-10-13 12:10, Thomas Goirand schreef: On 10/25/2013 07:52 AM, Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: Debian is the Universal OS, isn't it? Part of being a 'Universal OS' is being useful to as many people as possible, including people who don't

Re: let's split the systemd binary package

2013-10-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
E.g. XFCE either wants ConsoleKit, or logind. If you look at ConsoleKit, you'll notice it is NOT maintained. XFCE *needs* neither and in fact the vast vast majority of users do not either. I check the spec files for Fedora, Mageia, openSUSE. They all seem to require logind.

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op 25-10-13 15:43, Olav Vitters schreef: On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:41:23PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: There is no good reason other than that's the way GNOME has been written. So change the code and get GNOME to behave properly. Because you raise this again: - No maintenance on ConsoleKit

Re: Jessie release goal: DNSSEC as default recursive resolver

2013-10-28 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/28/2013 10:29 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:01:13PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Sat, October 26, 2013 18:52, Ondřej Surý wrote: we can adopt dnssec-trigger I think it's indeed very important that a default install uses the DHCP provided DNS-servers or

Re: let's split the systemd binary package

2013-10-28 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:58:16PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: How about Gentoo, Slackware, LFS and many many others? What's that? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op 25-10-13 19:32, Sune Vuorela schreef: Why not consolidate on shared code rather than having several bits providing the similar functionality for fairly simple tasks ? That's a (very!) fair argument, but there's nothing in that argument which means it absolutely totally *has* to be part of a

Re: Jessie release goal: DNSSEC as default recursive resolver

2013-10-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
So, as per the replies we've read, it seems that the only way to implement DNSSEC would be to first check if it works, and if it doesn't, fallback to the locally provided recursive DNS server. I still think a switch on/off (whatever the default) should be considered because if anyone decides

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Olav Vitters
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:23:33PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: (Also, do remember that any decisive outcome other than “support multiple ones including systemd” and “systemd-only” will need to lead to the removal of GNOME from Debian. I won’t miss it, but just saying.) Whatever CTTE and,

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-28 Thread Olav Vitters
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:41:47PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: That's a (very!) fair argument, but there's nothing in that argument which means it absolutely totally *has* to be part of a pid1 Most of systemd is not in pid1. This was explained by a blog references on debian-devel a while ago.

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
since that will help our non-Linux ports and embedded Linux, especially deep embedded systems such as cortex and blackfin which is coming along fairly nicely too. -- ___ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well.

Re: Proposal: switch default desktop to xfce

2013-10-28 Thread Olav Vitters
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:29:02PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Op 25-10-13 15:43, Olav Vitters schreef: On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:41:23PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: There is no good reason other than that's the way GNOME has been written. So change the code and get GNOME to behave

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
For those who haven't seen it, Lennart has posted some of his comments about all this on G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/115547683951727699051/posts/8RmiAQsW9qf Cheers, Chris. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: let's split the systemd binary package

2013-10-28 Thread Olav Vitters
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:58:16PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: E.g. XFCE either wants ConsoleKit, or logind. If you look at ConsoleKit, you'll notice it is NOT maintained. XFCE *needs* neither and in fact the vast vast majority of users do not either. I check the spec

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
IANA ftp-master, but here's my quick review: Please rename /sbin/rc to something else. We've had (unrelated) /usr/bin/rc in Debian for at least 18 years. Outch! This bites hard. Maybe you being the maintainer of the rc package is why you saw this immediately! :) Though that's

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Mirosław Baran
Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net wrote: For those who haven't seen it, Lennart has posted some of his comments about all this on G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/115547683951727699051/posts/8RmiAQsW9qf And the RH PR circus has already started around it. Lennart's g+ note is

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 19:23 +, Mirosław Baran wrote: And the RH PR circus has already started around it. Lennart's g+ note is written in his usual half-truth/half-omission mode. Not helpful at all. I guess just stating something like this, without real technical arguments why he is wrong

Re: Jessie release goal: DNSSEC as default recursive resolver

2013-10-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op 28-10-13 19:28, Thomas Goirand schreef: So, as per the replies we've read, it seems that the only way to implement DNSSEC would be to first check if it works, and if it doesn't, fallback to the locally provided recursive DNS server. This feels upside down to me. There is nothing in DNSSEC

Re: Proposal: let’s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-28 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:01:05PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: Could this problem be explained. As long as they are in separate directories and called explicitly does that matter? Please see the nodejs vs node thread(s). Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' :

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Olav Vitters
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:23:11PM +, Mirosław Baran wrote: Christoph Anton Mitterer cales...@scientia.net wrote: For those who haven't seen it, Lennart has posted some of his comments about all this on G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/115547683951727699051/posts/8RmiAQsW9qf And the

Re: let's split the systemd binary package

2013-10-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
You said vast vast majority, you do the work! At the moment it seems you're just changing goalpost as you go along. Not at all. I meant functions of a desktop that the average users use all along. So the vast vast majority of users such as laptop users do not need session tracking but may want

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Thorsten Glaser (Also, do remember that any decisive outcome other than “support multiple ones including systemd” and “systemd-only” will need to lead to the removal of GNOME from Debian. I won’t miss it, but just saying.) No, it won't necessarily lead to that. It might just as well

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
For those who haven't seen it, Lennart has posted some of his comments about all this on G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/115547683951727699051/posts/8RmiAQsW9qf And the RH PR circus has already started around it. Lennart's g+ note is written in his usual half-truth/half-omission

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
Please lets see what is around the corner before giving merit to these scare tactics especially for a Gnome desktop whose user base has and is rapidly declining. -- ___ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:20:28PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: Kevin, please change your tone on Debian lists. Your behavior is starting to border on malicious. If this continues, I will request that you get removed from the Debian lists. I'm sure others would join me. You're showing a lack of

Re: Proposal: s have a GR about the init system

2013-10-28 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Ian Jackson For what it's worth, I have complete confidence in Steve and Colin. (I have known Colin for a very long time as a friend, from well before either of us got involved with Canonical.) To the extent you want to raise a conflict of interest, I believe being the maintainer of one

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
I'll say no more to prevent the usual Turing Complete bullshit argument popping up but as complex as you choose is a good thing. And I forgot to say you can choose to make the Linux kernel as simple or complex as you like so taht's another falsity that he should have allowed comments to

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk (2013-10-28): Please lets see what is around the corner before giving merit to these scare tactics especially for a Gnome desktop whose user base has and is rapidly declining. Please refrain from continuing with that kind of chatter. It doesn't really help.

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:40:09 -0400 Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Kevin, please change your tone on Debian lists. Your behavior is starting to border on malicious. If this continues, I will request that you get removed from the Debian lists. I'm sure others would join me. You're showing a lack of

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:43:13PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: Well if I have offended anyone I apologise as that has not been my attention and I'm sure you would like me if you met me and realise this. I have no doubt, and I wasn't offended, I'm just growing tired of your disrespect for

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Kevin Chadwick
previously on this list Cyril Brulebois contributed: Please refrain from continuing with that kind of chatter. It doesn't really help. Quite the contrary. Fine but whether intended upstream or not, it cannot be argued with as truth. (Also, setting an attribution line with the name of the

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:40:09 -0400 Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Change your tone. Then please, try to show a better example of how that is done, instead of this: On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:07:59 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: I mean, no offense, but I've never seen you involved in Debian before [...]

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Kevin Chadwick dijo [Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:43:13PM +]: Kevin, please change your tone on Debian lists. Your behavior is starting to border on malicious. If this continues, I will request that you get removed from the Debian lists. I'm sure others would join me. You're showing a

Bug#728160: ITP: lime-forensics -- lime-forensics driver, a memory dumper (DKMS)

2013-10-28 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho eribe...@eriberto.pro.br * Package name: lime-forensics Version : 1.1-r17 Upstream Author : Joe Sylve joe.sy...@gmail.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/lime-forensics * License : GPL2

Bug#728162: ITP: django-oauth2-provider -- Provide OAuth2 access to django application

2013-10-28 Thread Kouhei Maeda
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kouhei Maeda mkou...@palmtb.net * Package name: django-oauth2-provider Version : 0.2.6 Upstream Author : Alen Mujezinovic * URL : https://github.com/caffeinehit/django-oauth2-provider * License : MIT Programming Lang:

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Russ Allbery
Wouter Verhelst wou...@master.debian.org writes: Also, since all alternative init implementations under consideration do support sysv-style init scripts, I think that whatever init system we (well, you, the TC) end up choosing, the requirement in policy should be that a package should ship

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 02:47:56 +0800 Thomas Goirand wrote: Note that OpenRC already works on some (non-Debian) BSD platforms, and that it should be trivial to have it to build on kFreeBSD and Hurd, And so I came up with the attached patch which gets it building on GNU/kFreeBSD, and it passed

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Brian May
On 29 October 2013 12:21, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: In other words, I don't think it would make any sense at all to standardize on upstart or systemd and then ask people to continue to write init scripts in the long run (transition issues aside). Getting rid of init scripts is not

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Russ Allbery
Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au writes: On 29 October 2013 12:21, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: In other words, I don't think it would make any sense at all to standardize on upstart or systemd and then ask people to continue to write init scripts in the long run (transition

Re: Bug#727708: tech-ctte: Decide which init system to default to in Debian.

2013-10-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 19:38 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au writes: On 29 October 2013 12:21, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: In other words, I don't think it would make any sense at all to standardize on upstart or systemd and then ask people to

Re: let's split the systemd binary package

2013-10-28 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2013-10-28 10:58, Kevin Chadwick wrote: By vast majority I was meaning user requirements and not distro packagers expectations, user requirements is actually the metric which should count the most and most users do not need session tracking, it can actually get in the way (one user using many

Accepted libnfc 1.7.0-3 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 07:54:27 +0900 Source: libnfc Binary: libnfc5 libnfc-dev libnfc5-dbg libnfc-bin libnfc-examples libnfc-pn53x-examples Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.7.0-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer:

Accepted lmdb 0.9.9-1 (source amd64 all)

2013-10-28 Thread Ondřej Surý
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:00:17 +0200 Source: lmdb Binary: lmdb-utils lmdb-dbg liblmdb0 liblmdb-dev lmdb-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 0.9.9-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Berkeley DB Group

Accepted ruby-shadow 2.2.0-1 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread David Suárez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:43:05 +0200 Source: ruby-shadow Binary: ruby-shadow Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.2.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers

Accepted live-build 4.0~alpha28-1 (source all)

2013-10-28 Thread Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:35:53 +0100 Source: live-build Binary: live-build live-build-cgi Architecture: source all Version: 4.0~alpha28-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Live Systems Maintainers

Accepted genometools 1.5.1-2 (source amd64 all)

2013-10-28 Thread Andreas Tille
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:17:04 +0100 Source: genometools Binary: genometools genometools-common libgenometools0 libgenometools0-dev genometools-doc genometools-dbg python-genometools Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.5.1-2

Accepted gns3 0.8.6-1 (source all)

2013-10-28 Thread Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 15:15:20 +0100 Source: gns3 Binary: gns3 Architecture: source all Version: 0.8.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk Changed-By: Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk

Accepted db5.3 5.3.28-3 (source all amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Ondřej Surý
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:17:57 +0100 Source: db5.3 Binary: db5.3-doc libdb5.3-dev libdb5.3 db5.3-util db5.3-sql-util libdb5.3++ libdb5.3++-dev libdb5.3-tcl libdb5.3-dbg libdb5.3-java-jni libdb5.3-java libdb5.3-java-gcj libdb5.3-java-dev

Accepted namazu2 2.0.21-8.1 (source all amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Sergei Golovan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:04:26 +0400 Source: namazu2 Binary: namazu2 namazu2-index-tools namazu2-common libnmz7 libnmz7-dev Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2.0.21-8.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: NOKUBI

Accepted xmobar 0.19-1 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Apollon Oikonomopoulos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:25:43 +0200 Source: xmobar Binary: xmobar Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.19-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Apollon Oikonomopoulos apoi...@gmail.com Changed-By: Apollon Oikonomopoulos

Accepted getdata 0.2-1 (source all)

2013-10-28 Thread Charles Plessy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:57:31 +0900 Source: getdata Binary: getdata Architecture: source all Version: 0.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Steffen Moeller moel...@debian.org Changed-By: Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org

Accepted pgrouting 2.0.0-2 (source amd64 all)

2013-10-28 Thread Michael Fladischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:08:23 +0100 Source: pgrouting Binary: postgresql-9.3-pgrouting postgresql-9.3-pgrouting-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 2.0.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GIS Project

Accepted mythtv-status 0.10.4-1 (source all)

2013-10-28 Thread Andrew Ruthven
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:03:44 +1300 Source: mythtv-status Binary: mythtv-status Architecture: source all Version: 0.10.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Ruthven and...@etc.gen.nz Changed-By: Andrew Ruthven

Accepted timidity 2.13.2-40.2 (source all amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Sergei Golovan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:07:01 +0400 Source: timidity Binary: timidity timidity-interfaces-extra timidity-el timidity-daemon Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2.13.2-40.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Geoffrey

Accepted autopkgtest 2.4 (source all)

2013-10-28 Thread Martin Pitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:25:30 +0100 Source: autopkgtest Binary: autopkgtest autopkgtest-xenlvm Architecture: source all Version: 2.4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Autopkgtest team

Accepted chrpath 0.14-3 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:52:04 +0100 Source: chrpath Binary: chrpath Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.14-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@debian.org Changed-By: Tollef Fog Heen

Accepted scsitools 0.12-2.2 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Sergei Golovan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:29:51 +0400 Source: scsitools Binary: scsitools Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.12-2.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Eric Delaunay delau...@debian.org Changed-By: Sergei Golovan

Accepted gpicview 0.2.4-1 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread dererk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:11:56 -0300 Source: gpicview Binary: gpicview gpicview-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.2.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian LXDE Maintainers lxde-deb...@lists.lxde.org

Accepted libgdiplus 2.11+git20131008.9732566-3 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Jo Shields
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:37:07 + Source: libgdiplus Binary: libgdiplus Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.11+git20131008.9732566-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Mono Group

Accepted fsmark 3.3-2 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Martin Steigerwald
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 10:03:22 +0200 Source: fsmark Binary: fsmark Architecture: source amd64 Version: 3.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de Changed-By: Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de

Accepted libsdl1.2 1.2.15-8 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:55:48 + Source: libsdl1.2 Binary: libsdl1.2debian libsdl1.2-dev libsdl1.2-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.2.15-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian SDL packages maintainers

Accepted sylph-searcher 1.2.0-9 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Hideki Yamane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 22:13:23 +0900 Source: sylph-searcher Binary: sylph-searcher Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.2.0-9 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.org Changed-By: Hideki Yamane

Accepted cableswig 0.1.0+cvs20111009-1.1 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Sergei Golovan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:41:43 +0400 Source: cableswig Binary: cableswig libcableswig-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1.0+cvs20111009-1.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Steve M. Robbins s...@debian.org

Accepted biosquid 1.9g+cvs20050121-3 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Andreas Tille
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:04:02 +0100 Source: biosquid Binary: biosquid biosquid-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.9g+cvs20050121-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian-Med Packaging Team

Accepted ruby-net-ldap 0.3.1-3 (source all)

2013-10-28 Thread David Suárez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 16:15:05 +0200 Source: ruby-net-ldap Binary: ruby-net-ldap Architecture: source all Version: 0.3.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers

Accepted patsy 0.2.1-3 (source all)

2013-10-28 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:40:58 -0400 Source: patsy Binary: python-patsy python3-patsy python-patsy-doc Architecture: source all Version: 0.2.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: NeuroDebian Team t...@neuro.debian.net

Accepted zephyr 3.1.2-1 (source amd64)

2013-10-28 Thread Karl Ramm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:57:21 -0400 Source: zephyr Binary: libzephyr4 libzephyr4-krb5 zephyr-clients zephyr-server zephyr-server-krb5 libzephyr-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 3.1.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low

Accepted libimobiledevice 1.1.5-1 (source amd64 all)

2013-10-28 Thread Chow Loong Jin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:01:08 +0800 Source: libimobiledevice Binary: libimobiledevice4 libimobiledevice-dev libimobiledevice4-dbg python-imobiledevice libimobiledevice-utils libimobiledevice-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version:

Accepted openvswitch 1.9.3+git20131028-1 (source i386 all)

2013-10-28 Thread Ben Pfaff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:40:31 -0700 Source: openvswitch Binary: openvswitch-datapath-source openvswitch-datapath-dkms openvswitch-common openvswitch-switch openvswitch-ipsec openvswitch-pki openvswitch-controller openvswitch-brcompat

Accepted personasplus 1.7.3-1 (source all)

2013-10-28 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:18:41 -0400 Source: personasplus Binary: xul-ext-personasplus Architecture: source all Version: 1.7.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Mozilla Extension Maintainers

  1   2   >