Hi Matthias (2014.06.26_08:38:09_+0200)
Of these, roughly 20% have switched to systemd. And they apparently did not
and do not have any problem with it, otherwise we'd hear about it. Here and
other places. Quite loudly.
Not necessarily.
My laptop won't boot with systemd, although other
Hello,
I know this question probably doesn't belong to this list, and I tried
debian-user@ first, but didn't get a single response.
I'm trying to create a VM with Windows 7. Is there a way to do that
from USB stick? It is a ~10GB corporate Windows package.
Thanks,
Eugene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi developers,
How to restart New Member Process?
I have had New Member Process in the past.
But It's canceled, because I had not a good response to it.
https://nm.debian.org/public/process/13039
Now, I would like to dput packages for ATS2 language.
http://www.ats-lang.org/
Hi,
Steve Langasek:
And yes, there are PHP extensions that are not distributable in binary form
because of this license. But relicensing *the extension* changes nothing
about this, they are *still* not redistributable as part of Debian because
they're linking GPL code into PHP which is and
Hi,
Clint Byrum:
That's quite the opposite of what I would suggest. Such distributions
may actually feel that they can withstand any damages that PHP/Zend can
claim against them, and their brands depend on them taking care of their
end users, but even if they didn't, they could also absorb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rene Engelhard r...@rene-engelhard.de
* Package name: ucpp
Version : 1.3.2
* URL : Thomas Pornin por...@bolet.org
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : embeddable, quick and light C preprocessor
A C
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 10:17, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
(C) Bite the bullet and admit that when everybody else calls a color
light blue which we consider to be cyan, we might as well docuent
that fact instead of trying to convince everybody else that they're
wrong, even if they are,
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 08:15, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Matthias (2014.06.26_08:38:09_+0200)
Of these, roughly 20% have switched to systemd. And they apparently did not
and do not have any problem with it, otherwise we'd hear about it. Here and
other places. Quite loudly.
Not
On 30/06/14 23:47, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Unless I'm mistaken, the wording in the PHP license makes it invalid for
anybody that isn't actually the PHP project to use without making a
false claim that THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE PHP DEVELOPMENT
TEAM.
The fact that ~nobody else believes
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 13:01, Ondřej Surý wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 08:15, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Matthias (2014.06.26_08:38:09_+0200)
Of these, roughly 20% have switched to systemd. And they apparently did
not
and do not have any problem with it, otherwise we'd hear about it.
Dear all,
A few days ago, after a routine upgrade from testing, the power button on
my laptop ceased functioning. I was busy at the time, so I lived with
having to remember to type sudo shutdown -h now for a few days; yesterday,
I finally took the time to debug the issue.
I started with strace
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Dear all,
A few days ago, after a routine upgrade from testing, the power button on
my laptop ceased functioning. I was busy at the time, so I lived with
having to remember to type sudo shutdown -h now for a few days;
1. Could some competent person tell me the right way to tell apt that
it
should fail an upgrade rather than installing systemd? I guess
I could make a dummy package that conflicts with systemd, but I'm
sure there's a better way.
I think you can just put
Package: systemd
Pin:
❦ 1 juillet 2014 15:25 +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek
j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr :
A few days ago, after a routine upgrade from testing, the power button on
my laptop ceased functioning. I was busy at the time, so I lived with
having to remember to type sudo shutdown -h now for a few days;
On Tue, July 1, 2014 15:25, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
2. Could some kind soul explain to the systemd maintainers that gentle
persuasion, while not always the most efficient way to take over the
world, is more in line with point 4 of the Debian Social Contract
than alternative
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
So I'm turning to this list for help:
1. Could some competent person tell me the right way to tell apt that it
should fail an upgrade rather than installing systemd? I guess
I could make a dummy package that conflicts with systemd, but I'm
I made such a
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 18:26:53 +0400
vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote:
1. Could some competent person tell me the right way to tell apt
that it
should fail an upgrade rather than installing systemd? I guess
I could make a dummy package that conflicts with systemd, but
I'm sure
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 04:38:16PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
The responses from the systemd maintainers are indeed on the terse side,
but I can imagine that your style of bug reporting does not invite our
volunteers to spend more time on it.
This is not a question of spending time. An
+++ Thorsten Glaser [2014-07-01 14:45 +]:
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
So I'm turning to this list for help:
1. Could some competent person tell me the right way to tell apt that it
should fail an upgrade rather than installing systemd? I guess
I could make a dummy package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
* Package name: openstack-doc-tools
Version : 0.15
Upstream Author : OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-...@lists.openstack.org
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/openstack-doc-tools
*
gentle persuasion [...] is more in line with point 4 of the Debian
Social Contract than [...] bullying?
May I suggest that you treat others the way you want to be treated?
I am not a Debian Developer. I am not bound by the Social Contract.
Are we to expect a higher standard of behaviour
Am 01.07.2014 17:20, schrieb Thomas Weber:
Or, taking a different perspective: now that the issue is known, what is
done to prevent another user from hitting the very same issue in the
future?
Install systemd-sysv for systemd-shim.
The libpam-systemd package in 204-9 ensures that either of the
On 01/07/14 17:20, Thomas Weber wrote:
Or, taking a different perspective: now that the issue is known, what is
done to prevent another user from hitting the very same issue in the
future?
I think that a critical debconf warning should be in place to avoid
replacing the init system of users
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-chalk
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus sindresor...@gmail.com (
http://sindresorhus.com)
* URL :
On 06/30/2014 05:43 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:27:49AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:42:09AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Thomas Goirand
+1 for keeping the name which is funny
What's funny about an OS stating publicly that a
Am 01.07.2014 17:35, schrieb Juliusz Chroboczek:
I am not a Debian Developer. I am not bound by the Social Contract.
I may remind you about [1] then. If you feel like you need to rant or
vent, please do it someplace else or expect a terse answer like the one
you got.
[1]
* Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr, 2014-07-01, 15:25:
I filed bug 753357
Why is this bug marked as fixed in systemd/204-9?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Matthias Urlichs matth...@urlichs.de writes:
(C) Bite the bullet and admit that when everybody else calls a color
light blue which we consider to be cyan, we might as well docuent
that fact instead of trying to convince everybody else that they're
wrong, even if they are, from our
Michael Biebl made an argument from authority:
Am 01.07.2014 17:35, schrieb Juliusz Chroboczek:
I am not a Debian Developer. I am not bound by the Social Contract.
I may remind you about [1] then. If you feel like you need to rant or
vent, please do it someplace else or expect a terse
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
The responses from the systemd maintainers are indeed on the terse
side,
but I can imagine that your style of bug reporting does not invite our
volunteers to spend more time on it.
The replies were not just terse, the replies were downright rude.
Can we perhaps agree
On 01/07/14, 05:35pm, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
gentle persuasion [...] is more in line with point 4 of the Debian
Social Contract than [...] bullying?
May I suggest that you treat others the way you want to be treated?
I am not a Debian Developer. I am not bound by the Social
On Tue, July 1, 2014 17:35, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
gentle persuasion [...] is more in line with point 4 of the Debian
Social Contract than [...] bullying?
May I suggest that you treat others the way you want to be treated?
I am not a Debian Developer. I am not bound by the Social
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 17:20, Thomas Weber wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 04:38:16PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
The responses from the systemd maintainers are indeed on the terse side,
but I can imagine that your style of bug reporting does not invite our
volunteers to spend more time
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 18:03, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr, 2014-07-01, 15:25:
I filed bug 753357
Why is this bug marked as fixed in systemd/204-9?
I suggest to reassign this bug to acpi-support-base and stop this
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-jsondiffpatch
Version : 0.1.7
Upstream Author : Benjamin Eidelman benei...@gmail.com
* URL :
On Jul 01, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez clo...@igalia.com wrote:
I think that a critical debconf warning should be in place to avoid
replacing the init system of users without prior explicit consent.
I think that this would be an annoying waste of time for most users,
since only a few people
Am 01.07.2014 18:28, schrieb Ondřej Surý:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 18:03, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr, 2014-07-01, 15:25:
I filed bug 753357
Why is this bug marked as fixed in systemd/204-9?
I suggest to reassign this bug to acpi-support-base and
The replies were not just terse, the replies were downright rude.
That's hardly the main problem with Michael's behaviour.
I reported an actual bug, including conclusions that I got from fourty
minutes of tracing the ACPI scripts. Michael closed it straight away,
without investigating the
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 18:09, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 01, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez clo...@igalia.com wrote:
I think that a critical debconf warning should be in place to avoid
replacing the init system of users without prior explicit consent.
I think that this would be an annoying
Am 01.07.2014 18:53, schrieb Juliusz Chroboczek:
Michael closed it straight away,
without investigating the issue.
Oh, I did. That's why I told you to install systemd-shim.
It would be great if you can dial down your accusations a little.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking
On 01/07/14 18:09, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 01, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez clo...@igalia.com wrote:
I think that a critical debconf warning should be in place to avoid
replacing the init system of users without prior explicit consent.
I think that this would be an annoying waste of time
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 04:23:01PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
You get a choice of 'prevent-systemd' which stops it running as init
but allows the -shim and libpam packages so that logind and the like
will work. Or 'systemd-must-die' which conflicts with everything
systemdish.
Wookey,
Please rename
I think that this would be an annoying waste of time for most users,
since only a few people care so much about not being tainted by systemd
I do not care being tainted by systemd when it works. Actually on two
very different machines it means no audio for me.
On a NAS it means no
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-zip-stream
Version : 0.3.5
Upstream Author : Chris Talkington (http://christalkington.com/)
* URL :
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 06:09:08PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 01, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez clo...@igalia.com wrote:
I think that a critical debconf warning should be in place to avoid
replacing the init system of users without prior explicit consent.
I think that this would be an
2014-07-01 19:38 GMT+02:00 Eric Valette eric.vale...@free.fr:
I think that this would be an annoying waste of time for most users,
since only a few people care so much about not being tainted by systemd
I do not care being tainted by systemd when it works. Actually on two very
different
On 2014-07-01, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez clo...@igalia.com wrote:
Maybe desktops user don't care much about the init system as long as
they can boot to the desktop.
They care as long as everything works. And for everything works to
keep on happening, we need a effective migration to systemd,
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 06:53:27PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
The replies were not just terse, the replies were downright rude.
That's hardly the main problem with Michael's behaviour.
I stand by what I said yesterday, in a different thread, but the same
mailing list:
# When a project
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-archiver
Version : 0.10.1
Upstream Author : Chris Talkington (http://christalkington.com/)
* URL :
Am 01.07.2014 19:38, schrieb Eric Valette:
I think that this would be an annoying waste of time for most users,
since only a few people care so much about not being tainted by systemd
I do not care being tainted by systemd when it works. Actually on two
very different machines it means no
Miroslaw,
unless you offer to ack as a front desk for bugs in systemd, then
please go with your judgments elsewhere. Your judgmental
comments are neither helpful nor welcome here.
Thanks,
Ondrej
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 18:17, Mirosław Baran wrote:
Michael Biebl made an argument from authority:
Michael,
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 18:51, Michael Biebl wrote:
Install systemd-sysv for systemd-shim.
The libpam-systemd package in 204-9 ensures that either of the two is
installed.
The behaviour of acpi-support-base is correct, there shouldn't be any
bug filed against it.
please don't
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 20:18, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Michael,
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 18:51, Michael Biebl wrote:
Install systemd-sysv for systemd-shim.
The libpam-systemd package in 204-9 ensures that either of the two is
installed.
The behaviour of acpi-support-base is correct,
❦ 1 juillet 2014 10:53 -0700, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org :
- hold systemd back at 204 until systemd-shim is updated
The way user sessions work is quite different between 204 and 208. I
would hope that Jessie will come with 208 for this reason. Holding
systemd until systemd-shim is
Michael closed it straight away, without investigating the issue.
Oh, I did. That's why I told you to install systemd-shim.
Now could you please reopen bug 753357, or at least allow me to do it?
-- Juliusz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 01/07/2014 19:59, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
These are valid points, and thank you for reporting bugs! However, as
unstable user, some breakage can be expected, and the point for
transitioning early in unstable is to make the transition as smooth as
possible when someone uprades Debian stable,
On 1 July 2014 19:15:32 IST, Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org wrote:
unless you offer to ack as a front desk for bugs in systemd, then
please go with your judgments elsewhere. Your judgmental
comments are neither helpful nor welcome here.
My comment was factual and polite, thank you very much.
Am 01.07.2014 20:21, schrieb Ondřej Surý:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 20:18, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Michael,
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 18:51, Michael Biebl wrote:
Install systemd-sysv for systemd-shim.
The libpam-systemd package in 204-9 ensures that either of the two is
installed.
The behaviour of
Which bug report is that?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748651
I will try to add the requested debug log ASAP. Dunno where I got the
initial bogus trace command from. Probably not invented it.
--eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 20:08:35 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 01.07.2014 19:38, schrieb Eric Valette:
I think that this would be an annoying waste of time for most users,
since only a few people care so much about not being tainted by
systemd
I do not care being tainted by systemd when it
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 08:23:09PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 1 juillet 2014 10:53 -0700, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org :
- hold systemd back at 204 until systemd-shim is updated
The way user sessions work is quite different between 204 and 208. I
would hope that Jessie will come
Am 01.07.2014 19:53, schrieb Steve Langasek:
new init. But the systemd maintainers are anxious to update to a newer
version in unstable, and while there are plans in Ubuntu to make
systemd-shim support the interfaces needed for newer logind, this isn't
ready yet.
This issue has been known
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 05:37:55PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 01.07.2014 17:20, schrieb Thomas Weber:
Or, taking a different perspective: now that the issue is known, what is
done to prevent another user from hitting the very same issue in the
future?
Install systemd-sysv
Am 01.07.2014 21:06, schrieb Eric Valette:
Which bug report is that?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748651
Ok, thanks for sharing.
As for the issue you encountered on your NAS using RAID10: Please do
file a bug report and we will follow up there
Michael
--
Why is it
Am 01.07.2014 21:33, schrieb Steve Langasek:
Ok, thanks for this clarification. I didn't realize this dependency had not
yet made it into testing.
FWIW, from reading the bug log, it was not clear to me that you were taking
responsibility for this bug and stating that it had been fixed in
Am 01.07.2014 21:34, schrieb Michael Biebl:
Indeed, I take the blame for my verbosity here.
Or non-verbosity, if you so wish.
I do have to add that the tone of the bug report didn't really inspire
me to write paragraphs of explanations.
You know, I'm also just a human.
--
Why is it that all
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 08:57:37PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 01.07.2014 20:21, schrieb Ondřej Surý:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 20:18, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Michael,
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 18:51, Michael Biebl wrote:
Install systemd-sysv for systemd-shim.
The libpam-systemd package in
On 2014-07-01, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
The question is which of these is a worse outcome for the jessie release. I
come down firmly on the side that breaking desktops on upgrade is a worse
outcome than being behind on the latest and greatest user session interface=
s.
We
Juliusz, can you please paste your apt logs showing what pulled systemd
in on the system?
Sent by private mail. If anyone else wants a copy, please drop me a note.
-- Juliusz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
]] Michael Biebl
Am 01.07.2014 19:53, schrieb Steve Langasek:
new init. But the systemd maintainers are anxious to update to a newer
version in unstable, and while there are plans in Ubuntu to make
systemd-shim support the interfaces needed for newer logind, this isn't
ready yet.
On 13624 March 1977, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
You get a choice of 'prevent-systemd' which stops it running as init
but allows the -shim and libpam packages so that logind and the like
will work. Or 'systemd-must-die' which conflicts with everything
systemdish.
Please rename the systemd-must-die
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-lastfm
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : James Scott jam...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/jammus/lastfm-node
* License
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:47:36PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2014-07-01, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
The question is which of these is a worse outcome for the jessie release. I
come down firmly on the side that breaking desktops on upgrade is a worse
outcome than being
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 22:09 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 13624 March 1977, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
You get a choice of 'prevent-systemd' which stops it running as init
but allows the -shim and libpam packages so that logind and the like
will work. Or 'systemd-must-die' which conflicts
On 2014-07-01, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
https://bugs.debian.org/src:systemd-shim
Show me a bug report, not FUD.
I'd rather point to the likely-faulty code.
it is likely in or around
src:kde-workspace/powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/powerdevilupowerbackend.cpp
when
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no wrote:
]] Michael Biebl
Am 01.07.2014 19:53, schrieb Steve Langasek:
new init. But the systemd maintainers are anxious to update to a newer
version in unstable, and while there are plans in Ubuntu to make
systemd-shim support
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I don't think so. I think it encourages to be more easy going, and have
fun, but never mind. Let's keep Debian boring^W^Wportland weird. :)
+1
Fun is missing, humour even more.
Norbert
Am 02.07.2014 00:09, schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no wrote:
Just as a heads-up: We're planning on making 208 hit unstable once 204-9
is in testing, and then follow up with newer versions once we deem they
are ready.
Do you mean
+++ Lars Wirzenius [2014-07-01 18:34 +0100]:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 04:23:01PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
You get a choice of 'prevent-systemd' which stops it running as init
but allows the -shim and libpam packages so that logind and the like
will work. Or 'systemd-must-die' which conflicts
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
Also, post-upgrade-pre-reboot systems has had issues since forever,
No. There have been very few instances in which the system was left in an
unusable state after a dist-upgrade, even for desktops.
On desktops, upgrades of iceweasel and icedove
Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com writes:
What about systemd-nogo or nogo-systemd, alternately just no-systemd?
I have a ‘no-mono’ package (not hosted anywhere; I welcome contact from
anyone who wants to upload it).
I would expect ‘prevent-…’ or ‘no-…’ as the name of such packages.
--
+1 :)
On Jul 1, 2014 6:39 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I don't think so. I think it encourages to be more easy going, and have
fun, but never mind. Let's keep Debian boring^W^Wportland weird. :)
+1
Fun is missing, humour even
+++ Stefano Zacchiroli [2014-06-30 11:43 +0200]:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:27:49AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:42:09AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Thomas Goirand
+1 for keeping the name which is funny
What's funny about an OS stating publicly that a
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 01:53:06AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
But OK. I get it - this is still too contentious to have any room for
this sort of foolishness and if it's to exist at all it'll have to be
called something boring. That's a little sad, but we'll all
survive. This isn't supposed to be a
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
+++ Stefano Zacchiroli [2014-06-30 11:43 +0200]:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:27:49AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:42:09AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Thomas Goirand
+1 for keeping the name
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez clo...@igalia.com writes:
But I think that many sysadmins that are going to upgrade their servers
from wheezy to jessie care about this.
Indeed. I care very much about ensuring that systemd is installed on my
servers, as I think the benefits for servers are at least
Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org writes:
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
Also, post-upgrade-pre-reboot systems has had issues since forever,
No. There have been very few instances in which the system was left in
an unusable state after a dist-upgrade, even for desktops.
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 15:06:08 -0500
Source: terminator
Binary: terminator
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.97-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella nvalcar...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Julián
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 20:49:17 +0800
Source: scrub
Binary: scrub
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.5.2-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Taylor ctay...@debian.org
Changed-By: Chen Baozi baoz...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 12:34:37 +0200
Source: weboob
Binary: python-weboob python-weboob-core weboob weboob-qt
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.i-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Romain Bignon rom...@symlink.me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 20:42:06 +0800
Source: robotfindskitten
Binary: robotfindskitten
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.7320508.406-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ryan Finnie r...@finnie.org
Changed-By: Chen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 20:44:21 +0800
Source: rxvt
Binary: rxvt rxvt-ml
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:2.7.10-5.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: George Gensure wer...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Wookey woo...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 23:30:31 +0200
Source: stella
Binary: stella
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Games Team pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 18:27:46 -0400
Source: ncbi-blast+
Binary: ncbi-blast+ ncbi-blast+-legacy
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.2.29-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:18:03 +0200
Source: python-setuptools
Binary: python-pkg-resources python-setuptools python-setuptools-doc
python3-pkg-resources python3-setuptools python-setuptools-whl
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.3-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:11:00 +0200
Source: blueman
Binary: blueman
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.23-git201406261335-deb-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christopher Schramm deb...@shakaweb.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 11:29:49 +1000
Source: fsharp
Binary: fsharp libfsharp-core4.3-cil libfsharp-data-typeproviders4.3-cil
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0.34+dfsg-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian CLI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 01:05:41 +0100
Source: an
Binary: an
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Paul Martin p...@debian.org
Changed-By: Paul Martin p...@debian.org
Description:
an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 16:51:36 -0700
Source: pelican
Binary: python-pelican
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Applications Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 21:31:02 -0700
Source: libndp
Binary: libndp-dbg libndp-dev libndp-tools libndp0
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Ayer a...@andrewayer.name
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
