On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Perhaps some of this could be put into devscripts ?
Just as ick, DNS is the place for service aliases.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
On Jul 09, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> It's looking like jquery >= 1.10 isn't compatible with <=1.9, and it's a
> problem for packaging OpenStack horizon (ie: the web UI for OpenStack).
> As we're close to the freeze, I don't think the release team would love
> to have such high profile transition.
I
Hi Niels,
On Mi 09 Jul 2014 19:44:39 CEST, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thank you for your efforts.
If you plan on doing this transition for Jessie, please do keep the "5th
of September" deadline in mind[1].
Ack.
Please also consider filing a
transition bug to help us (the release team)
Quoting Marco d'Itri (m...@linux.it):
> On Jul 09, Alessio Treglia wrote:
>
> > I think that it would be valuable for our users to keep the
> > non-default init system working on Jessie for those who do neither
> > intend nor need to switch to systemd.
> I suggest less thinking and more coding th
On 2014-07-09 18:51, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> short notice from my side... (defacto / so far libjpeg-turbo package
> maintainer)...
>
> I can start working on the libjpeg-turbo transition at the beginning of
> August. First step is, I guess, providing libjpeg-turbo with libjpeg
> compat
Hi,
I won't be available/reachable during this period for package maintenance.
In case of issue, the Debian Med team can manage my packages, thank you for
forwarding the the debian-med mailng list.
Olivier
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 01:15:50AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I'd be very happy to read opinions and advices on this topic.
These js files are so small, the deb add more data in bookkeeping than
they do code.
Why can't we have jquery-common or javascript-common or
javascript-kitchen-sink and
Hi,
It's looking like jquery >= 1.10 isn't compatible with <=1.9, and it's a
problem for packaging OpenStack horizon (ie: the web UI for OpenStack).
As we're close to the freeze, I don't think the release team would love
to have such high profile transition.
So I'd like to restart the topic: woul
On Jul 09, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> I think that it would be valuable for our users to keep the
> non-default init system working on Jessie for those who do neither
> intend nor need to switch to systemd.
I suggest less thinking and more coding then, because an updated
systemd-shim still has not
Hi all,
short notice from my side... (defacto / so far libjpeg-turbo package
maintainer)...
I can start working on the libjpeg-turbo transition at the beginning
of August. First step is, I guess, providing libjpeg-turbo with
libjpeg compat mode enabled.
The package currently is team-mai
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Prévot
* Package name: php-mssql-bundle
Version : 0~20140212
Upstream Author : Corrupt
* URL : https://github.com/intellectsoft-uk/MssqlBundle
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: PHP
Description : Symfo
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>- existing installations of older (pre-jessie) Debian may be
> upgraded to our new standard init system systemd, but only
> after the user has been suitably warned, e.g. via a debconf
> propmpt at priority "medium" (i.e. no
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Maiorino
* Package name: tz-converter
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : David Maiorino
* URL : https://github.com/DMaiorino/tz-converter
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Front-end to c
t...@debian.org wrote:
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>>with this constant bickering and sniping. If you must do it, start the
>>GR and see how that goes. I even offer to second it just to help get
>
>Can you help formulate? I do not feel my English skills are
>up to that.
I'm sorry, I don't really have
Hi,
Quoting Maarten Lankhorst (2014-07-09 15:48:33)
> ==> llvm-toolchain-3.4_3.4.1-4.arch-all.unusedbd.real <==
> automake=1:1.14.1-3
> autotools-dev=20140510.1
> diffstat=1.58-1
> doxygen=1.8.7-1
> flex=2.5.39-7
> lcov=1.10-1
> libtool=2.4.2-1.7
> patchutils=0.3.3-1
> procps=1:3.3.9-5
> sharutils
op 07-07-14 14:20, Johannes Schauer schreef:
> Hi,
>
> sorry I attached two wrong files containing the many false positives already
> noticed by some of the replies. Here the actual results.
>
> Sorry.
>
> cheers, josch
==> llvm-toolchain-3.4_3.4.1-4.arch-all.unusedbd.real <==
automake=1:1.14.1-3
Peter Palfrader writes ("Re: Search for porterbox machines on the command
line"):
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Jon Bernard wrote:
> > https://github.com/jbernard/porterbox
>
> Ick.
I agree. But...
> I usually just spell that "ldapsearch".
> ldapsearch -h db.debian.org -x -b dc=debian,dc=org 'p
17 matches
Mail list logo
