Hi,
Quoting Ralf Treinen (2014-11-07 17:35:06)
> It just appeared to me that we probably do not have a syntax to pinpoint a
> package built for a specific architecture. "We" meaning in this case dpkg,
> apt, and dose (if I am not mistaken).
No. We do have it.
> The usual trick in dose would be,
UDD can help with this.
A list of source packages that have M-A: same binary packages in jessie that
have different versions in any two release architectures is at:
http://debian.nanonanonano.net/qa/maskew
There are currently 247 source packages in that list (assuming I've not done
so
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-omegahat-xmlrpc
Version : 0.3-0
Upstream Author : Duncan Temple Lang
* URL or Web page : http://www.omegahat.org/XMLRPC/
* License : BSD
Description : GNU R package for RPC over XML
This (ti
Ew.
I've always thought you have been providing Debian with very sensible
thoughts and guiding. Your wisdom will be missed. Wishing you the
best.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
On 11/07/2014 05:07 PM, debian-devel-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org wrote:
Subject:
so long and thanks for all the fish
From:
Joey Hess
Date:
11/07/2014 04:04 PM
To:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
It's become abundantly clear that this is no longer the project I
originally joined in 1996. We'
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 17:04 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> but I'm out.
Wow what saddening news :-(
It's really a pity to good ones leaving... hope you'd reconsider your
decision and come back after some break perhaps!
If not, all the best and thanks.
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/M
Joey Hess writes:
> It's become abundantly clear that this is no longer the project I
> originally joined in 1996. We've made some good things, and I wish
> everyone well, but I'm out.
Thank you. You've been a model Debian member to many of us, and I will
miss your inspiration and clear-headedne
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 13:11 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am preparing a package for a scientific camera andor3.
> This package contain a kernel module for the video grabber.
>
> >From the constructor documentation, I need to add the nopat option to
> the linux command line
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Kastner
* Package name: gitinspector
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Ejwa Software
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/gitinspector/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : statistical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
In advance sorry for all spelling mistake that I will write as I am writing
from my phone and I am not a native English speaker.
I am emotionally crushed by this.
You are one of two DD's I interviewed for our LUG in Banja Luka, shortly after
conf
Hi Joey,
among all the Debian developers you have been one of the most inspiring to me.
I hope that you will keep your blog syndicated on planet.debian.org !
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Joey Hess wrote:
> It's become abundantly clear that this is no longer the project I
> originally joined in 1996. We've made some good things, and I wish
> everyone well, but I'm out.
(Insert record-scratch sound-effect and sounds of brain rebooting here.)
Thank you deeply for your work. It sadd
Joey Hess writes:
> It's become abundantly clear that this is no longer the project I
> originally joined in 1996. We've made some good things, and I wish
> everyone well, but I'm out.
I'm gutted.
> If I have one regret from my 18 years in Debian, it's that when the
> Debian constitution was or
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 05:04:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> It's become abundantly clear that this is no longer the project I
> originally joined in 1996. We've made some good things, and I wish
> everyone well, but I'm out.
>
> Note that this also constitutes an orphaning as upstream of
> debhel
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 12:40:29PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > debootstrap --include and --exclude should work.
>
> Yes of course. If not there could be a --variant=sysvinit, but clearly
> it should be possible to debootstrap without systemd.
I'd say every --variant except the default should
On Nov 07, Joey Hess wrote:
> It's become abundantly clear that this is no longer the project I
> originally joined in 1996. We've made some good things, and I wish
> everyone well, but I'm out.
Well, this sucks.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
2014-11-07 22:04 GMT+01:00 Joey Hess :
> It's become abundantly clear that this is no longer the project I
> originally joined in 1996. We've made some good things, and I wish
> everyone well, but I'm out.
>
> Note that this also constitutes an orphaning as upstream of
> debhelper, alien, dpkg
It's become abundantly clear that this is no longer the project I
originally joined in 1996. We've made some good things, and I wish
everyone well, but I'm out.
Note that this also constitutes an orphaning as upstream of
debhelper, alien, dpkg-repack, and debmirror.
I will be making final orphani
+++ Ralf Treinen [2014-11-07 17:35 +0100]:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:46:31PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> For this reason we should probably limit ourselves to all the interesting
> cases of combinations of native and foreign architectures. The only
> reasonable combination that I can curren
On 07/11/14 16:15, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> There is only one package in the "each" category, and this is a false
> positive due to multiarch: lib32nss-mdns, which exists only on amd64
> (this is why it shows up in the each category) and depends on an i386
> package, which is deliberate in this case.
Hi Holger,
(repliying separately to the two pointes raised by you)
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:46:31PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 5. November 2014, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > yes, you did miss something :-)
> > first link on the page: "Non-installable packages"
> > https://qa.debian.
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:46:31PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > 2) if you ask about co-installablity of packages with the same name but
> > different architectictures (and which are M-A=same) : this is a completely
> > different (and much more interesting) question. Since dose is now
> > multi-
Sam Hartman dijo [Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:58:29AM +]:
>
> Early morning, Wednesday, November 19, the results of the GR on init
> system coupling will be announced.
> No result will make everyone happy. In fact, that morning, some of our
> developers, users and contributors will be really unha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthias Klumpp
* Package name: pk-update-icon
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Guido Berhoerster
* URL : https://code.guido-berhoerster.org/projects/pk-update-icon/
* License : GPL-2.0+
Programming Lang: C
Descript
Hi Holger,
Quoting Holger Levsen (2014-11-07 16:31:09)
> > I agree with Ralf, that this would best be done not by debcheck but by a
> > small script which compares if the Packages files for all distributions
> > ship M-A:same packages in the same version.
>
> I'd happily run this script on jenkin
Hi Johannes,
On Freitag, 7. November 2014, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> but was your original question not about debcheck checking for multiarch
> co-installability across architectures?
yes, this was just a btw-question on the side...
> I agree with Ralf, that this would best be done not by debch
Hi Holger,
Quoting Holger Levsen (2014-11-07 15:46:31)
> On Mittwoch, 5. November 2014, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > yes, you did miss something :-)
> > first link on the page: "Non-installable packages"
> > https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/unstable_main/index.html
>
> thanks! (+doh, I guessed I ov
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:30:32PM +1100, csir...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
> Apologies in advance. You really hit a nerve here.
>
> Kernel 3.7 was released December 2012. Debian project created a dependency on
> this for the default init system roughly 15 months later. Which is fine, and
> perfectly
Hi Ralf,
On Mittwoch, 5. November 2014, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> yes, you did miss something :-)
> first link on the page: "Non-installable packages"
> https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/unstable_main/index.html
thanks! (+doh, I guessed I oversaw these links on the debcheck pages and then
didnt fi
Le 07. 11. 14 13:32, csir...@yahoo.com.au a écrit :
Finally can I just re-iterate: these are not "old" or obscure SoCs; TI
and freescale each have massive sales in CPU lines that don't have
>3.0 kernels. The world's biggest Qseven COM vendor doesn't have an
ARM board that supports >3.0 kernels.
HI,
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 01:11:51PM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am preparing a package for a scientific camera andor3. This package
> contain a kernel module for the video grabber.
>
> >From the constructor documentation, I need to add the nopat option to
> >the linu
Hello,
I am preparing a package for a scientific camera andor3.
This package contain a kernel module for the video grabber.
>From the constructor documentation, I need to add the nopat option to the
>linux command line.
So I would like to know what is the proper way to customize this command li
-Original Message-
From: Riku Voipio
To: csir...@yahoo.com.au
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-embed...@lists.debian.org
Sent: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 22:36
Subject: Re: debootstrap and cdebootstrap vs systemd
> If you choose an old Soc vendor kernel, you effectively choose to use old
>
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:30:32PM +1100, csir...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
> "Don't accept old kernels" is almost equivalent to telling many
> unrelated businesses in a particular ecosystem to burn their
> investments and start again from scratch, just because the SoC and/or
> board vendors have a broke
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:00:38AM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2014, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> > You can chroot to the system from the host machine, and upgrade to sysvinit.
> > If your host can't run arm code, install qemu-user-static and copy
> > /usr/bin/qemu-arm-static to the
On 07/11/14 21:12, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Yes, your ecosystem is broken. That's your prerogative, but please do
> not pretend that Debian has to support it.
>
Where did you hear me say Debian has to support it? I'm reacting to the
whimsical suggestion that running a new kernel is just a matter of
On Nov 07, csir...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
> "Don't accept old kernels" is almost equivalent to telling many
> unrelated businesses in a particular ecosystem to burn their
> investments and start again from scratch, just because the SoC and/or
> board vendors have a broken business model. And that'
For what it's worth, some of the boards I work with aren't emulated by
QEMU either.
However, for me that did not turn out to be a problem for chrooting into
my alien rootfs just to run apt/dpkg & friends.
Qemu only has to emulate a very minimal/"thin" CPU environment when
chrooting with binfmts,
-Original Message-
From: Cyril Brulebois
To: Simon Richter
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-embed...@lists.debian.org,
debootst...@packages.debian.org, cdebootst...@packages.debian.org
Sent: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:45
Subject: Re: debootstrap and cdebootstrap vs systemd
> You might
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014, Adam Borowski wrote:
> You can chroot to the system from the host machine, and upgrade to sysvinit.
> If your host can't run arm code, install qemu-user-static and copy
> /usr/bin/qemu-arm-static to the target system.
This is no fix. There are systems Qemu does not emulate.
de
40 matches
Mail list logo
