On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> I made a Greasemonkey userscript to manage bug reports from
> bugs.debian.org. It allows manipulating the tags list, the severity, the
> forwarded to address, and so on. It generates clickable mailto: links
> with all the needed commands f
On 12/06/2015 06:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Paul Gevers's message of 2015-12-06 05:23:07 -0800:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> TL;DR;1 if your package depends on dbconfig-common please update your
>> dependencies when my version 2.0.0 hits the archive (I expect in two
>> weeks).
>> TL;DR;2 should
On 12/06/2015 02:23 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> As a bonus, I can now add the database server packages to recommends,
> which should make life of the less experienced user easier. Do you think
> I should do this, or should I leave the database server package at the
> suggests level?
Please don't put
Hi,
On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> >> This would then give this for dpkg:
> >>
> >> List-Id:
> >>
> >> I can add this if it's actually useful. Anyone seconding Simon's request?
>
> on behalf of all gmail users, yes please.
Done.
I did not add the keyword in the identifier b
Hello,
I made a Greasemonkey userscript to manage bug reports from
bugs.debian.org. It allows manipulating the tags list, the severity, the
forwarded to address, and so on. It generates clickable mailto: links
with all the needed commands for control@bdo. It is available at
https://anonscm.de
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:30:47PM +0100, Stefan Pietsch wrote:
> Dear LaMont, dear list,
> is the postfix package still maintained?
> There seems to be no activity since November 2014.
My plans to work on this recently got derailed in dealing with a death
in the family. As it currently sits, I'm
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:26:30PM -0200, Albino B Neto wrote:
> > is the postfix package still maintained?
> >
> > There seems to be no activity since November 2014.
>
> really?
>
> https://packages.debian.org/jessie/postfix
This package is from November 2014.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Desc
Albino B Neto wrote:
> 2015-12-09 12:30 GMT-02:00 Stefan Pietsch :
>> is the postfix package still maintained?
>> There seems to be no activity since November 2014.
> really?
> https://packages.debian.org/jessie/postfix
Could you please be a little bit more verbose?
cu Andreas
--
`What a goo
On 09/12/15 18:26, Albino B Neto wrote:
> 2015-12-09 12:30 GMT-02:00 Stefan Pietsch :
>> is the postfix package still maintained?
>>
>> There seems to be no activity since November 2014.
>
> really?
>
> https://packages.debian.org/jessie/postfix
There is an RC bug since 14 November 2015, no ac
2015-12-09 12:30 GMT-02:00 Stefan Pietsch :
> is the postfix package still maintained?
>
> There seems to be no activity since November 2014.
really?
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/postfix
Albino
Mathias Behrle dijo [Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:16:38AM +0100]:
> Some questions for Tryton server:
>
> The situation is
>
> - Tryton server runs out of the box without configuration with a SQLite
> database
> - The (strongly) recommended database is PostgreSQL, but there is also support
> for M
On Dec 9, 2015 8:44 AM, "Raphael Hertzog" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > How about adding a List-Id header (RFC 2919) there? MUAs may have
> > better user interfaces for splitting on List-Id's than other headers.
> > Just an idea.
>
> And we would use package name + se
Dear LaMont, dear list,
is the postfix package still maintained?
There seems to be no activity since November 2014.
Regards,
Stefan
On 9 December 2015 at 13:58, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog , 2015-12-09, 14:43:
>>>
>>> How about adding a List-Id header (RFC 2919) there? MUAs may have better
>>> user interfaces for splitting on List-Id's than other headers. Just an idea.
>>
>>
>> And we would use package name + servic
+++ Jakub Wilk [2015-12-09 14:47 +0100]:
> * Stéphane Glondu , 2015-12-07, 16:23:
> >>* is there a way to track down who uploaded -3+b1?
> >For "who", I don't know.
>
> BinNMU are usually scheduled by the Release Team.
> This package was part of the ncurses transition:
> https://release.debian.org
* Raphael Hertzog , 2015-12-09, 14:43:
How about adding a List-Id header (RFC 2919) there? MUAs may have
better user interfaces for splitting on List-Id's than other headers.
Just an idea.
And we would use package name + service name as identifier?
This would then give this for dpkg:
List-
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> List-Id:
Hmm, I would have thought to include keywords also:
List-Id:
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
* Stéphane Glondu , 2015-12-07, 16:23:
* is there a way to track down who uploaded -3+b1?
For "who", I don't know.
BinNMU are usually scheduled by the Release Team.
This package was part of the ncurses transition:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ncurses.html
But for "why", cf
/us
On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> How about adding a List-Id header (RFC 2919) there? MUAs may have
> better user interfaces for splitting on List-Id's than other headers.
> Just an idea.
And we would use package name + service name as identifier?
This would then give this for dpkg:
Hi,
On Wed, 09 Dec 2015, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I was just wondering: would it be now possible to use
> @packages.debian.org as contact address (Maintainer field) for a
> Debian package, or is it still impossible because of forward loops ?
Right now, it's still not a good idea but it should not
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> For package subscribers
> ---
>
> In theory, as a package subscriber you have nothing to do, in practice,
> depending on your mail filtering rules, you might have to adjust them.
> Each forwarded mail now has headers like this:
>
> X-Loop: dispa..
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Debian Med Team"
* Package name: INDELible
Version : 1.03
Upstream Author : William Fletcher
* URL : http://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/indelible/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : A powerful
Le Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 12:18:21PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> we're getting one step further in the deprecation of
> packages.qa.debian.org in favor of the new tracker.debian.org. We have
> just migrated all mail subscriptions from the old PTS to the new package
> tracker. This does impa
23 matches
Mail list logo
