Re: Test instance of our infrastructure

2016-11-28 Thread Niels Thykier
Ian Jackson: > We are running a multitude of services. > > [...] > > Should we not have public test instances of all these things ? > > [...] > > My starting points for answers to these questions are something like > this: > > [...] > > If we wrote some of this down then infrastructure opera

Bug#846191: ITP: node-json-stable-stringify -- deterministic JSON.stringify()

2016-11-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-json-stable-stringify Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : James Halliday (http://substack.net) * URL : https://github.com/substack/json-stable-stringi

Bug#846185: ITP: ixo-usb-jtag -- Firmware for USB JTAG programmers

2016-11-28 Thread Stefano Rivera
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stefano Rivera * Package name: ixo-usb-jtag Version : 0.0.0+git20160908 Upstream Author : Tim 'mithro' Ansell * URL : https://github.com/mithro/ixo-usb-jtag * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : Fi

Re: Bits from the Stable Release Managers

2016-11-28 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:11:17PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2016-11-28 14:38, Holger Levsen wrote: > > thanks for this update! > > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:42:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > >* The update must be built in an (old)stable environment or chroot > > > > afaik

Bug#846176: ITP: restic -- restic backup program

2016-11-28 Thread Félix Sipma
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Félix Sipma" * Package name: restic Version : 0.3.0 Upstream Author : Alexander Neumann * URL : https://restic.github.io/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: Go Description : restic is a backup program which allow

Re: Test instance of our infrastructure

2016-11-28 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Ian, On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:04:17PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Should we not have public test instances of all these things ? seems like a great idea, thanks for bringing this up! a few minor comments: > I suggest we should declare (perhaps as a DEP?) or a wiki page, at least at first…?

Re: Bits from the Stable Release Managers

2016-11-28 Thread Iustin Pop
On 2016-11-27 20:42:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >* The bug should be of severity "important" or higher Quick question: assuming all the other conditions are met (minimal patch, clean debdiff, etc.), this seems to discourage normal bugs fixing. Is that intentional (i.e. there must be significant

Re: Let's stop using CVS for debian.org website

2016-11-28 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Sean, 2016-11-28 23:23 GMT+01:00 Sean Whitton : > Hello Bálint, > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 06:33:34PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> It is not a subtree clone, but the result is practically the same > > It wouldn't permit making new commits, though. This is true, those who don't have good acc

Re: Let's stop using CVS for debian.org website

2016-11-28 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Bálint, On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 06:33:34PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: > It is not a subtree clone, but the result is practically the same It wouldn't permit making new commits, though. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: sbuild vs pbuilder (and dgit)

2016-11-28 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:39:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > I have never really understood the point of debuild. It's just a modernising wrapper for dpkg-buildpackage, since that the command line API of dpkg-buildpackage can't be altered. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: P

ITP: golang-github-akavel-rsrc -- Tool for embedding binary resources in Go programs

2016-11-28 Thread liang
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Liang Yan * Package name: golang-github-akavel-rsrc Version : 2+git20151103.6.ba14da1-1 Upstream Author : Mateusz Czapliński * URL : https://github.com/akavel/rsrc * License : MIT Programming Lang: Go Description

Re: [debian-mysql] [MBF] mysql meta-packages

2016-11-28 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Monday, 28 November 2016 21:37:05 CET Robie Basak wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:12:14PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > thank you both for the information, this sounds quite good. I will switch > > to libmariadbclient for stretch. For stretch+1, we'll see how things > > develop upstream.

Re: [debian-mysql] [MBF] mysql meta-packages

2016-11-28 Thread Robie Basak
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:12:14PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > thank you both for the information, this sounds quite good. I will switch to > libmariadbclient for stretch. For stretch+1, we'll see how things develop > upstream. Can you not use default-libmysqlclient-dev and maintain build-tim

Re: [debian-mysql] [MBF] mysql meta-packages

2016-11-28 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Hi Robie, hi Kristian, On Sunday, 27 November 2016 14:11:11 CET Kristian Nielsen wrote: > Future compatibility between MariaDB client library and MySQL server, or > wise versa, is rather more likely than other kinds of compatibility. This is > because there is generally a strong desire to have the

Bug#846159: ITP: dnss -- Tool for encapsulating DNS over HTTPS or GRPC

2016-11-28 Thread Alberto Bertogli (debian)
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alberto Bertogli (debian) * Package name: dnss Version : 0.0~git20161126.0.162090e-1 Upstream Author : Alberto Bertogli * URL : https://blitiri.com.ar/git/r/dnss/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Go Descripti

Bug#846155: ITP: python-distro -- Linux OS platform information API

2016-11-28 Thread Barry Warsaw
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Barry Warsaw -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 * Package name: python-distro Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Nir Cohen * URL : https://github.com/nir0s/distro * License : ASLv2 Programming Lang: Python

Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Certbot in Debian Stretch

2016-11-28 Thread Peter Eckersley
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Peter, there's one more question embedded within what you have already > asked: > > - would new versions of python-certbot and python-acme require new python > libraries? If yes (or maybe), then the answer would be: go with > stretch-

Re: Difference in behaviour between pbuilder and sbuild

2016-11-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Scott Leggett writes ("Difference in behaviour between pbuilder and sbuild"): > I've recently tried using sbuild rather than pbuilder (inspired by a > blog post[0]), and found that the invocation of dh_installdocs differs > between the two tools. My .docs file has this line: ... > The consequence o

sbuild vs pbuilder (and dgit)

2016-11-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Scott Leggett writes ("Difference in behaviour between pbuilder and sbuild"): > I've recently tried using sbuild rather than pbuilder (inspired by a > blog post[0]), > > [0] https://people.debian.org/~stapelberg/2016/11/25/build-tools.html I'm derailing this because I had not seen this blog post

Re: Let's stop using CVS for debian.org website

2016-11-28 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi, 2016-11-24 12:20 GMT+01:00 Jonas Smedegaard : > Quoting Holger Levsen (2016-11-24 10:43:40) >> As some people fear the size of the git repo, I've done a test: >> >> cloning took 5-6min (granted over a fast network connection) and requires >> 628mb of diskspace in the end. >> >> however, clonin

Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Certbot in Debian Stretch

2016-11-28 Thread Peter Eckersley
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 05:37:05PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016, at 13:39, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > So if you, as an upstream maintainer, have a change that is needed for > > > compatibility with changes in networ

Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Certbot in Debian Stretch

2016-11-28 Thread Peter Eckersley
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:48:35PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > Note that per backports rules, $RELEASE_N-backports must track > $RELEASE_N_PLUS_1, so if you remove certbot from Stretch, you'll > also have to remove it from jessie-backports. Thank you for pointing this out Christian. This po

Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Certbot in Debian Stretch

2016-11-28 Thread Peter Eckersley
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:35:46AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Peter Eckersley wrote: > > > currently working with an ACME backwards compatibilty window of 6-12 months, > > but probably not longer than that. > > I note that letsencrypt 0.4.1-1 (before the rename to

Bug#846142: ITP: casacore-data-lines -- Table of spectral lines for casacore

2016-11-28 Thread Ole Streicher
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ole Streicher X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-as...@lists.debian.org * Package name: casacore-data-lines Version : 1.0 * URL : https://github.com/casacore/lines-table * License : CC0 Description :

Re: Bits from the Stable Release Managers

2016-11-28 Thread Julien Cristau
On 11/28/2016 05:18 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:47:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: >> source only uploads work for stretch and up. There are no arch:all >> autobuilders for wheezy and jessie. > > Well, it doesn't even work for stretch, actually. > There are no autobui

Re: Bits from the Stable Release Managers

2016-11-28 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:47:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > source only uploads work for stretch and up. There are no arch:all > autobuilders for wheezy and jessie. ic. does that mean than arch:any only uploads work for wheezy+jessie? -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description

Re: Bits from the Stable Release Managers

2016-11-28 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:47:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > source only uploads work for stretch and up. There are no arch:all > autobuilders for wheezy and jessie. Well, it doesn't even work for stretch, actually. There are no autobuilders for stretch, and dak is rejecting such uploads. -

Re: Let's stop using CVS for debian.org website

2016-11-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: Let's stop using CVS for debian.org website"): > Quoting Holger Levsen (2016-11-24 10:43:40) > > $ git clone --depth 1 https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/webwml/webwml2git.git > > Cloning into 'webwml2git'... > > fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly > > fatal: proto

Re: Bits from the Stable Release Managers

2016-11-28 Thread Julien Cristau
On 11/28/2016 02:38 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Adam, > > thanks for this update! > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:42:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>* The update must be built in an (old)stable environment or chroot > > afaik source only uploads work as well, dont they? (and technicall

Re: Bits from the Stable Release Managers

2016-11-28 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2016-11-28 14:38, Holger Levsen wrote: thanks for this update! On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:42:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: * The update must be built in an (old)stable environment or chroot afaik source only uploads work as well, dont they? (and technically the above obviously incl

Re: Difference in behaviour between pbuilder and sbuild

2016-11-28 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Mattia Rizzolo (2016-11-28 13:39:46) > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:17:21PM +1100, Scott Leggett wrote: > > But that means that pbuilder is carrying my local environment over to the > > build environment - so the build environment is no longer pristine. Is > > that behaviour intentional

Re: Bits from the Stable Release Managers

2016-11-28 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Adam, thanks for this update! On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:42:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >* The update must be built in an (old)stable environment or chroot afaik source only uploads work as well, dont they? (and technically the above obviously includes this, but I think it would be

Bug#846095: ITP: ruby-useragent --HTTP User Agent parser

2016-11-28 Thread Abhijith PA
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Abhijith PA X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: ruby-useragent Version : 0.16.8 Upstream Author : Garry Shutler * URL : https://github.com/gshutler/useragent * License : Expact Programming Lang:

Re: Using clean build scripts from pkg-ruby-extras repo

2016-11-28 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 at 12:57:35 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Features: > 1. It will build in a clean chroot using sbuild, > 2. it will run autopkgtest in an lxc container, > 3. it will offer to run autopkgtest of any or all reverse dependencies, > 4. it will also offer to rebuild all or any rever

Re: Difference in behaviour between pbuilder and sbuild

2016-11-28 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:17:21PM +1100, Scott Leggett wrote: > No offence intended - I've used pbuilder for quite a while and was just > trying a different tool. :) None taken :) > But that means that pbuilder is carrying my local environment over to > the build environment - so the build envir

Re: Difference in behaviour between pbuilder and sbuild

2016-11-28 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016, at 11:09, Johannes Schauer wrote: > If you really somehow export DH_ALWAYS_EXCLUDE somewhere, then the reason Then that package is subtly broken :-) When one needs DH_ALWAYS_EXCLUDE for a build to work, that's fine: it is there to be used... but it has to be set and exporte

Re: Difference in behaviour between pbuilder and sbuild

2016-11-28 Thread Scott Leggett
On 2016-11-28.12:06, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > [ disclaimer: pbuilder maintainer here - totally biased ] > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 09:52:39PM +1100, Scott Leggett wrote: > > (inspired by a blog post[0]), > > [0] https://people.debian.org/~stapelberg/2016/11/25/build-tools.html > > I'll only say

Re: Difference in behaviour between pbuilder and sbuild

2016-11-28 Thread Johannes Schauer
[ disclaimer: sbuild maintainer here - totally biased ] Quoting Mattia Rizzolo (2016-11-28 12:06:19) > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 09:52:39PM +1100, Scott Leggett wrote: > > (inspired by a blog post[0]), [0] > > https://people.debian.org/~stapelberg/2016/11/25/build-tools.html > I'll only say that 1)

Test instance of our infrastructure

2016-11-28 Thread Ian Jackson
We are running a multitude of services. Our usual approach to these services is that we fix things when they break, test our client code against the live instance (with perhaps a special area of the database - eg the `experimental' suite). I have found writing server-side software in this environ

Re: Difference in behaviour between pbuilder and sbuild

2016-11-28 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
[ disclaimer: pbuilder maintainer here - totally biased ] On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 09:52:39PM +1100, Scott Leggett wrote: > (inspired by a blog post[0]), > [0] https://people.debian.org/~stapelberg/2016/11/25/build-tools.html I'll only say that 1) I fail to see where is this extrem complications

Difference in behaviour between pbuilder and sbuild

2016-11-28 Thread Scott Leggett
Hi, I've recently tried using sbuild rather than pbuilder (inspired by a blog post[0]), and found that the invocation of dh_installdocs differs between the two tools. My .docs file has this line: doc/mpls/ However this directory also contains a .gitignore file. sbuild's invocation of dh_instal

E ai, Vai Encarar?

2016-11-28 Thread Pague Menos
html {width: 100%} body {background-color: #ff; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;} Especial Corridinha Pague Menos - Caso não esteja visualizando as imagens, acesse aqui Os produtos podem sofrer variação

ABI changes analysis for the new releases of the Linux kernel

2016-11-28 Thread Ponomarenko Andrey
Hello, This is a tracker of ABI changes in the new upstream releases of the Linux kernel (defconfig, x86_64): https://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/timeline/linux/ The tracker performs backward binary compatibility analysis of all public exported symbols and data types (declared in the ".ksymtab"