Re: Usage of DEP5

2019-11-07 Thread Mo Zhou
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 08:33:23AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > Andreas Tille writes: > > I would love to see another discussion here to reach more uniformity in > > Debian packaging and rise importance of DEP5 by recommending it in > > Debian Policy. > > I would really support that. A recommend

Getting people of different teams together

2019-11-07 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi Steve, thanks for such a nicely written report (Summary of the Secure Boot BoF at DC19)! What I want to comment on: On 21.10.19 03:36, Steve McIntyre wrote: > The awkward bits > > > Time > > It's taken a *very* long time to get this into Debian. We've been > talking ab

Bug#944299: ITP: phylonium -- Fast and Accurate Estimation of Evolutionary Distances

2019-11-07 Thread Fabian Kloetzl
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Fabian Klötzl * Package name: phylonium Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Fabian Klötzl * URL : https://github.com/evolbioinf/phylonium * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : Fast and Accurate Estimati

Nie masz pomysłu na nowy post? Poprowadzimy Twój FanPage.

2019-11-07 Thread Jan Żak . Twój Skuteczny FanPage .
Dzień dobry, *kreowanie wizerunku* oraz *pozyskiwanie klientów* na *Facebooku* to nasza specjalność. Dobra reklama jest dźwignią handlu - zwłaszcza we współczesnym świecie. Wystarczy przesłać odpowiedź o treści *"TAK"* - a na pewno się z Państwem skontaktujemy. ..

Re: Usage of DEP5

2019-11-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Andreas Tille dixit: >explicit wish to not use DEP5. I wonder what other reasons might exist >to explicitly stick to the non-machine readable format. I prefer human-readable format. I also often deal in software which has more… flexibility than the DEP 5 format allows, or where it is plain simpl

Re: [confirmation] Summary: Git Packaging Round 2 [plus weak vs strong team ownership question/proposal]

2019-11-07 Thread Sam Hartman
I think we have enough confirmations to move forward. There are a couple. of last call comments/question that need answers, and then as facilitator, I'll write up a d-d-a post. I'd like to see a round 3 focusing on branch format and stuff. Before proposing a timeline for that, I recommend that we

Re: Usage of DEP5

2019-11-07 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 08:33:23AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > > @Andreas: Independently of how this goes for the Debian Policy, > recommending DEP5 would be a good thing for the policies of Debian > Science and friends (astro, med). I have not checked but I'd say every Debian Med package has D

Re: Secureboot: how to use MOK

2019-11-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 03:04:16AM +0100, Ansgar wrote: > Steve Langasek writes: > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 10:45:49AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Thomas Goirand: > >> I don't think secure boot provides any benefit at all if you store the > >> kernel module signing key on the same machine.

Work-needing packages report for Nov 8, 2019

2019-11-07 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 1256 (new: 0) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 249 (new: 0) Total number of packages reques

Re: Usage of DEP5

2019-11-07 Thread Richard Laager
On 11/7/19 7:40 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > I also often deal in software which > has more… flexibility than the DEP 5 format allows, or where it is > plain simpler. Would you be willing to share an example, at a minimum just the name of the package? -- Richard