-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 23:09:46 +0100
Source: streamlink
Architecture: source
Version: 2.1.1-1~exp1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alexis Murzeau
Changed-By: Alexis Murzeau
Changes:
streamlink (2.1.1-1~exp1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:40:55 +0800
Source: magma
Binary: libmagma-dev libmagma-doc libmagma-sparse2 libmagma-sparse2-dbgsym
libmagma-test libmagma-test-dbgsym libmagma2 libmagma2-dbgsym
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 02:05:50 +0100
Source: h5py
Architecture: source
Version: 3.2.1-1exp1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Changed-By: Drew Parsons
Changes:
h5py (3.2.1-1exp1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:36:02 +0100
Source: barbican
Architecture: source
Version: 1:12.0.0~rc1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OpenStack
Changed-By: Thomas Goirand
Changes:
barbican (1:12.0.0~rc1-1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 07:24:34 +0900
Source: kglobalaccel
Architecture: source
Version: 5.80.0-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
Changed-By: Norbert Preining
Changes:
kglobalaccel
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:43:27PM +0100, Yadd wrote:
> Le 26/03/2021 à 22:38, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > I just learned that what was formerly something like
> >
> > .*/archive/
> >
> > became now
> >
> > .*/archive/refs/tags/
> >
> > This breaks at least all Debian Med packages
I'm asking both of you, and everyone else for that matter, to keep this
off of debian-devel. We're freezing for release, this is debian-devel,
not twitter, if you have disagreements to figure out, please do it
elsewhere.
This makes sense, but unfortunately the email on debian-announce went
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:21:49 +0100
Source: scipy
Architecture: source
Version: 1.6.2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Team
Changed-By: Drew Parsons
Closes: 967977 983404
Changes:
scipy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 00:02:47 +0100
Source: designate
Architecture: source
Version: 1:12.0.0~rc1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OpenStack
Changed-By: Thomas Goirand
Changes:
designate
Hi,
> The problem is that for good reason, we no longer trust the FSF under
> its current governance to do that. What you are affectively asking
> people to do is to pursue justice in regard to things rms did in a forum
> where rms has much more power than they do and where rms (and the voting
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 22:45:34 +
Source: fossil
Architecture: source
Version: 1:2.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Barak A. Pearlmutter
Changed-By: Barak A. Pearlmutter
Changes:
fossil (1:2.15-1) unstable;
Russ Allbery wrote...
> I think there's a bit of subtlety here in that if upstream uses a key with
> an expiration that they periodically extend (to provide a time-based
> cut-off if they lose control of the key for whatever reason, for
> instance), and that package is rarely updated because it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:37:15 +0100
Source: netty
Architecture: source
Version: 1:4.1.48-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
Changed-By: Markus Koschany
Closes: 984948
Changes:
netty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 07:26:39 +0900
Source: kglobalaccel
Architecture: source
Version: 5.78.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
Changed-By: Norbert Preining
Changes:
kglobalaccel
Le 26/03/2021 à 22:38, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I just learned that what was formerly something like
>
>https://github.com/#GITHUBUSER#/#PACKAGE#/releases/latest
> .*/archive/#PREFIX#@ANY_VERSION@\.tar\.gz
>
> has to be
>
>
Hi Timo,
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 10:55:14PM +0100, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> * Andreas Tille [2021-03-26 22:38]:
> > https://github.com/#GITHUBUSER#/#PACKAGE#/releases/latest
> > .*/archive.*/#PREFIX#@ANY_VERSION@\.tar\.gz
>
> As .* also matches forward slashes, I use
>
>
Hi Andreas,
* Andreas Tille [2021-03-26 22:38]:
https://github.com/#GITHUBUSER#/#PACKAGE#/releases/latest
.*/archive.*/#PREFIX#@ANY_VERSION@\.tar\.gz
As .* also matches forward slashes, I use
https://github.com/#GITHUBUSER#/#PACKAGE#/releases/latest
.*/#PREFIX#@ANY_VERSION@\.tar\.gz
Hi,
I just learned that what was formerly something like
https://github.com/#GITHUBUSER#/#PACKAGE#/releases/latest
.*/archive/#PREFIX#@ANY_VERSION@\.tar\.gz
has to be
https://github.com/#GITHUBUSER#/#PACKAGE#/releases/latest
.*/archive.*/#PREFIX#@ANY_VERSION@\.tar\.gz
now (at least)
Timo Röhling writes:
> * Russ Allbery [2021-03-26 13:01]:
>> If this were the case, it would be fine to re-sign *.dsc files, but
>> there has been quite a lot of opposition to that in the past. The
>> upstream signing key is at least as useful as the signature on the
>> *.dsc file, for exactly
* Russ Allbery [2021-03-26 13:01]:
Personally, I'd be happy to drop the upstream signing keys from all of my
packages and save a bit of work. I never use them as the package
maintainer because I'm the only upstream of my packaging that signs
packages, and therefore I already know the tarballs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 20:47:45 +
Source: rust-sniffglue
Architecture: source
Version: 0.11.1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Rust Maintainers
Changed-By: Peter Michael Green
Closes: 985858
Changes:
* Russ Allbery [2021-03-26 13:01]:
If this were the case, it would be fine to re-sign *.dsc files, but there
has been quite a lot of opposition to that in the past. The upstream
signing key is at least as useful as the signature on the *.dsc file, for
exactly the same reasons.
I do not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 21:09:26 +0100
Source: uif
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.9-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Mike Gabriel
Changed-By: Mike Gabriel
Closes: 985925 985927
Changes:
uif (1.1.9-3) unstable;
On 2021/03/26 21:22, Michael Shigorin wrote:
> Jonathan, I hereby demand that the Debian Project gets rid
> of this manipulative, insultive, divisive and libelous member.
> He (them? it?) can't even stand by the rules (pro|im)posed.
I'm asking both of you, and everyone else for that matter, to
Hi,
Please descalate, it is an emergency. The RMS debate is very difficult
for many people I guess, painful or, at least, energy consumer. It often
results to ghoughts about the compliance of some mails with the code of
conduct. But those 2 mails are clearly not acceptable from the formal
Timo Röhling writes:
> Once the package has been uploaded, it does no longer make a difference
> whether or not the upstream package was signed in the first place: any
> package will be protected by the Debian archive keys anyway.
If this were the case, it would be fine to re-sign *.dsc files,
On 2021-03-26 09:35:31 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
> We do have a trusted timestamp for the point at which the upstream
> tarball and signature were uploaded to the Debian archive, though,
> so if the key had not yet expired at that point, I think we can
> infer it wasn't expired when
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:23:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:14:16PM +0300, Michael Shigorin wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:18:19AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > You absolutely have NO right to speak for all of the community
> > ..so do go and
* Russ Allbery [2021-03-26 09:35]:
We do have a trusted timestamp for the point at which the upstream tarball
and signature were uploaded to the Debian archive, though, so if the key
had not yet expired at that point, I think we can infer it wasn't expired
when the signature was made.
Once the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:45:07 -0400
Source: spip
Architecture: source
Version: 3.2.11-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: David Prévot
Changed-By: David Prévot
Changes:
spip (3.2.11-1) experimental;
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:18:19AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 10:52:52AM +0300, Michael Shigorin wrote:
> > > He has shown himself to be misogynist, ableist, and
> > > transphobic, among other serious accusations of impropriety.
> > > These sorts of beliefs have no
On 26/03/2021 18:14, jathan wrote:
Hi,
Regardless of supporting Richard Stallman or not returning to the FSF,
its organisational structure and its way of taking decisions, what is
certain is that this situation will cause division, hatred and grudge
within different Free Software communities
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:14:19PM -0600, jathan wrote:
> I propose that in a personal way those who want to sign or not sign any
> of the letters, go ahead, but that no public statement be made on behalf
> of the Debian Project in an official way.
Such amendment was already proposed, you can
Hi,
Regardless of supporting Richard Stallman or not returning to the FSF,
its organisational structure and its way of taking decisions, what is
certain is that this situation will cause division, hatred and grudge
within different Free Software communities and that will be the most
harmful thing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:44:51 +0300
Source: erlang
Architecture: source
Version: 1:24.0~rc2+dfsg-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Erlang Packagers
Changed-By: Sergei Golovan
Changes:
erlang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:31:46 -0400
Source: tidy-html5
Architecture: source
Version: 2:5.7.45-1~exp1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Tidy HTML5
Changed-By: Boyuan Yang
Changes:
tidy-html5 (2:5.7.45-1~exp1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:06:53 +
Source: dbus-glib
Architecture: source
Version: 0.112-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Utopia Maintenance Team
Changed-By: Simon McVittie
Closes: 981653
Changes:
dbus-glib
Le vendredi 26 mars 2021 à 11:46:10+0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit :
> Le vendredi 26 mars 2021 à 11:05:26+0100, Dominik George a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > > A General Resolution has been started about Richard Stallman's
> > > readmission to the FSF board.
> > >
> > > It currently has 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 18:03:24 +0100
Source: python-oauth2client
Architecture: source
Version: 4.1.3-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OpenStack
Changed-By: Thomas Goirand
Changes:
python-oauth2client
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:35:19 +
Source: metkit
Architecture: source
Version: 1.7.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry
Changed-By: Alastair McKinstry
Changes:
metkit (1.7.0-1) unstable;
Dear Timothy,
Le vendredi 26 mars 2021 à 11:01:14-0400, Timothy M Butterworth a écrit :
> The FSF with out RMS would be like the Linux Foundations with out
> Linus. With their personality quirks it is sometimes hard for some
> people to like them but at the end of the day they get the job done.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:01:11 +
Source: odc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry
Changed-By: Alastair McKinstry
Changes:
odc (1.3.0-1) unstable;
> "Dominik" == Dominik George writes:
Dominik> With all due respect to everyone who has been offended by
Dominik> Richard Stallman, feels oppressed by him, or is negatively
Dominik> affected by his views — every single such person has to be
Dominik> heard, their fears and
Ansgar writes:
> On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 09:06 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I'm not all that familiar with the intended semantics of OpenPGP key
>> expirations, but intuitively I think a signature made before the
>> expiration should be considered valid, even if the key has now expired
>> and
On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 09:06 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'm not all that familiar with the intended semantics of OpenPGP key
> expirations, but intuitively I think a signature made before the
> expiration should be considered valid, even if the key has now
> expired and thus shouldn't be used to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:38:48 +0100
Binary: dwarf-fortress dwarf-fortress-data
Source: dwarf-fortress
Architecture: all amd64 i386 source
Version: 0.47.05-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Bartscher
Timothy M Butterworth writes:
> The FSF with out RMS would be like the Linux Foundations with out
> Linus.
To me, and I dare guess, to most people, the actions of RMS are not
being weighted against the important contributions he has made. Many of
us believe that he has crossed certain lines
Christoph Biedl writes:
> Of course I understand there are various reasons why this happens, and
> several are not the maintainer's fault. But at least in some cases it's
> obvious the maintainers didn't care: When there has been an upload with
> a new upstream version released after the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:38:34 +
Source: debmutate
Architecture: source
Version: 0.30
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jelmer Vernooij
Changed-By: Jelmer Vernooij
Changes:
debmutate (0.30) unstable; urgency=medium
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:31:52 +
Source: debmutate
Architecture: source
Version: 0.29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jelmer Vernooij
Changed-By: Jelmer Vernooij
Changes:
debmutate (0.29) unstable; urgency=medium
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nilesh Patra
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nil...@debian.org
* Package name: nthash
Version : 2.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Hamid Mohamadi
* URL : https://github.com/bcgsc/ntHash
* License : Expat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:08:08 +
Source: magics++
Architecture: source
Version: 4.6.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry
Changed-By: Alastair McKinstry
Closes: 984233
Changes:
magics++
The FSF with out RMS would be like the Linux Foundations with out
Linus. With their personality quirks it is sometimes hard for some
people to like them but at the end of the day they get the job done.
RMS has done alot for FLOSS it would be sad to see his contributions
come to a halt but he can
Le vendredi 26 mars 2021 à 16:50:06+0300, Sergey B Kirpichev a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 02:08:34PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> > I'm not trying to refrain you from leaving
>
> Well, lets I'll try last time to make things clear as much as I can.
>
> 1) Don't get me wrong, this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:15:20 +0100
Source: webkit2gtk
Architecture: source
Version: 2.32.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian WebKit Maintainers
Changed-By: Alberto Garcia
Closes: 984522
Changes:
> 2) It's not something like "this hurts me, please do Debian
>great again - or I'll leave". I'm not in the camp of SJW's and won't
>share their methods.
You're right, it's more something like "mimimi, I will leave now
because I want to make a point, maybe try to come back later, but in
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 02:08:34PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> I'm not trying to refrain you from leaving
Well, lets I'll try last time to make things clear as much as I can.
1) Don't get me wrong, this is the end of story, started not today.
2) It's not something like "this hurts me,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:24:52 +0100
Source: rabbitmq-server
Architecture: source
Version: 3.8.9-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OpenStack
Changed-By: Thomas Goirand
Closes: 947873
Changes:
rabbitmq-server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:15:42 +
Source: eccodes
Architecture: source
Version: 2.21.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry
Changed-By: Alastair McKinstry
Changes:
eccodes (2.21.0-1) unstable;
Seconded.
José Vieira
- Mensagem de Dominik George -
Data: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:05:26 +0100
De: Dominik George
Assunto: Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to
the FSF board
Para: debian-v...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
A General Resolution has been
Le vendredi 26 mars 2021 à 08:22:05+0300, Sergey B Kirpichev a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I don't want to be associated with the organization, being part of the
> witch hunt like this one https://rms-open-letter.github.io/.
> Unfortunately, it seems the only option to be not involved in all
> that -
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sudip Mukherjee
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: wiredpanda
Version : v3.0.0
Upstream Author : Davi Morales, Fábio Cappabianco, Lucas Lellis, Rodrigo
Torres and Vinícius Miguel
* URL :
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:50:31AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> [replying only to -vote - please avoid cross-posting!]
OK, but you actually replied only to -devel instead of -vote.
>
> Quoting Dominik George (2021-03-26 11:05:26)
> > Hi,
> >
> > > A General Resolution has been started
That letter is an hysteric attack toward free software, the FSF, GNU, and RMS
in particular. Gratuitous charges against RMS look totally undocumented and
unexcused.
Please see:
An orthodox analysis entitled Justice for Dr. Richard Matthew Stallman, which
recaps the whole story.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 08:14:26 +
Source: osk-sdl
Architecture: source
Version: 0.62.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: DebianOnMobile Maintainers
Changed-By: Jarrah Gosbell
Changes:
osk-sdl (0.62.1-2)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 20:29:44 +0200
Source: openstack-trove
Architecture: source
Version: 1:14.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OpenStack
Changed-By: Thomas Goirand
Changes:
openstack-trove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 22:49:00 +1000
Source: network-manager-l2tp
Architecture: source
Version: 1.8.6-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Douglas Kosovic
Changed-By: Douglas Kosovic
Changes:
network-manager-l2tp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:01:39 +0100
Source: chatty
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.0~beta-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: DebianOnMobile Maintainers
Changed-By: Evangelos Ribeiro Tzaras
Changes:
chatty
[replying only to -vote - please avoid cross-posting!]
Quoting Dominik George (2021-03-26 11:05:26)
> Hi,
>
> > A General Resolution has been started about Richard Stallman's
> > readmission to the FSF board.
> >
> > It currently has 1 available options, but other proposals have been
> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peymaneh Nejad
* Package name: golang-github-aryann-difflib-dev
Version : 0.0~git20170710.e206f87-1
Upstream Author : Aryan Naraghi
* URL : https://github.com/aryann/difflib
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Le vendredi 26 mars 2021 à 11:05:26+0100, Dominik George a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> > A General Resolution has been started about Richard Stallman's
> > readmission to the FSF board.
> >
> > It currently has 1 available options, but other proposals have been
> > suggested.
>
> I explicitly do NOT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:06:40 +0100
Source: placement
Architecture: source
Version: 5.0.0~rc1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OpenStack
Changed-By: Thomas Goirand
Changes:
placement (5.0.0~rc1-1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:01:12 +0100
Source: nova
Architecture: source
Version: 2:23.0.0~rc1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OpenStack
Changed-By: Thomas Goirand
Changes:
nova (2:23.0.0~rc1-1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:34:18 +0900
Source: calibre
Architecture: source
Version: 5.14.0+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Calibre maintainer team
Changed-By: YOKOTA Hiroshi
Changes:
calibre (5.14.0+dfsg-1)
Hi,
> A General Resolution has been started about Richard Stallman's
> readmission to the FSF board.
>
> It currently has 1 available options, but other proposals have been suggested.
I explicitly do NOT support this GR.
My opinion, as laid out at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:58:03 +
Source: xdmf
Architecture: source
Version: 3.0+git20190531-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry
Changed-By: Alastair McKinstry
Closes: 985879
Changes:
xdmf
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> PS: Those who want to argue lintian should for check for such expired
> key, I couldn't agree more. Please read the discussion in #985793 first.
Sorry, that should have been #964971.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 09:35:37 +
Source: diffoscope
Built-For-Profiles: nocheck
Architecture: source
Version: 171
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks
Changed-By: Chris Lamb
Changes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 19:56:05 +
Source: eckit
Architecture: source
Version: 1.16.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry
Changed-By: Alastair McKinstry
Changes:
eckit (1.16.0-1) unstable;
Hello,
a few days ago, I ran uscan on a package where I knew there was a new
upstream version - just to encounter an validation error since the
keys in debian/upstream/signing-key.asc had expired.
After that, things escalated a little, and eventually I wrote a script
that downloads d/u/s-k for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:11:19 +0100
Source: nix
Architecture: source
Version: 2.3.10+dfsg1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Thomas Koch
Changed-By: Thomas Koch
Closes: 970874
Changes:
nix (2.3.10+dfsg1-1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:33:42 -0700
Source: waffle
Architecture: source
Version: 1.7.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jordan Justen
Changed-By: Jordan Justen
Changes:
waffle (1.7.0-1) experimental;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:12:36 +0100
Source: btrfs-progs
Architecture: source
Version: 5.11.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Adam Borowski
Changed-By: Adam Borowski
Changes:
btrfs-progs (5.11.1-1)
Hi,
I'm a disabled person and I think that calling rms an "ableist" for what
he wrote about prenatal diagnosis is incorrect.
It shows that the author of the letter knows NOTHING about what goes on
in groups for civil liberties of disabled people and their families.
In my country, Italy, it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:55:22 +0530
Source: ruby-licensee
Architecture: source
Version: 9.14.1-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Team
Changed-By: Pirate Praveen
Closes: 985799
Changes:
85 matches
Mail list logo
