]] Bill Allombert
> The rationale is that the only info really leaked is the package name,
> so it only make sense to hide a package if every system that have it
> installed are also hiding it, so it is better to make it a property
> of the package than of the system.
I think it'd make more sens
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:lizardfs
Please remove "lizardfs" from "unstable".
The package is no longer properly maintained upstream and it FTBFS here
in Debian.
Thanks.
LizardFS users should migrate to MooseFS.
-
On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 07:19:34AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> For the record, I gave up on the survey about half way through because
> it refused to let me advance without giving an answer to one of the
> questions. Consider this feedback on the survey design.
for the record, I gave up on the s
On 04/05/2022 19:43, Russ Allbery wrote:
I don't know if it currently does this, but it would be useful for popcon
to show counts for public third-party packages that aren't in the archive.
See
https://popcon.debian.org/unknown/by_recent
Cheers,
Peter
Philipp Kern writes:
> I like the idea, especially for organizations who know what they are
> doing[1]. I just fear that it won't actually solve your denylisting
> problem at hand. People will keep not specifying it. Can't popcon go and
> just accept reports for packages in the archive somehow?
Hi,
On 2022-05-04 18:21, Bill Allombert wrote:
I plan to add support for 'XB-Popcon-Reports: no' to
popularity-contest.
This allows to build packages with private names that will not be
reported to popcon, by adding 'XB-Popcon-Reports: no' to
debian/control.
This must not used by packages in
Le mercredi 04 mai 2022 à 10:12 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Bill Allombert writes:
>
> > I plan to add support for 'XB-Popcon-Reports: no' to popularity-
> > contest.
> > This allows to build packages with private names that will not be
> > reported to popcon, by adding 'XB-Popcon-Reports: no
Bill Allombert writes:
> I plan to add support for 'XB-Popcon-Reports: no' to popularity-contest.
> This allows to build packages with private names that will not be
> reported to popcon, by adding 'XB-Popcon-Reports: no' to debian/control.
> This must not used by packages in the debian archive,
Dear Debian developers,
I plan to add support for 'XB-Popcon-Reports: no' to popularity-contest.
This allows to build packages with private names that will not be
reported to popcon, by adding 'XB-Popcon-Reports: no' to debian/control.
This must not used by packages in the debian archive, however
On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 01:49:01PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * David Bremner: " Re: Reminder to participate in the Debian Developer's
> Survey" (Wed, 04 May 2022 07:19:34 -0300):
>
> > Utkarsh Gupta writes:
> >
> > > A couple of days back we had invited all the Debian Developers to
> > >
* David Bremner: " Re: Reminder to participate in the Debian Developer's
Survey" (Wed, 04 May 2022 07:19:34 -0300):
> Utkarsh Gupta writes:
>
> > A couple of days back we had invited all the Debian Developers to
> > participate in a survey[1] about the usage of money in Debian that
> > we disc
Utkarsh Gupta writes:
> A couple of days back we had invited all the Debian Developers to
> participate in a survey[1] about the usage of money in Debian that
> we discussed[2] a couple of months back on debian-project@l.d.o.
>
> This is just a follow-up reminder to the same. So far we've roughly
Am Wed, May 04, 2022 at 08:02:51AM +0200 schrieb Johannes Schauer Marin
Rodrigues:
> During my last round of mass-rebuilds I unfortunately didn't apply this
> heuristic and stumbled across src:ants. In contrast to Andreas, I think that
> even packages without a maintainer upload for >10 years shou
13 matches
Mail list logo
