Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Meng-Yuan Huang
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, m...@live.com
* Package name: cbetar2
Version : 19.2.1
Upstream Author : Meng-Yuan Huang
* URL : https://github.com/MrMYHuang/cbetar2
* License : MIT
Program
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 21:34:39 CEST Michael Tokarev wrote:
> What's up with ISC dhclient?
"ISC DHCP Client and Relay End of Maintenance" @
https://www.isc.org/blogs/dhcp-client-relay-eom/
Couple of quotes:
"ISC plans to end maintenance of the ISC DHCP client and relay by the end of
Q1, 2022."
On 2022-05-08 2:07 p.m., Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
and what the implications are for d
On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 08:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > [apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete
> fail]
>
> > I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
> > alternatives are
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> [apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
> I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
> alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
> and
08.05.2022 18:24, Michael Stone wrote:
[apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
and what the implications are for
On 2022-05-08 21:15:07 +0200 (+0200), Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> OpenBSD maintains its own fork of dhclient, just to list another
> alternative.
[...]
Though OpenBSD added dhcpleased[*] last year, so I expect dhclient's
days there are numbered too.
[*] http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article;s
El 08/05/22 a las 11:24, Michael Stone escribió:
> [apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
>
> I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
> alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
> and what the imp
Hi Michael,
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> So what's the path forward, maintaining compatibility and not breaking
> systems upgrading from current stable? Do we come up with a dhcpcd5 variant
> that *only* touches interfaces it is directed to touch via
> /etc/netw
[apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client
(that alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality
of ifupdown and what the implications are for debian upgrades
generally.
isc-dhcp
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 01:41:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>...
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:07:52PM +0200, la...@debian.org wrote:
> > I'm using NIS since 20+ years in a small network with about 60 computers.
> > Since I manage all computers and the physical network can be seen as secure
> >
11 matches
Mail list logo
