Accepted lmod 5.8-1 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:45:19 -0600 Source: lmod Binary: lmod Architecture: source all Version: 5.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org Changed-By: Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org Description

Accepted lmod 5.6.2-1 (source all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 17:57:30 -0500 Source: lmod Binary: lmod Architecture: source all Version: 5.6.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org Changed-By: Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org Description

Accepted lmod 5.5.1-1 (source all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 00:05:23 -0600 Source: lmod Binary: lmod Architecture: source all Version: 5.5.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org Changed-By: Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org Description

Accepted lua-term 0.03.20140426.g1ba9a8e-1 (source amd64)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 14:33:23 -0500 Source: lua-term Binary: lua-term lua-term-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.03.20140426.g1ba9a8e-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org Changed

Re: goals for hardening Debian: ideas and help wanted

Hi Kevin, Kevin Chadwick wrote: Debian developers not being able to upload security fixes is part of the mix but then I would guess you could more easily bring down the TOR network too than a private VPN and filtering would be much more difficult so I would say TOR is not *optimum* for

Re: goals for hardening Debian: ideas and help wanted

Kevin Chadwick wrote: I'm confused, what? How does Tor lower security and at the same time, it provides privacy? Just like antivirus scanners bring greater exploitability especially if you are not vulnerable to detectable viruses then so does Tor. What?! I don't even,.. It adds a lot of

Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian

Hi Kevin, Kevin Chadwick wrote: However I do believe Debian and Linux should be doing a lot more outside of grsec/pax/gentoo hardened. I could be wrong but I'm under the impression that Ubuntu is ahead (maybe just as more bleeding edge and PAE by default etc. though I am surprised they

Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian

Hi Balint, Balint Reczey wrote: Hi, I have posted the following idea on my blog [7] to get comments from people not on this list, but obviously this is the mailing list where the proposal should be discussed. :-) I generally agree with your concerns. But I have to concur that hardening the

Re: Proposing amd64-hardened architecture for Debian

Hi Balint, Bálint Réczey wrote: The upstream project I'm most involved in is Wireshark where we try to employ most of the state of the art techniques for improving code quality but I think the Wireshark project is in much better position than most other projects. Thanks to dedicated team and

Bug#743966: ITP: lua-term -- a Lua module for manipulating a terminal

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org * Package name: lua-term Version : 0.03 Upstream Author : Rob Hoelz r...@hoelzro.net * URL : https://github.com/hoelzro/lua-term * License : MIT Programming Lang: Lua Description : a Lua

Bug#743823: ITP: lmod -- Lua environment modules

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org * Package name: lmod Version : 5.3.2 Upstream Author : Robert McLay * URL : https://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/lmod * License : MIT Programming Lang: Lua Description : Lua