On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 12:58:25PM +0300, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:44:02PM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote:
> BA> I intend to package ncurses-ruby, which is a ruby extension for the
> BA> ncurses C library. It is placed under the LGPL 2.1. It's requi
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to package ncurses-ruby, which is a ruby extension for the ncurses C
library.
It is placed under the LGPL 2.1. It's required by raggle.
http://ncurses-ruby.berlios.de
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
System Administrator, Core Messaging Systems
aggle has been tested under Linux and OpenBSD, and
should
work properly under other Unix variants as well."
http://www.raggle.org
--
Brian Almeida | http://tynian.net| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer | http://www.debian.org| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: MythDead
:%( address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:%( away : Yes, I know its out, leave me the fuck alone
Bad move...
--
Brian Almeida | http://people.debian.org/~bma
Debian Developer | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t; it, I reverted to test10. Anyone running 2.4.0 could tell you).
> Thus, it would die immediately for me.
flags was changed to features in test11, and was reverted back to
flags in test12 (and later).
--
Brian Almeida | http://www.debian.org/~bma
Debian Developer | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
source packages - for example,
> for libdb2-util, the URL given above returns "No such changelog file".
>
> Any other ideas how to do this?
apt-cache show $package|grep Source
Then use that value in the url (in this case db)
--
Brian Almeida | http://
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 09:57:41AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> I don't think explorer is sufficient justification to keep qt1 in woody.
I wasn't implying it was. I was just saying it needs to be fixed, or
removed.
--
Brian M. Almeida
Linux Systems Engineer | http://www.winstar.com | [EMAIL PROT
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 04:16:03AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'd like to remove qt1 from woody. I only seem to find 1 package that
> depends on it currently (tuxeyes) and due to the fact that it's non-free
> and qt2 is out with a gpl'd license and all, I think we should discou
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 05:48:17PM +0200, Samuel Hocevar wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2000, Brian Almeida wrote:
> > Skipstone is a GTK+ webbrowser that uses mozilla's embed features. It is
> > similar to galeon only it is pure GTK+, no GNOME. The author asked me to
> >
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:42:56AM -0400, Peter Teichman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:03:07AM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote:
> > Skipstone is a GTK+ webbrowser that uses mozilla's embed features. It is
> > similar to galeon only it is pure GTK+, no GNOME. The author
Skipstone is a GTK+ webbrowser that uses mozilla's embed features. It is
similar to galeon only it is pure GTK+, no GNOME. The author asked me to
make packages of it, and I have uploaded it into Debian. It is placed under
the GPL. See http://www.muhri.net/skipstone/ for more info.
--
Brian M.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 04:32:38PM -0700, Michael Meskes wrote:
> It's still mention in Suggests: etc. but the package is not listed in
> the Packages files anymore. Just a temporary situation or a real problem?
prc-tools (0.5.0r-3.1) frozen; urgency=low
* NMU
* Specify the archs (excluding sp
...or maybe not. It's got cryptographic hashing algos (tiger, sha1, etc), so
I probably can't package it due to wonderful US laws. Drat.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 08:12:37PM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote:
> I'll do this, since it relates to my work. :-)
>
> On Mon, Mar 27,
NSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brian Almeida
Debian Developer | http://www.debian.org
Linux Systems Engineer @ Winstar | http://www.winstar.com
; generations in internet time), we have fastr become a distribution
> that does not meet the needs of a vast number of people.
I believe slink was released Mar 9, so we are just over a year, not 18
months (so we are only 2 generations behind ;)
--
Brian Almeida
Debian Developer
ICQnix is a clone of ICQ intended to resemble the Mirabilis client as
much as possible. It is placed under the GPL, with the exception that
it may be linked to Qt. I will upload in a day or so if no one objects
(I searched the archives and wnpp and didn't see anyone had dibs on this,
but if I mis
o. This
> is to prevent others from possibly investigating the source with an
> eye towards taking over maintenance.
Ah, I see. I must have missed that message. In this case, yes, I'd say
"Ok, this guy has it now, thanks for the help", which most people do right
now anyways (
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 10:26:11PM -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> You are subscribed to a mailing list debian-devel, aren't you?
Nag also sends emails regarding old bugs on your packages. I never
subscribed to that. :p
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian L
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 09:28:33PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> So where's the problem with getting an reminder about your old open
> bugs, which you need to fix?
I don't NEED a reminder about my bugs. There should be an option to TURN THE
BLOODY
THING OFF.
--
Brian Almeida &
e to think the same of most maintainers out there. Often times if
there's
an old bug, it's either because it's fixed and forgotten to be closed,
unreproducable, or the package/maintainer author feel it not to be a bug - but
leave it open so it won't get reported over and over.
--
bugs - yet from what I understand, he can't possibly go through that
list
until some modifications are done to the BTS. 'Nag' also goes to developers
personally, not only to -devel.
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Systems Administrator
CICAT Networks - The New Br
new maintainers, just mark
something like '* New maintainer' in the changelog.
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Systems Administrator
CICAT Networks - The New Brand of Telecommunications Service
Web: http://www.cicat.com/ V: 703-383-1408
email: [EMAIL PR
fdisk'd and reinstalled
- one
reason to do it would be to set up the partitions the way I want.
Also consider this, linux.com is a 100%-debian drive site - from the
impressions I've
gotten, the VA people are really big on Debian, but for the reasons above
aren't
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 01:20:03AM +0200, Mail Delivery System wrote:
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
Can we please block this guy?
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 07:53:07PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> gtkicq
replaced by gnomeicu
> communicator/netscape*45
new version is out(46)
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Systems Administrator
CICAT Networks - The New Brand of Telecommunications Service
Web: http://w
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 01:02:10PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Hmm... then why isn't it used on my system? devpts is mounted, I
> have /dev/ptmx, but /dev/pts is empty.
Perhaps you aren't using anything that uses unix98 ptys? Not everything
uses them by default, you know. Sometimes patches a
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 03:13:39AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > "Mitch" == Mitch Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mitch> GENERAL QUESTION: What is the procedure for getting a UID in
> Mitch> the 0-99 range added to Debian?
>
> Add a wishlist bug to 'base-passwd' I believe.
And pray.
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 10:17:59AM -0800, Adam Klein wrote:
> I need to make a new frozen release of wmakerconf, but my system is potato
> all the way. Does anyone have a computer I could compile this on?
Sure.
I just fresh reinstalled slink last night. Contact me privately for more
information.
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 08:06:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> It *was* a joke, you know.
It's hard to tell sometimes. :p
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 01:30:31AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:23:17PM -0500, Brian Almeida wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 11:57:39AM -0600, Ossama Othman wrote:
> > > If no one else will take your Imlib packages, I will. Let me know wh
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 07:41:45PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I'm very happy that you took the package, because I'm heavyly dependend
> from it. In my humble opinion maintaining is not so hard, because
> the program compiled well in all version I compiled myself (sometimes
> there where reasons
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:53:44PM -0500, Shaleh wrote:
> Raster and I had philosophical differences, which made the maintainer/author
> relationship hard. Give it a shot, if you can't do it someone else will step
> in.
Same reason here. Just took me a few months to really realize it =)
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 11:57:39AM -0600, Ossama Othman wrote:
> If no one else will take your Imlib packages, I will. Let me know what
> you think.
They're yours.
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 12:14:57PM -0600, Ossama Othman wrote:
> There are two imlib maintainers listed on the "People Behind Debian" web
> page, Brian and Shaleh. Is that right? :)
No. Shaleh was the maintainer before me.
x27;t scared off everyone =)
Thanks,
Brian
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://www.debian.org
PGP Key: 0x3A800C65
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 03:03:26PM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> and how the unfortunate of us who already have upgraded to 1.0.2 can
> downgrade,
> i see the 1.0.1 package nowhere ...
!find libpng2 hamm
bma: um, dists/hamm/hamm/binary-i386/libs/libpng2_1.0.0-0.1.deb
> what about latest gnome pac
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 07:17:03PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> rvplayer does not work under Linux 2.1, if that's what you're running.
Why not? I noticed today that it wasn't working...are there any fixes?
It'll suck when 2.2 comes out and rvplayer don't wrok...
Well, now that I'm back from my wonderful little break, has anything been
decided on libjpegg6b (libjpegg62?) It's gettin' kinda close to freeze, and I
was wondering if anything happenedno updates on them in slink
Any word from the maintainer? If not, maybe Steve could upload his fixed
ve
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 10:57:25AM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
> Let's do something compatible with Red Hat (unless there are good
> reasons not to). Synchronizing SONAMEs is one of the goals of the
> LSB. If we are going to switch to libjpeg62 - let's do so before the
> freeze.
Alright. Who wants to
s makes me edgy. Jim, Chris? Your opinions? Maybe we
should just leave it at 6a...even Chris admits that 6b has not been tested.
I don't want to break every Imlib dependent package totally a week and half
before the freeze
But all the other packages have to make it
there as well.
Thanks.
Brian
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org/~bma/
_ _ _
__| | ___| |__ (_) __ _ _ __
/ _` |/ _ \ '_ \| |/ _` | '_ \
/
The latest version is 0.1.5. Audiofile is released under the GPL.
I did not see it listed in dselect/slink as of a few minutes ago.
If there are no objections, I will package it.
Thanks.
Brian
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.or
ving directory `/home/balmeida/gdselect/gtk'
make: *** [all-subdirs] Error 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~/gdselect]: exit
Script done on Sun Oct 4 11:31:43 1998
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resident Technology Advisor for ARC/Stubbs
Phone: 4095
Pager: 315-9746
ven though I dont' really use GNOME per se, I think its' a GREAT
idea. :)
Keep in touch.
Brian
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org/~bma/
_ _ _
__| | ___| |__ (_) __ _ _ __
/
While I'm awaiting the phone call to receive maintainer status (possibly
tonight), I have put up a preliminary .deb of my package(eMusic). It can be
found at:
http://web.terminus.cicat.com/software/emusic_0.5-1_i386.deb
Any suggestions welcome. :)
Brian
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL P
Hello,
I'd like to take on eMusic as a package once more. I've finally managed
to find the time to do it. If there are no objections, of course. :)
Brian
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://web.terminus.cicat.com
PGP Key: pub 1024/3A800C65 1998/04/20
>=1.2) and fnlib. Both imlib and fnlib are
already packaged for Debian, and are both GPL free.
Regards,
Brian Almeida
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://terminus.cicat.com
PGP Key: pub 1024/3A800C65 1998/04/20 Brian M. Almeida <[EMAIL PR
47 matches
Mail list logo
