Ben Armstrong wrote:
> This property of metapackages has always irked me. If I install
> gnome and then remove gnome-games, I won't automatically benefit in
> the next release from any other goodies the gnome maintainers have
> added to "gnome" package.
Amen brother.
Why aren't metapackages usi
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 04:12 pm, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> For example, a new set of virus definitions, we are told, may include
> a new library and a new strategy for catching viruses. Makes sense
> to me. But when you add that, are you just going to add in the
> latest upstream versio
Eduard Bloch wrote:
> It is allowing _few_ users to work around a dependency
> which makes sence for everybody else, but is not really useful for
> _those_ few users in their special environment.
What few users?
What special environment?
Can anyone provide a real world example of a
ack and reproduce it. Any clean install
would have the problem though, I guess.
(BTW, at what point should we trim To: and Cc:? If I had sent this to
just the bug database and debian-devel would that have been enough to
have it propogate to the right people?)
--
Brian Kimball
e.
You seem like a smart guy, so I can only assume you were being
dishonest, and not just incompetent. Combine that with your
selfishness, your arrogance, and your excessive, unnecessary, and
juvenile obscenity, and here's what you get:
*plonk*
--
Brian Kimball
lic Licence. Read this licence carefully before using,
> distributing or modifying this program. Included with this
> distribution is the QPL licence, a copy is also available at
> www.troll.no
--
Brian Kimball
6 matches
Mail list logo
