On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 01:12:43PM -0800, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> I recall there's a tool that builds small .deb packages that Provides
> some dependency, without doing any actualy work. What package is this
> tool in? Try as I might, I haven't been able to find it.
equivs
Frank
>
> Thanks,
> Sha
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:24:15PM -0500, Chasecreek Systemhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:13:10 +, Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 'postgresql-dev'.
> >
> > What's the name of the software you're trying to build?
> >
> > > I'm creating/documenting a quick Debian_Hints
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:30:24PM -0200, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> It's VERY oppressive to force hot-babe out of
> Debian because of personal feelings about nudity.
> It's pure anti-speech insanity leading the way
> to socialism.
How is this related to socialism at all ?
Frank
--
"Debu
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:48:06PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Then how do you suggest maintaining a kernel 2.4.20 for one
> > architecture and a 2.4.22 for another architecture, when you can't even
> > test on either of them?
>
> I wouldn't. I'm going to track the latest minor version, just
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:21:18PM +1000, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> At 9:13 pm, Friday, July 11 2003, Craig Sanders mumbled:
> > you're all making a big mistake. those numbers were obviously binary, not
> > decimal.
> >
> 2 architectures? Rght.
Little endian and big endian. Or CISC and
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 11:44:12AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:44:06PM -0400, James Michael Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> > > > > 100 million users
> > > > > 1000 installations
> > > >
> > > > I would recommend to exchange these last two lines. More installation
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 09:04:55AM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:04:54 -0500
> Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And not only 80386 needs this - There is the Sparc64 port which would
> > also benefit from this (http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/#64bit). If we
> > ha
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 10:15:54AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
>
> I could use some non-mac m68k boxes to do exactly that :-)
>
Does that include boxes that are not supported by the kernel yet ? I
have a VME 68030 board with full hardware documentation here...
Frank
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 07:26:34PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> I disagree. Once I've explained why I don't like HTML e-mail, people
> normally see 'my side' and switch.
And if they still don't see it, the following 'html' might convince
them, at least if they use outlook (be careful. It is not h
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 01:02:15PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> in an editor is not bloat? By the way emacs21 takes 50MB to install (vim
> takes 15MB), and yes a full KDE install takes more at around 254MB to
> install but it could be argued it provides more functionality. ;)
Are you sure ? Emacs
10 matches
Mail list logo
