Re: /boot partition too small

Hello, El jue., 6 oct. 2022 12:03, gregor herrmann escribió: > On Thu, 06 Oct 2022 11:48:42 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > > > ## /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf > > > > # makes somewhat smaller initrd files and buys some time > > COMPRESS=zstd > > > > # makes definitely smaller ini

Re: Bug#827555: ITP: circle -- Show byte statistics as an ascii circle graph

Hello, El sáb., 18 jun. 2016 21:12, Roberto S. Galende escribió: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: "Roberto S. Galende" > > Package name: bytes-circle > Version : 2.2-2 > > Upstream Author : "Roberto S. Galende" > URL : > https://circulosmeos.wordpr

Re: Bug#790933: ITP: drive - Google Drive tool

Sorry ... My phone ... Grrgh .. El dom., 5 de julio de 2015 23:14, Javier Barroso escribió: > El dom., 5 de julio de 2015 22:47, Tomas Pospisek > escribió: > >> Am 05.07.2015 um 09:15 schrieb Jackson Doak: >> > It might be possible to rename the binary and symlink &

Re: Bug#790933: ITP: drive - Google Drive tool

El dom., 5 de julio de 2015 22:47, Tomas Pospisek escribió: > Am 05.07.2015 um 09:15 schrieb Jackson Doak: > > It might be possible to rename the binary and symlink "drive" to it, > > which would allow you to give the binary name over easier > > > Top-posting in a thread breaks the flow of the me

Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)

It would be useful to know it : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766283 Regards El 08/11/2014 18:07, "Osamu Aoki" escribió: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:56:49PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > The release team is pleased to announce that Debian 8.0 "Jessie" is > fro

Re: contrib and nonfree distribs

Hello, El 28/02/2014 11:36, "Solal Rastier" escribió: > > Why the "nonfree" and "contrib" distributions aren't removed? The reply was given at this thread. There are people that think like you (if you think that should be removed). See gnewsense [1], maybe you prefer that distro than Debian. Reg

Re: init.d script not using !/bin/sh

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > [Thomas Goirand] >> If possible, I'd like to make a survey of what kind of interpreter >> packages are using for /etc/init.d scripts. How can I do that? Note >> that this would make OpenRC maintainer's life more easy, and avoid >> ugly

Bug#703946: general: OS freezes, but mouse and ping keeps working

Hello, On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Felipe wrote: > Package: general > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > Hi everyone. > > When using Google Chrome (I cannot assure you that it only occours with > it), more often surfing on Google+, the system freezes, but the mou

Re: Processed (with 66 errors): Please change me email address

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Javier Barroso wrote: >> When I want to change submitter address, I will want to change all >> submitter references, not only from not-archived bugs (imagine >> somebody which found this bug '

Re: Processed (with 66 errors): Please change me email address

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Javier Barroso wrote: > >> > 4. Send email with unarchive / submitter / archive instructions (same >> > search but with archive=archived) (checking the number of bugs to >> > change) &g

Re: Processed (with 66 errors): Please change me email address

Hi, On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Javier Barroso wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >> >>> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: >>> >&

Re: Processed (with 66 errors): Please change me email address

Hi, On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > >> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: >> >> > submitter 341249 javibarr...@gmail.com >> Failed to set submitter on 341249: Not altering archived bugs; see unarchive

Re: What about including less in standard installation ?

Hi, On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 13:12:14 +0200, Javier Barroso wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm forwarding here my ask in ask.debian.net [1], because two dd said >> to me about. >> >> I don't known i

What about including less in standard installation ?

Hi, I'm forwarding here my ask in ask.debian.net [1], because two dd said to me about. I don't known if less is not good for any reason, or having more is enough, but I always install less in my systems Thank you! [1] http://ask.debian.net/questions/why-less-is-not-in-standard-debian-installat

Re: Removing the manpage requirement for GUI programs?

2010/2/27 Josselin Mouette : > Hi, > > currently policy §12.1 mandates that “each program, utility, and > function should have an associated manual page”. However, the more I > stomp on bug reports about manual pages, the less I am convinced of > their usefulness for GUI programs. > > GUI applicati