Re: Second call for votes for the upload package rules GR

k/S3Tdc4ao2VKXa6PWeFMShevgUXVkO1hKO3nd2snJdaR2LXrp5KNRZKTyhx/zNR > vWV42wWITwQYEQIADwUCRekJcAIbDAUJABuvgAAKCRDRoe1yEWdqyHn/AKCTyOfA > gRDNzMPrXMbghkXb0+b2PwCgoHV+ffJw3tpdRcYrFYqAhLRME34= > =UvBX > -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > > > > arch-tag: 1c14135a-7b23-45f7-b0d5-78e68b24d4f8 > > -- > I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. Plato > Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://vote.debian.org/> > > 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debconf or not debconf : Conclusion

> > compatibility reasons ? uploading a new stunnel3 package will not > > resolve the problem. > > Epoch it and upload stunnel4 as a new package. Thanks, I will upload a stunnel4 package and a stunnel with Epoch tomorrow. Best Regards. -- Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue

Re: Debconf or not debconf : Conclusion

sion 4 on stunnel package. What is the correct way to reintroduce stunnel for compatibility reasons ? uploading a new stunnel3 package will not resolve the problem. Best Regards. -- Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue

Re: Debconf or not debconf : Conclusion

Hi On Thursday 03 July 2003 19:37, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Julien LEMOINE wrote: > > Secondly, to reply to every person who thinks I should have created a > > more "user friendly" migration who did not break backwards compatibility. > > My answer is that I ha

Re: Debconf or not debconf : Conclusion

On Thursday 03 July 2003 21:36, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:17:50PM +0200, Julien LEMOINE wrote: > > First of all, I present my excuses for having started a new debate > > about debconf in debian-devel. > > > > Secondly, to reply to every

Re: Debconf or not debconf : Conclusion

On Thursday 03 July 2003 22:49, Joey Hess wrote: > Julien LEMOINE wrote: > > Finally, since there is not really a policy about when to use debconf > > It's a pity you ignore the express wishes of the author, and the consensus > on this list as to their use. I ignore nothing

Debconf or not debconf : Conclusion

/default/stunnel is provided and you need to set ENABLED=1 to allow stunnel to be started from init.d * To set up stunnel for server use, read the /usr/share/doc/stunnel/README.Debian file. -- Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue

Re: Debconf or not debconf

Hello, On Tuesday 01 July 2003 22:51, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Julien LEMOINE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that > > complained about the fact that I didn't warning about the new > > /etc/default/st

Debconf or not debconf

d for this use, what is the best solution ? Inform users with debconf or give them informations only in changelog and README.Debian ? Best Regards. -- Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue

S390 and libXinerama

../../../../lib/libxosd.so: undefined reference to `XineramaQueryExtension' Any idea are welcome. Best Regards [1] http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=osdclock&ver=0.5-7&arch=s390&stamp=1056302808&file=log&as=raw -- Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue

Re: stunnel

Hello, I created a new package for stunnel 4, it is available at : http://people.debian.org/~speedblue/stunnel/ I will wait a little before take over the package. Best Regards. -- Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue pgpNIXSuf9fJZ.pgp Description: PGP signature

stunnel

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> three weeks ago without answer). Best Regards. -- Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue

Re: Looking for a builder/uploader to fix RC bug on gcompris

OTECTED], upstream source already in sid. > > I someone could please build and upload it quickly, it will be great - > otherwise I'll do that monday, but every day counts for woody... I built and uploaded it. -- Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue pgpsedbcuxwqa.pgp Description: PGP signature