Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, Lukas Geyer wrote:
>
> > As an
> > aside, I don't quite understand why Fortran is still so popular in the
> > numerical mathematics community... :)
>
> There still are a lot of Fortran libraries which
alberto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Intel has a powerful f90 compiler, the only one freely available on
> the market, as far as I know, which runs under Linux. It is an
> extremely important tool for those who run numerical simulations for
> scientific purposes.
> http://www.intel.com/software/p
"Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> it was probably proven that oxygen was
> better thatn flogiston (I don't really know what both are)
He, this would be a great signature... (Luca, oxygen is the quite
essential stuff you breathe, constitutes about 20% of the air around
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> apt-get source kernel-image-* doesn't bring me the real source. Instead, if
> I want the real source I must be root and install a binary package. Do you
> deny that this is confusing?
I don't understand why you must be root, could you elaborate? I am no
Peter Busser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I volunteered to make a package for exec-shield because it meets
> > the Debian criteria, I have time to do it, and it interests me.
> > PaX would take much more time so I can't do it.
>
> You cannot do it or you don't want to do it? In fact, anyone ca
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:11:15AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > hjkl is extremely newbie-unfriendly.
>
> And? Come on, this is *nethack*. It's the hardest game I know of, bar
> none. You have to learn a pile of keystroke commands when you first
> sta
Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I intend to hijack the gnugo package, and to ask for removal of the
> gnugo-dv package. Both packages were updated last time around 18 months
> ago, there are outstanding bug reports, none with a maintainer's comment,
> and I'd like to get the new upstr
"Steve C. Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 08:09:00AM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> > Right, that reminds me of a default option which I always change,
> > namely pickup_types. I don't know what the default is at the moment
> >
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's trivial to reconfigure it in nethack's option screen, just like any
> other option. I'm not sure why this one should be special.
>
> IMO, leave it at the upstream default; you'll surprise nethack players
> coming from non-Debian systems less that wa
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bad analogy. Consider the way that the Harry Potter books have been
> modified for the limited vocabulary of the American audience.
Ha, the Australians want American kids to read sentences like "Fred
and I managed to keep our peckers up somehow." (In t
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bdale> ... I announced a group subscription to lwn.net for Debian
> Bdale> developers, sponsored by HP...
>
> Debian may be seen as supporting non-disclosure conditions /
> protected proprietary information / trade secrets / etc. whatever.
What are you
Hi all,
I was looking for old posts, because I was sure that this must have
been discussed before, but I could not find any.
When a package removal is requested, there is a bug filed against
ftp.debian.org. Following procedures, the maintainer should also know
about it (either filing it himself o
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >wavtools (#155263), orphaned 342 days ago
> > Description: WAV play, record, and compression
>
> Just like sox! Not really...
Well, wavtools is a pile of crap, as detailed by Daniel Kobras in
#97589. I just filed for its removal.
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, how does one find the rest of the packages on one's system that
> "Conflicts:" with genuine GNU alternative packages.
>
> From the tone of your message, I bet there are lots that you fellows
> have pre-chosen for us new debian users. So far I have d
Millis Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've already spoken to the upstream author, and he does not see
> mwilling to convert to a DFSG license. Probably the only thing I can
> do is to make it suitable for the non-free section for the time
> being. Can you indicate to me how the license shoud
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I really enjoy reading a well-written changelog (and I'm subscribed to
> d-d-changes so I tend to read them all), so I'm interested in improving
> the quality of ones that aren't quite up-to-par. If there's a consensus
> that it's futile or pointless eff
"Matt Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately your choice is rather weak and doesn't back up your
> argument so I feel obliged to continue the thread a bit further
> (plus its giving my brain some exercise).
>
> [Oh yeah, the quotes are from some developer who's name I've
> promised not
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You'll note that ReiserFS anticipated the GNU GPL V3 by including
> > clauses that forbid removal of credits in its license, and for a long
> > time I have been telling Stallman that he needs to get V3 of t
Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 11:58:38 +1100
> Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was referring to your own post to my "DAM approval wait time"
> > outburst. Before this email, I had made some attempt at contributing
> > to the discussion with two posts in t
Hi,
after unsuccessful attempts to contact the maintainer of gnuchess, Martin
Mitchell (he did not answer at all to my emails), I would like to propose
a change to the packaging of gnuchess. Andreas Tille did at least do an
NMU to update to version 5.03 which fixes several outstanding bugs. One
re
20 matches
Mail list logo
