Millis Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've already spoken to the upstream author, and he does not see > mwilling to convert to a DFSG license. Probably the only thing I can > do is to make it suitable for the non-free section for the time > being. Can you indicate to me how the license shoudl be changed to > be suitable for the non-free section?
I am not for abandoning the non-free section, but I think we should really limit it to software for which no free replacement exists. I am not really sure that "email" satisfies this criterion. Maintaining non-free packages is a hassle, it might be easier to write a free replacement in the time saved by messing around with non-free packages and getting special Debian redistribution permissions. (Remember, there is no build daemon for non-free.) Lukas
