On Thu, 02 Dec 2004, Charles Fry wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > > > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > > > operates?
> > >
> > > glastree prov
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
> Here's an idea I just had about apt-proxy/apt-cacher NG. Maybe this
> could be interesting, maybe it's just crap. Your call.
rapt proxy is an actuall http proxy that caches debian packages. It's
written in ruby and since all you have to do to use it
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:32:19AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 05:52:39AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > > Package: na
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > I think the idea of a namespace for usernames used by packages is a good
> > idea, but rather than "debian-", we should take this to the LSB folk, so
> > that we can get it done once.
>
> The prob
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sks
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : "Yaron M. Minsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/sks/
* License : GPL (parts are LGPL, BSD)
Description : Synchronizing OpenPGP Key Server
SKS is an
On Thu, 06 Nov 2003, John Belmonte wrote:
> However in your package, assuming it is compiling GPL'd modules and
> including them in the library, is producing an object file governed by
> the terms of the GPL. Therefore your license field should read only "GPL".
Last time I checked we didn't ha
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Russell" == Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Russell> Do we have a library in Debian that provides reliable
> Russell> stream based communication over UDP?
>
>
> librx from openafs provides this functionality; it may be somew
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Michael Furr wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 05:03, Roland Mas wrote:
> > - Another idea I had was something along the lines of Debsmith or
> > Iansmith, to keep both the idea of Debian and the idea of the forge.
> > Unfortunately, plenty of people are called that way. Any
On Wed, 04 Sep 2002, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Ofcourse, it could just do system("mkdir -p /var/cache/whatever/dir/it/is")
> everytime it wants to open a file but that would be inefficient.
If it has the permissions to do so. Not everything runs as root and can
create directories belowe /va
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 10:05:10AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 07:06:47AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > In a couple of days uncompressed Packages files for unstable will cease
> > > to be generated, and bzip2'ed Packa
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Rodrigo Henriquez wrote:
> I don't know if this is the place to send this mail, so
> sorry if i'm wrong.
>
>
> I like contribute in some of the following projects :
>
> emelfm (#158150), orphaned 119 days ago
> Description: file manager for X/gtk
>
> gadfly (#113080),
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 0
> Number of packages offered up for adoption this week: 0
> Total number of orphaned packages: 0
> Number of packages orphaned this week: 0
Maybe you could run the script on satie rather than auric
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Package: debbugs
It would be bugs.debian.org. You don't file a bug against smartlist or
qmail if you want a new mailinglist either. Please reassign.
> What to do?
>
> I would like to propose a setup similar to the one used to translate
> package de
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 17:20]:
> > http://qa.debian.org/developer/
>
> If you want to have it hosted there, you should really
> a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards
>for web pages (i.e. hav
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Igor Genibel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
> following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
> Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
> packages such as:
> - the
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Below's a list of the bug tahtw will be renamed. The "filed" and
> "changed" fields in the list are the number of days that have past since
> the bug was opened, and since any addition was made to the report,
> respectively.
> #85612 mixmaster
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Then there's some ITP's i (enthousiastically) did; i'm going to be closing
> them too. Interested people can upload and close at will, if they're faster
> than me: ricochet, loop-aes, cryptoapi, ipsec-tunnel.
Please retitle them to RFP (request
Hi,
I intended to ask for removal of this list but Joey sugested to ask
first whether anybody intents to use this list or finds it useful as it
is now.
In my -release folder I found:
| Total messages since November 2001: 128
| (some spam has been fltered out by SA locally, I won't dig them out)
|
taller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 03:47:07 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rejected: no signature found in uucp_1.06.1+1.07beta1-patch2-2_powerpc.changes.
Rejected: no valid distribution.
Rejected: no source found f
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
> (irrelevant side note: do you need to enter your old passphrase before
> changing
> it?)
The Passphrase actually encrypts your key, so you of course need to
supply it to change or reencrypt the key with a different passphrase.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 26, Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Are there any problems I missed with cimply copying the files?
> Yes: people do not want to restart bind at every configuration changes.
good point.
> >Mount
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
> On Sep/26/2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> > > I think that maybe he refers to the fact that, for example, you may
> > > have formatted your ext2 partitions so they are incompatible with 2.0.x
> > Well, I once heared about this, but never read an
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > and would instead suggestion to modify the documents stating that all
> > > config files should be in /etc to make a exception for $CHROOT.
>
> >
> > NEVER. This is not some low-grade distribution where you can go around
> > scattering configurati
Hi Matt!
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Deborphan is nearly perfect for this. Right now, it just keeps track of
> > whether a package was installed to satisfy a dependancy, or because you
> > really want it. If instead of the y/n question it uses for this, it
> > asked _why_ you
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Ironically, it won't prevent the problem that sparked this thread,
> namely a weird build environment on the machine where the NMU is
> compiled.
I would still love to see Source Only uploads becoming the standard
way of getting new versions into the
Hi Ivan!
On Sat, 06 Jan 2001, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 03:46:54PM +0100, Michael Meding wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > as of three days ago, every attempt to do a dist-upgrade tries to uninstall
> > almost every kde package. What is wrong there.
> >
> > Maybe the package m
Hi Gordon!
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
> XML::Simple is a Perl module that facilitates reading and writing Perl
> data structures to XML. It is especially useful for configuration
> files.
>
> It's licensed under the same terms as Perl.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -S XML/Simple
Hi Pawel!
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Pawel Wiecek wrote:
> On Jan 4, 1:11pm, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > (see a thread here on -devel perhaps a
> > month or two ago).
>
> I can't find it in the archive...
http://lists.debian.org/debia
Hi Pawel!
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Pawel Wiecek wrote:
> How long does it take usually for a (GPG) key sent to keyring.debian.org
> to show up in official keyring (and maintainers database)?
> I'm waiting for my new GPG key to show up for quite a few weeks and it seems a
> bit excessive to me :^)
Ne
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I'd sooner killfile you than respect a lame Mail-Followup-To like this:
So you
o expect people to honor your Mail-Followup-To header, yet
o ignore mine on purpose.
Yes, please killfile me so I don't have to deal with your replies.
> The problem
Hi Branden!
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:35:26PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> >
> > > From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Mail-Followup-To: debi
Hi!
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
ARGL, /me should really get glasses or whatever.
Any reason you ignored my MailFup2 header?
yours,
Hi Branden!
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 10:57:35PM -0800, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > I suspect most people's MUA's don't display non-standard headers by default
>
> But there is also this, which *is* standard[1], and which I also have:
>
> Mail-Copies-
Hi Eray!
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sending this mail because libc maintainer seems to have closed
> the bug I've issued without doing any investigation on his own.
| It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
| Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
|
| T
Hi Guenter!
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Guenter Bechly wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 03:50:52PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > FWIF I'ld really like to see removal of packages beeing announced to
> > debian-devel-changes and debian-changes repectivly.
Hi Josip!
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 03:40:41PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > Again there is a pointer from packages.debian.org, but the deb is not
> > > in the directory pointed to.
> >
> > Seems like packages.debia
Hi Guenter,
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Dr. Guenter Bechly wrote:
> I suggest that the intent to
> remove a package should always be filed as a bug to this package or even
> better as a bug to wnpp-peudopackage, so that the information can be
> traced with rea
Hi Oliver!
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >> There is a further weird package disappearance in unstable: all mgetty
> >> packages (execept mgetty-doc) are gone!
> >
>
Hi Tinguaro!
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Tinguaro Barreno Delgado wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I maintain a rsync mirror of potato and woody (i386) and this week the
> distribution has lost +50 packages. They aren't in ftp.debian.org (I'm
> rsyncing from ftp.de.debian.org). Can anyone explain this?
Have
Hi GBechly!
SCHREI NICHT SO!
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am very sorry for the loud subject of my mail (I know it is bad
> netiquette), but since I got no satisfying answer on my first mail
> concerning "disappeared packages" and because the issue is important
> I decided t
Hi,
some while ago you where talking about packaging Interbase for
Debian. Who is it doing now and if at all, how is it going?
yours,
peter
[please respect the Mail-Followup-To header!]
--
PGP signed and encrypted m
Hi Nils!
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> Why is the woody Package file not updated when Files enter the Package pool?
> Or is there still another Package file that I need to use? The only Pool
> files that had mad it into the Package file are libc6 and spong.
woody is not unstable:
Hi Guenter!
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Dr. Guenter Bechly wrote:
> Should I file this as a bug, or could be something wrong with my Perl
> installation?
This issue has been filed about 10 time (really!) and is resolved in -2
which is currently in incoming (yes, wiggy uploaded a new -2).
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Olaf!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > I have made a couple of packages for potato and would like
> > to update them to the latest upstream-version? What is the
> > easiest way to update the source-package?
>
> Use uupdate. This is descriped in the new-maint
Hi Tomasz!
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Tomasz Barszczak wrote:
> Package: general
> Version: N/A; reported 2000-12-24
> Severity: wishlist
>
> This is only a test, should not be sent to debian.
Didn't work, it went to Debian all way through.
Merry Xmas!
yours,
Hi Stephen!
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Piotr" == Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piotr> ITO: libapache-asp-perl
> Piotr> ITO: libapache-filter-perl
> Piotr> ITO: libapache-ssi-perl
> Piotr> ITO: libcgi-pm-perl
> Piotr> ITO: libdbd-csv-pe
Hi Miros/law!
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Miros/law `Jubal' Baran wrote:
> 12.09.2000 pisze Torsten Landschoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Don't change that. Beginners would be very confused if the keytable
> > is not working as expected. Not everybody can work with a US keyboard
> > table if the need a
Hi Ethan!
On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 01:25:09AM -0400, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > >
> > > my home directory is mode 710 and ssh works fine, on other systems my
> > > home is mode 755 and ssh still works fine (all with RSA auth and
> > > StrictModes yes)
> >
Hi Bernhard!
On Sat, 02 Sep 2000, Bernhard Josef Rieder wrote:
> Package: penguin-command
>
> Section: non-free/games
>
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depe
Hi Roland!
On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 06:21:51PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > 751 seems more reasonable IMO.
>
> This sounds also reasonable for me. And because of the x-bit UserDirs,
> etc. should work. Does anyone objects if I change this with
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi, I ITP Class::MethodMaker which is a module for creating generic
methods.
It is needed by GnuPG::Interface.
Upstream source can be found at http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Class/
Author: (Original) Peter Seibel (Organic Online)
Current Maintainer
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi, I ITP GnuPG::Interface, a Perl interface to GnuPG.
It is distributed under the GPL. Upstream sources are at
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/GnuPG/
Upstream Author is Frank J. Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll contact him wheter including GnuPG::Interface is
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Decklin Foster wrote:
> Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: general
> > Version: N/A
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > There are too many boot messages, and they sometimes scroll too
> > fast. It would be nice to log all the output from the boot scri
Hi Josip!
On Sat, 01 Apr 2000, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 02:19:24PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > [new lists created]
> > >
> > > On related note, why not have new-maintainer lists on our listserver,
> > > too?
> >
> >
Hi Josip!
On Sat, 01 Apr 2000, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 12:17:26AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> [new lists created]
>
> On related note, why not have new-maintainer lists on our listserver,
> too?
Isn't this what debian-mentors is for?
you
Hi Santiago!
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Bruce Perens wrote:
>
> > Permissions on mount points don't seem to make much difference. I was able
> > to
> > mount a filesystem on a mount point with mode 0, and once mounted the
> > permissions come from the mount
201 - 256 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
