On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 05:35:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 04:11:49PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Fedora has moved to having /var/lock (now /run/lock) owned by
> > root:lock 0775 rather than root:root 01777. This has the advantage
> > of maki
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 06:03:59PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 04:11:49PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Fedora has moved to having /var/lock (now /run/lock) owned by
> > root:lock 0775 rather than root:root 01777. This has th
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 07:36:26PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 06:00:50PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 05:35:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 04:11:49PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > Ar
e this obviously isn't an overriding
consideration it is a nice easy way to browse the documentation. Can
same be done for any other compression formats?
Roger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7e7rh8-j14@silverstone.rilynn.me.uk
rposes of
>
> Don't we have epochs for this? I know they are annoying and should
> be avoided, but they are still a blessing compared to the current
> confused versioning scheme.
Hopefully we'll have 0.7 in unstable soon(ish), and this will just
be a temporary issu
mory for that couldn't be shared by either
1) having it as a file on disc that all processes can open and map in
2) forking and inheriting the parent's data
3) using POSIX SHM
?
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://peop
d when computing the set of
packages to install.
Alternatives in regular package Depends are delegated to
apt-get/aptitude, and what is installed will depend upon what is
available and installable. For packages being build for main, the
contrib and non-free archives should not be ava
th functions-having-two-names that it used to use.
> >
> > With either solution, if you want to LD_PRELOAD (as for GLib's refdbg tool)
> > you have to have a second copy of GLib compiled to not do that, like
> > libglib2.0-refdbg in Debian.
>
> Unbuntu use B
h is updated almost every
> time a removable media is connected to the system. Or
> /etc/mtab. Or /etc/lvm/cache/.
These should all be moved to /run. mtab will be moved shortly.
The LVM and block ID caches should also move there, with backups
put under /var as required.
Rega
th in ISPs and elsewhere) will usually allow unauthenticated
connections from machines connected to their networks. Only if they
allow users to send mail from elsewhere will they require SMTP AUTH.
Roger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
liberately exclude "other" non-approved
applications, the result being that every menu system in Debian is
crippled in one way or another. We don't have a single menu system
that actually does a complete job (i.e. does not miss out needed
entries), which is a great pity.
Regards
" and "for users",
consider that if it's for users to invoke then it should simply be
in the default path. It's not typical to need to add special
directories to one's path, and it's certainly not encouraged or
recommended.
Regards,
Roger
--
.
is a good place for executables called
by programs rather than by users. I'd like to be able to make
use of it.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://
y
how free it is nowadays.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
t defaults--you are free to configure your system
to satisfy your needs as you see fit.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
, for the various tmpfses including /tmp, when
generating the initial /etc/fstab. I lack the d-i knowledge to
add support for tmpfs though.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing o
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:29:14PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Roger Leigh
>
> Hi,
>
> somewhat of a tangent, so sorry for hijacking the thread:
>
> | Currently, the size limits for /tmp and other temporary filesystems
> | are set in /etc/default/tmpfs.
>
ou haven't
specified any size limits, therefore you'll use the initscripts
defaults should you have RAMTMP=yes or a readonly rootfs.
The 50% limit is not used by initscripts, where a lower 20% limit is
used. This is so that the combined total of all the tmpfs filesystems
does not exceed
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:09:16PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Roger Leigh
>
> | I may have given an incomplete picture here. While we set the defaults
> | there, any entry in /etc/fstab will override those defaults.
>
> Can you please not set the default in a file i
since it's always going to be in the page cache
(modulo swapping), which means you can just mmap it and it's right
there in memory and you don't have duplicate copies on disc and in
your working set, and in the buffer cache.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :'
o 20% core for /tmp.
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:56:40AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Roger Leigh writes:
>
> > As touched on in the bug report, I think that being able to store
> > 1.2GiB on /tmp is an unrealistic expectation. To qualify, I mean
> > to expect that to work *by default
changes would typically only affect the Debian packaging and
not require upstreaming, but even if they did per-distribution
branches would still be the way to go.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `'
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:08:39AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Roger Leigh [2011-11-29 10:04]:
>
> (...)
> > > > > - Conditional application of patches. Some packages have patches
> > > > > that are
> > > > > only applied
There was an issue with
-indep in #648901. It's fixed in 8.9.10; you might also need
to explicitly enable v9 compat mode. That bug shouldn't
affect -B though since it's calling the -arch targets directly.
Your use of dh --before/--after may have confused things
though.
Regards,
Ro
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 05:17:47PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Thank you, Roger, for your extended response.
>
> > What is preventing you from building the docs in build-indep?
> I am trying it to do it now, using new -indep and -arch options.
>
> > Are you using the
ager, this makes no sense--
the content of /usr is intimately tied to the content of /etc.
In other contexts it might be useful, but for Debian it is not.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `&
ful for any feedback.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
--
To
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:08:10PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:54:14PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > If you have a few minutes to spare, some testing of the packages
> > would be appreciated, so make sure there are no corner cases we've
&g
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:32:40PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:08:10PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:54:14PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > If you have a few minutes to spare, some testing of the packages
> > &g
x27;s an continuing migration of "essential" packages to the
rootfs. Given that a modern initramfs can mount pretty much any
filesystem, either locally or over a network, what's the *real*
reason for a separate /usr? It's certainly not for any booting-
related reason.
Regard
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:08:10PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:54:14PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > If you have a few minutes to spare, some testing of the packages
> > would be appreciated, so make sure there are no corner cases we've
&g
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:31:41PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Two clarifications:
>
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> >> The question that needs answering is this:
> >>
> >> "what are the reasons, today, for a separate
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:43:38PM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> [..]
> >The same argument applies to encryption. / and /usr both contain a
> >selection of programs, libraries etc. If you're encrypting one, why
>
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:57:20PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 15, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > That is to say, /usr is a split of /convenience/. The real solution
> > would be to have /etc as a separately-mounted encrypted filesystem.
> > So really, keeping
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:17:53PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:29:18PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Well, I think I still need persuading that this is the right direction
> > to move the files. I still think that moving /usr to / is a better
> >
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:35:17PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Le 13/12/2011 22:32, Roger Leigh a écrit :
> >On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:08:10PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> >>On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:54:14PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >>>If you have a few
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:35:55AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 01:24 AM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Hi Riku,
> >
> > I think an important point to consider is that /usr would not
> > disappear. It could be replaced by a symlink for new installs.
> >
into conffiles in fstab.d.
It would then be possible for the installer to edit these files
quite simply to change the defaults, perhaps using the partitioner
as a frontend.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 06:19:54PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 15, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > > You keep repeating arguments in favour of moving /{bin,sbin,lib}/ to
> > > /usr/ :-)
> > Well, I think I still need persuading that this is the right direct
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:29:18PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> WRT mounting additional filesystems in the initramfs, how difficult
> would it be to add an additional mount option to /etc/fstab entries,
> e.g. "init" or "initramfs" to mark them as being required fo
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:54:14PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> The above have been mentioned a few times during the course of the
> year, but we're now at the point where all the prerequisites have
> been satisfied, and there are no blockers present to proceed.
>
> I'
t annoying. It should
be perfectly capable of pruning its own cache rather than
pointlessly filling up /var with thousands of downloaded
packages. I'm surprised it doesn't automatically remove
outdated .debs when you update, and require special configuration
not to do that.
Regards,
R
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 03:37:43AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 17, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > So WRT mounting /usr (and potentially /etc and other filesystems),
> > I've pushed patches upstream for util-linux (initramfs mount option)
> > and initramfs-to
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:11:39AM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> [..]
> >
> >Regarding the objections above, which are primarily concerned with the
> >creation of a non-generic initramfs, how does this alternative sug
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 01:17:41PM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:11:39AM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> >>On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >>
> >>[..]
> >>>
>
olume (two if including /var), which would enable
~instantaneous checkpointing/rollback during upgrades. User data in
a separate subvolume would thus never be rolled back. I've not checked
it recently, but support for subvolumes in the d-i partitioner would be
a nice feature for w
ources are known to git, and 'git clean' is a reliable and simple
solution to the problem. The alternative, manually reverting all
the changes, is both complex and error-prone. I'm not sure I see the
problem with what is an obvious improvement to the process.
Regards,
Roger
--
.
do
need retiring (I'm not saying this is true for the above, yet) when
there are obviously better ways of accomplishing the same thing.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on
If you really need to use a filesystem mounted noexec, just run
the binary via /lib/ld.so (you'll need to get the real location
from e.g. ldd). Something like:
LD=$(ldd /tmp/path/to/screen | grep "ld-${arch}" | sed -e
's/[[:space:]]*\(\/[^[:space:]]*\)[[:space:]].*/\1/
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 04:04:04PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> [/tmp mounted noexec]
> > > /run/shm (IIRC formerly /dev/shm) likely would be an
> > > alternative option, too.
> >
> > No, it would not. This directory is
ctory#Packages_using_.2BAC8-dev.2BAC8.udev
Regards,
Roger
dd-list output:
Richard Atterer
udftools
Gonéri Le Bouder
fusioninventory-agent
Fathi Boudra
kvpnc (U)
Pierre Chifflier
ocsinventory-agent
Russell Coker
refpolicy
Debian ALSA Maintainers
alsa-driver
Debian In
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 05:08:13PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > There are 19 packages still using /dev/.udev after udev transitioned
> > to /run/udev. Unless there are any objections, I'd like to raise the
> > severity of these bugs fro
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 05:01:54PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 13.01.2012 03:18, Roger Leigh wrote:
> []
> > All are currently broken. Whether they cause severe breakage depends
> > upon the individual case. Some are working apparently OK, e.g.
> > mdadm. Others
bc, busybox or initramfs-tools as appropriate.
Thanks,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG
es much more robust. Not having
to hard code per-arch package lists and being able to handle it
just like we currently handle build-essential would, IMO, be a
Good Thing.
If it were to use the same file format that build-essential uses,
we would be able to reuse that.
Regards,
Roger
--
.&#x
one can work out which
logical volume each represent by looking at the symlinks.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GP
? Interested to know the result.
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +3 Sofia
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
append
"UMASK=0077" to /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
[1] https://cryptsetup-team.pages.debian.net/cryptsetup/encrypted-boot.html
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Shimizu
* Package name: golang-github-xtaci-tcpraw
Version : 1.2.25-1
Upstream Author : xtaci
* URL : https://github.com/xtaci/tcpraw
* License : ExpatExpatExpatExpat
Programming Lang: Go
Description
with
DNS servers of any kind.
It apparently already does, although they appear to be used only under
certain circumstances. See https://bugs.debian.org/761658
Roger
you need more help, I think you should share your ~/.gbp.conf and
~/.pbuilderrc
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
ion downloads from Google Play plus more
from F-Droid).
Roger
PS I had forgotten that one does have to be registered with the news to
mailing list gateway in order to post through it.
akes sense, if the latter,
application/.
It is usually easy to save a text file from a web browser, while it is hard
(impossible?) to persuade it to display an unknown application/* type. Thus,
even if your latter example is more common, it may be preferable use text/.
Roger
ne in the config file for how to return to the previous
format. For "normal" users, I think this change makes it harder to read and
makes the lines longer for very little benefit.
Thanks,
Roger
devtools-frontend/src/node_modules/minify-html-literals/src/minifyHTMLLiterals.ts:297:13)\n
at Object.transform
(/build/chromium-97.0.4692.99/third_party/devtools-frontend/src/node_modules/rollup-plugin-minify-html-template-literals/dist/index.js:15:47)\n
at Promise.resolve.then
(/build/chromium-97.0.4692.99/third_party/devtools-frontend/src/node_modules/rollup/dist/shared/rollup.js:20218:25)\n\n'
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 2:12 AM Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> On 2/11/22 06:18, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> > Dear Andres,
> >
> > Thanks for your work for chromium!
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 7:33 PM Andres Salomon wrote:
> >>>> I saw
>
rmel and run them for
diagnostic purposes on embedded boards which only have Busybox installed and
for which I don't have a convenient build environment.
Regards,
Roger
PS Apologies if I've followed up incorrectly - I read debian-devel through
an NNTP gateway. - And I screwed up the reply so Simon and the bug got a
different copy.
cing, the absolute population of those i386 users is growing (I
> guess the former is the larger contributing factor, but it's hard to
> determine from the numbers only).
The popcon graphs clearly show that the absolute number (not proportion) of
i386 reports flattened off in 2008 at about 65000, when AMD64 became
popular. The number of i386 reports has been falling since 2014, and is now
about 1, most of which are from old releases (oldstable or older). It
seems likely that the number of i386 reports from stable will be overtaken
by ARM64 during the period of Bookworm.
Roger
On 15/01/2024 18:00, Russ Allbery wrote:
> When you have the case of an application that optionally wants to do foo,
> a shared library that acts as a client, and a daemon that does foo, there
> are three options:
>
> 1. Always install the shared library and daemon even though it's an
>optiona
NEW queue.
If 3rd party keyring is feasible, I wonder why we don't have the deb
multimedia [1] keyring [2] in archive.
And emdebian's keyring [3] didn't hit archive, either.
[1] https://www.deb-multimedia.org
[2]
https://www.deb-multimedia.org/dists/sid/main/binary-amd64/packa
ake sense to compress changelogs with xz? For src:linux,
> this achieves about a 20-25% reduction over gzip.
If there's not much difference when uncompressing xz, I guess it's
good idea to switch to xz for Buster.
Thanks for your idea!
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
e.php?p=fxlinuxprint
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
ot; the same as "cgit".
[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/01/threads.html#00309
Originally, "cgit" is for web browser to see, and "git" is for "git
clone" or "git remote add" to checkout the source tree.
Rewrite rules of web server makes them equivalent.
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Dear Adrian,
Thanks for your detailed backgroud info!
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:37 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> Hi Roger!
>
> On 01/19/2017 06:27 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> My package src:fxlinuxprint [0] didn't start to build for 1+ month.
>> While othe
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:33 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 01/22/2017 04:31 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> Hope things will improve soon.
>
> Thanks. We're working hard on it :).
Thanks for your effort on porting stuff!
>> However, I still cannot understand
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Shimizu
* Package name: golang-github-xtaci-smux
Version : 1.0.4+git20170112+ds-1
Upstream Author : Daniel Fu
* URL : https://github.com/xtaci/smux
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Shimizu
* Package name: golang-github-xtaci-kcp
Version : 2.14+git20170120+ds-1
Upstream Author : Daniel Fu
* URL : https://github.com/xtaci/kcp-go
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : A
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Shimizu
* Package name: kcptun
Version : 0.0~git20170126.0.203a626-1
Upstream Author : Daniel Fu
* URL : https://github.com/xtaci/kcptun
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : A Simple UDP
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> I'll collect some further wishes and graphs will be available in beginning
> of March.
Thanks for your effort!
I just didn't find printing team and pkg-go team.
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
ssumed more stable than the RTC.
This doesn't make sense to me. Most users are probably not aware that there
is a separate hardware RTC. Why would one assume that the clock the user is
not aware of is better than the clock the user can see and is presumably
happy with?
Roger
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Shimizu
* Package name: libbloom
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Jyri J. Virkki
* URL : https://github.com/jvirkki/libbloom
* License : BSD-2-Clause
Programming Lang: C
Description : simple and small bloom
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Shimizu
* Package name: simple-obfs
Version : 0.0.3
Upstream Author : Max Lv
* URL : https://github.com/shadowsocks/simple-obfs
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : simple obfusacting
"apt-get -o
Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes --no-install-recommends"
(from wiki [0])
[0] https://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/Review
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
pgpqcHPZtCqZQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
rg/HowToCrossBuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage
Hope it helps you.
And if you find something not current and need modify, please just edit it.
Thank you!
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:29 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 11:43:58PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>>
>> I ever created one:
>> - https://wiki.debian.org/HowToCrossBuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage
>>
>> Hope it helps you.
>> And if
th0"
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTR{address}=="1c:1b:0d:9a:34:9a", NAME="eth1"
Roger
On 13/07/17 12:40, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 05:17:57AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Roger Lynn wrote:
> > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ATTR{address}=="1c:1b:0d:9a:34:98", NAME="eth0"
> >
> > I
Dear Jonathan,
How is your build? Does it go well?
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 23:43 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>>
>> I ever created one:
>> - https://wiki.debian.org/HowToCrossBuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage
>>
&
bian.org/HowToCrossBuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage
Now I confirm it builds only image and header 2 debs when targeting
"UNRELEASED".
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
t; or equivalent for
your distribution/arch to your schroot configuration, which will make it
select the appropriate distribution when you use "-d unstable".
Regards,
Roger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Shimizu
* Package name: smali
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : Ben Gruver
* URL : https://github.com/JesusFreke/smali/wiki
* License : BSD-3-clause and Apache
Programming Lang: Java
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Wesson
* Package name: neat
Version : 1.8
Upstream Author : Roger Wesson
* URL : http://www.nebulousresearch.org/codes/neat
* License : GPL v3
Programming Lang: fortran 95
Description : Nebular Empirical
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Wesson
* Package name: alfa
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Roger Wesson
* URL : http://www.nebulousresearch.org/codes/alfa
* License : GPL v3
Programming Lang: fortran 95
Description : Automated Line
I want to report a bug regarding to {anonscm,git}.debian.org, but I
don't find a pseudo package to file bugreport to, so I contacted
ad...@alioth.debian.org, but no reply yet for nearly 1 month.
I hope maybe someone here can help. Thank you!
Cheers,
Roger
-- Forwarded me
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jan 2016, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/kernel/linux.git
> All those urls work for cloning.
>
> So what exactly is your problem?
Thanks for your response!
In browser, you see an https l
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 3:29 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jan 2016, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> > On Sat, 09 Jan 2016, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> In browser, you see an https link, click it then you get an empt
ate?
I agree redirection is even better.
But since robots.txt of the git site disallow everything, it might be
not much different.
Cheers,
Roger
eplace it with https://
>
> Please ignore my suggestion, I just now learnt from Ben's mail that both
> cgit and git can be used for Vcs-* field :-)
actually, it should be "cgit".
"git" was originally for git smart transport only, and recently alioth
team changed to let you see the "cgit" page for better user experience
[0].
[0]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/01/msg00333.html
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 17B3ACB1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roger Shimizu
* Package name: golang-h12-socks
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Hǎi-Liàng "Hal" Wáng
* URL : https://github.com/h12w/socks
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Description
701 - 800 of 835 matches
Mail list logo
