Hi there ...
The different frontends (apt, dpkg, aptitude, ...) behave different in
consideration of installing 'recommends'.
The decision which packages should be 'suggested' and which should
be 'recommended' depends on what frontend is supposed as 'standard'.
What is beeing considered as
Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a
version number like: 1.0.8~rc1
Am Donnerstag, 22. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:37:16 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 3/13/07
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Gunnar Wolf:
Please set up the headers accordingly in your mail client :)
What's wrong with my headers?
Lg
Roman
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Gunnar Wolf:
Roman Müllenschläder dijo [Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:43:56PM +0100]:
So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor
the one in stable?
Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running
Edgy
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Roman Müllenschläder:
Hi there ...
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a version
number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
Reason is the following: I have this packages on my repository for making
it available to users for testing puposes. I
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
The problem is that the mentioned lintian warning was fixed in .27 .. so
if testing and unstable are using .28, there should be no problem with
just ignoring the warnings for now and see what my _tests_
Hi there ...
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a version
number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
Reason is the following: I have this packages on my repository for making it
available to users for testing puposes. I know that the initial release
should be 1.0.8-1. So if I
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Margarita Manterola:
On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a
version number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
If you use that number, the upstream version should be 1.0.8~rc1
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
[Roman Müllenschläder]
So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor the
one in stable?
Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running Edgy ;)
I know I'm stating the obvious here ... but you
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Margarita Manterola:
On 3/13/07, sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 20:23 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
If you use that number, the upstream version should be 1.0.8~rc1. Is
that the upstream number? If you want to have
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb The Fungi:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
[...]
Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running
Edgy ;)
[...]
If you're developing packages for Debian, not Ubuntu, I would
suggest at a minimum
Hi there ...
I've got a little problem ;)
In my debian package there usualy are 4 debs (3 flavours + common) been built.
I've created the rules to be to choose between a minimum of 2
(standard-flavour + common) and the maximum of 4 packages.
If a user wants to compile the package on his own
Am Donnerstag, 8. März 2007 schrieb Roman Müllenschläder:
Hi there ...
I've got a little problem ;)
Sorry .. will never user reply for a new message anymore ;)
Lg
Roman
14 matches
Mail list logo
