-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On 1/15/06, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Completely agreed. While I don't object to occasional mails from
>>Ubuntu users, I don't generally have a proper Ubuntu contact (or list)
>>to point them to. This would he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Meskes wrote:
>>other field should reflect that. But again, some people are offended if
>>the maintainer field is changed to something ubuntu specific for the
>>modified packages. As before it's not an easy task, you get burnt if you
>>go eithe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> It's also about false statements like "We sync our packages to Debian
> regularly," because that simply doesn't happen for quite a lot of us,
> otherwise all these heated discussions wouldn't happen.
They have their own timeta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:20:40PM +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
>>I read the part about sarcasm and i partially argee with you. But i'm
>>with Andreas here. Your post didn't help anyone, the o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> If you can't understand sarcasm, why didn't you read the part for
> people who can't understand sarcasm?
I read the part about sarcasm and i partially argee with you. But i'm
with Andreas here. Your post didn't help anyone, th
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> The problem is that the decisions are always taken for the Ubuntu
> distribution first. Then, people from Canonical or people wanting to
> keep compatibility between the two distributions will always want
> Debian to follow the decisions taken for Ubuntu, regardless of t
Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Does apt-get have a command to upgrade all the dependencies of a
> package? Currently I use 'apt-cache show package' and upgrade each of
> the dependencies one by one, but it seems to me this is a job for
> apt-get if ever there was one. If this requires a new command, perhap
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: libgetopt-argvfile-perl
Version : 1.06
Upstream Author : Jochen Stenzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Getopt-ArgvFile/
License : Artistic
Description : simple supplement to option
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 09:33:05PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Sami Haahtinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > "lex" is the better word, as it is not only known in English, but also
> > > in most other (roman) Languages for law.
> >
> > Oh righ
h law. This is the first time
i've even heard the definition for 'lex', i support naming it
debian-law, so that it's clear for the non-lawyers too.
Regards, Sami
-- Law should serve the people, thus people should understand the law.
--
-< Sami Haa
ration for each boot media and make it spit out a
customized compatibility list for that image.
There is no such service (not that i'm aware of) but it would be great
to have around.
Regards, Sami
--
-< Sami Haahtinen >-
-[ Notify immediately if
why not
> > package it..
>
> Regardless, newer versions of Mozilla Calendar don't need it. :)
Hmm.. which library do they use then? i know they still use iCal
files...
oh well..
Sami
--
-< Sami Haahtinen >-
-[ Notify immediately if you do no
ooks promising and hope someone packages it.
In the past the only thing that stopped me from doing a build of my own
from the sources was that debian missed libical.. and now that there
appears to be libical-dev, i can't see any reason why not package it..
Sami
--
y supported are db and anon) and all the migration
scripts are yet to be written..
also the db fileformat is now (since alpha 2) dependant of libdb4.1
which is yet to be packaged..
This is just a heads up and all.
Sami
--
-< Sami Haahtinen >-
-[ Notify imme
.
Regards, Sami
--
-< Sami Haahtinen >-
-[ Is it still a bug, if we have learned to live with it? ]-
-< 2209 3C53 D0FB 041C F7B1 F908 A9B6 F730 B83D 761C >-
pgpgvd5OqSyAs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
be easily disabled (with update-inetd or something) or
removed. This is one of the most powerful features of Debian, why would we want
to ruin that?
--
-< Sami Haahtinen >-
-< 2209 3C53 D0FB 041C F7B1 F908 A9B6 F730 B83D 761C >-
pgp0kZN9Lqfen.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:46:35AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> > how about diffs bethween dinstall runs?..
>
> sorry, but i don't understand here. dinstall is a server side thing here?
yes, when dinstall runs it would copy the old packages file to, lets say,
packages.old and create it's changes to th
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:05:03AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Whats the problem with a big Packages file?
>
> If you don't want to download it again and again just because of small
> changes I have a better solution for you:
>
> rsync
>
> apt-get update could rsync all Packages files (yes,
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:07:00PM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
>
> The only other possibility not yet proposed (?) would be to split the
> packages file by section.
>
> base-packages
> games-packages
> x11-packages
> net-packages
>
> Then a server that just doesn't do x11 or doesn't go games h
he
package file, if the file gets corrupted, it would attempt to do a full update.
This wouldn't be a big difference in the load that the master-ftp has to
handle, atleast when some 7 of these would be stored at maximum.
Regards, Sami Haahtinen
--
every nerd knows how to enjoy the little things of life,
like: rm -rf windows
20 matches
Mail list logo
