Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libpoe-filter-ircd-perl
Version : 1.2-1
Upstream Author : Jonathan Steinert, now Chris Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://search.cpan.org/~bingos/POE-Filter-IRCD-1.2/
* License : GPL/Artistic
Descripti
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:04:36 +0200, Adeodato Simó uttered
> There's known trouble with this check linda producing false positives.
> Just upload if no binary of yours DT_NEEDs libstdc++5.
>
Is there really? This is the first I've heard of it, keeping in mind
I'm ignoring #179926.
Please file
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 12:06:48 -0500, Joe Wreschnig uttered
> No, it doesn't return UTF-8, it returns unicode objects. They're
> automatically recoded when you try to print them (based on the same
> function lgettext uses, locale.getpreferredencoding()). As Steve said,
> unicode objects are basically
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400, Joey Hess uttered
>xringd
Fixed package in unstable as of a few days ago.
Cheers,
--
Steve
C offers you enough rope to hang yourself.
C++ offers a fully equipped firing squad, a last cigarette and
a blindfold.
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 10:24:50 +0200, Martin v. Löwis uttered
> It is also useless for the issues at hand: since linda and
> apt-listchanges apparently use local strings, giving them Unicode
> strings would break them. So Junichi's change looks right to me.
>
Standing up for Linda, I am more than wi
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 20:40:09 -0400, Glenn Maynard uttered
> Peter's complaint is a legitimate and important one--it really is a terrible
> package name--so please don't dismiss it. Package names are a shared
> namespace, and must be chosen intelligently.
>
I concur. When I built this program loca
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 09:45:04 +0200, Emanuele Rocca uttered
> Everybody agrees here, but (AFAIK) this is not the situation we are
> discussing. No 'Better Ideas' in linda.
>
Speak for yourself. Here are three (off the top of my head) that
spring to mind that lintian can't do, and I feel better serv
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:54:01 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen uttered
> TTBOMK, he hasn't discussed this with the dpkg maintainer, nor has he
> made his code public.
>
Er, Adam Heath has made plenty of uploads of dpkg, and is listed as an
Uploader.
Cheers,
--
Steve
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:19:31 +0100, Thiemo Seufer uttered
> AFAIR it wasn't fixed but dropped, nobody seemed to care about
> sun4c any more.
>
You need to check your assertions better. Joshua Kwan has done a hell
of a lot of work with sparc{32,64} recently. Anyway, sun4c is not the
only sparc32 su
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 06:21:26 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis uttered
> I suspect this has to do with
> http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/Release.gpg being an
> empty file. Stable still has a signature; what happaned?
>
If I remember the conversation on IRC correctly, the archive GPG key
exp
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:17:10PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I found Python to be a very nice, elegant language. I have not yet
> used it for any real project, but I am looking forward to give it a
> spin.
>
Agreed. I used Linda as an excuse to learn Python, and it helped me _really_
understand
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:00:37AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> Do we want to talk about keyring?
>
I'm glad you want to. I lost my GPG key a few days ago due to a RAID
disaster, and got Herbert Xu to send a message to keyring-maint on my
behalf (as outlined in the Replacing Ke
At 10:05 pm, Tuesday, October 14 2003, Magos?nyi ?rp?d mumbled:
> Which road will you take to make linda fall into testing?
> Wait until python2.3 provides python (>= 2.3), or change
> the dependencies of linda?
>
I'm going to wait. Like I usually do.
> Anyway I feel it is a pity that the almost-
At 6:46 pm, Tuesday, October 14 2003, Magos?nyi ?rp?d mumbled:
> Linda apparently does not know about the new policy version.
> It isn't even reported as a bug (filing it right now).
>
It does! Stop spreading lies, Linda 0.2.21 deals with Policy 3.6.1
correctly, but does not drop to testing immed
At 9:13 pm, Friday, July 11 2003, Craig Sanders mumbled:
> you're all making a big mistake. those numbers were obviously binary, not
> decimal.
>
2 architectures? Rght.
--
Steve
advice to insomniacs: autoconf macro references can be coma-
At 7:57 am, Monday, June 2 2003, Herbert Xu mumbled:
> So what? The *Debian* changelog is for Debian changes only. It's not there
> for listing upstream changes, copyright information, or who your favourite
> TV personality is.
>
And if this new upstream release deals with a bug filed in the BT
At 10:27 pm, Friday, May 23 2003, Wouter Verhelst mumbled:
> Is there any chance of these changes being merged into the debbugs
> package? It's last update is over a year old...
>
debbugs_2.4_all.deb 18-Nov-2002 22:0280k
Not quite. Well, that's experimental, but whatever.
--
At 8:31 am, Tuesday, April 22 2003, Bastiaan Naber mumbled:
> I have updated my unstable box but my address auto completion does not work
> anymore in mozilla. Can anyone reproduce this ? It is annoying me as hell.
>
Ditto. I did the annoying switch to mozilla-snapshot where completion works,
At 7:22 pm, Saturday, April 19 2003, Denis Barbier mumbled:
> I do not understand exactly what is good and bad use of debconf.
> For instance all questions asked by the debconf package have good default
> values, so there is no reason to prompt user, a configuration file is
> enough. So what am I
At 11:06 am, Sunday, August 25 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh mumbled:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> > Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were
> > previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency
> > on:
> >
> > libdi
At 7:01 pm, Wednesday, August 21 2002, Anthony Towns mumbled:
> linda doesn't run cleanly over the entire archive -- it misbehaves on
> some packages (leaving /tmp/linda-* directories about), and just seems
> to hang on others. I haven't tracked down what's causing this. I don't
> believe it inclu
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-24
Severity: wishlist
Package name: libevent-perl
Version : 0.86
Upstream Author : Joshua Nathaniel Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/J/JP/JPRIT
License : Same as Perl its
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 01:21:05AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> sledge:~/debian/evolution$ du -s usr/*
> 3660usr/bin
> 6656usr/lib
> 12 usr/sbin
> 14548 usr/share
>
> Over half of the installed package is made up of stuff in /usr/share,
> i.e. common arch-independent stuff like im
At 10:30 am, Saturday, January 12 2002, Rob Bradford mumbled:
> I'm now a happy evolution user, to converyt my mail i did cat
> Mail/lists/* | cat /var/spool/mail/rob
>
Congratulations, you get today's "Most Useless Use Of cat" award. Plague,
and LART will be forthcoming.
--
At 11:17 am, Friday, January 11 2002, Adam Heath mumbled:
> That's a bug in python2.{1,2} then. What's the point of having a platform
> neutral 'compiled' version of a script if the format changes every time the
> wind changes direction?
>
FUD. Pure FUD.
--
At 2:08 pm, Tuesday, January 1 2002, Tollef Fog Heen mumbled:
> | It then un'tar's the base tarball into /target, makes Linux bootable if you
> | said it could, and then reboots.
>
> There is no base tarball for woody; it then runs debootstraps which
> unpacks the .debs.
>
Okay, I should add th
At 1:53 am, Tuesday, January 1 2002, Penguin mumbled:
> How does it work? Broad overview: does it install a root filesystem and
> simply do a huge cp /mnt/cdrom/package /wherever then configure, or what?
>
As I understand it, when you partition a drive, it mounts the too-be root
partition as /t
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-09-25
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libacme-poe-knee-perl
Version : 1.02
Upstream Author : Jos Boumans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://japh.nu/index.cgi?base=modules
* License : Perl Artistic License
Descripti
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 11:09:54PM +0200, Massimo Dal Zotto uttered:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to get the full URL of a package (the one which is passed
> by apt-get to dpkg for package installation) from apt-cache or some other
> standard tool? What I would lite to do is something like this:
>
[E
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:27:20AM -0400, Joey Hess uttered:
> It'd be nice if someone would look at optimizing it sometime; the
> behavior I see with strace is absurd, and could easily be done with no
> syscalls, at least, by just reading the whole trustdb into memory.
>
I doubt very strongly that
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:53:03PM +0200, Paul Slootman uttered:
> Would it be possible to also offer a compressed version of these files
> (update_excuses.html, update_output.txt, etc)? Most browsers can handle
> uncompressing these on the fly and it makes accessing these lists MUCH
> faster. As a
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Francis ANDRE uttered:
> I check out the www.gnu.org inetutils against debian inetutils and I found
> them out of sync??
>
Found _what_ about them out of sync? Their version number? Their 3rd toe on
their root foot? _What?_
> Could anybody tell me why??
>
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 07:03:41PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa uttered:
> >
> > call ``madison package'' on auric.
>
> It needs a shell access. I don't always have shell access to auric.
>
Use packages.debian.org search page, that'll tell you what is installed.
(Yes, it's somewhat like madison.)
--
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 08:49:17PM -0700, Stephen Zander uttered:
> I'm trying to track down why some of my packages have not made into
> testing. update_excuses shows one of them as out of date on hppa, but
> doesn't give a buildd log showing why. Do hppa buildd logs exist
> online anywhere?
>
34 matches
Mail list logo
