> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:55:39 -0600
> From: Richard Laager
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: using epoch to repair versioning of byacc package
>
> On 1/23/22 10:04, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > In #1003769, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > 1. The u
In #1003769, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> 1. The upload introduces an epoch because the upstream version went from
> mmdd to 2.0.mmdd. Given that the new version scheme seems to
> have found acceptance in e.g. Fedora /I/ do not see a better way. Could
> you ask about the epoch on debian-devel (
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008 ? 17:29 -0400, Thomas Dickey a ?crit :
agree - I don't know how to guarantee that five years from now there'd
be no ABI change - the best I can do is maintain API compatibility.
You can maintain ABI compat
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 13:40:14 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
from the upstream POV, this would be another ABI transition.
If there's no patch, there's no
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Thomas Dickey:
Then in that case, it should be possible for someone to submit a patch
which does that.
Yes, but ...
I don't recall anyone mentioning it recently (other than this thread,
for example). The ABI=6 code's been there a
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Dan Kegel wrote:
[+dickey]
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So the obvious solution seems to me then to build ncurses twice,
providing both libncurses5 and libncurses6 packages. What point do I miss?
The crashes that will happen
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John> The software uses CDK (ncurses) to handle the user
> John> interface, libxml2 to store the information, the zlib
> John> library to compress the data and the library GpgMe to
> Jo
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 03:52:18 -0400
> Source: lynx
> Binary: lynx
> Architecture: source amd64
> Version: 2.8.6-2
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: high
> Main
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 04:51:45PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Thomas Dickey:
>
> > It's a #define. But the change to use the home directory is in the
> > wrong place. I'd point out that it doesn't solve the problem, and
> > that the program is stil
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 02:15:42PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061130 14:12]:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > > I didn't know PERSONAL_MAILCAP was run-time configurable (it looks
> > > a #
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> I didn't know PERSONAL_MAILCAP was run-time configurable (it looks
> a #define to me). If apt-get source wasn't segfaulting at the moment I'd
It's a #define. But the change to use the home directory is in the
wrong place. I'd point
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:47:26PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 06:41:21AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > > Changes:
> > > lynx (2.8.5-2sarge2.2) unstable; urgency=low
> > > .
> > >* Non-maintainer upload.
> > &g
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 10:00:40AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:43:17 +0100
> Source: lynx
> Binary: lynx
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 2.8.5-2sarge2.2
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Ma
Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:15:43AM -0000, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>>>> Martin Schulze has been told more than once that this was not an OpenBSD
>>>> patch.
>>> Could you please tell me why this is such a h
Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:15:43AM -0000, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>>>> Martin Schulze has been told more than once that this was not an OpenBSD
>>>> patch.
>>> Could you please tell me why this is such a h
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>This is the third time this year that patch has been incorrectly
>>ascribed to OpenBSD.
> Sorry for the misundertanding. I'll fix the lynx changelog file.
> I just used the patch from 2.8.5-2sarge2 in stable-security.
ok. Perhaps you should r
Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:26:09AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> Martin Schulze has been told more than once that this was not an OpenBSD
>> patch.
>>
>> After the second time, there is no plausible excuse.
>&
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He can fix a previous entry and cite it in next version.
Perhaps 4 months is too short a time for him to correct it.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Dickey wrote:
>>> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:40 +0200
> [...]
>> After the second time, there is no plausible excuse.
>> Do you have an excuse?
> Why do you ask if you know there isn't?
> Hint: You
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:46:56PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:40 +0200
> [...]
> > After the second time, there is no plausible excuse.
> > Do you have an excuse?
>
> Why do you ask if you know there isn
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:41:49 +1000
> Source: lynx
> Binary: lynx
> Architecture: source i386 sparc amd64
> Version: 2.8.5-2sarge1.2
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: high
> Maintainer:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 08:20:14AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:40 +0200
> Source: lynx
> Binary: lynx
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 2.8.5-2sarge2
> Distribution: stable-security
> Urgency: hi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>* There was no time to upload 2.8.6dev19 because 2.8.6pre2 was released
> so soon.
Thanks - I put out pre.1 on Thursday since I anticipated not having time
yesterday to work on it, but decided that the feedback from pre.1 was
doable for Sunday.
Benjamin Mesing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I can't see any mention of xterm in packagesearch's changelog, nor any bugs
>> filed about the problem, either.
> Look at changelog.gz, probably I should have copied it to
> changelog.Debian.gz too. Bugs were not filed against this problem. And
> to be
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 10:10:08AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 10:10:08AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 09:23:11 +0200
> Source: lynx
> Binary: lynx
> Architecture: source powerpc
> Version: 2.8.5-2sarge1
> Distribution: stable-security
> Urgency:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:28:38 +1100
> Source: vile
> Binary: xvile vile-filters vile vile-common
> Architecture: all i386 powerpc source sparc
> Version: 9.4-r1
thanks. For 9.5, the s
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The procedure would be to upload a new 'xterm' package which moves
>> > /usr/bin/xterm to /usr/bin/xterm.real and introduces /usr/bin/xterm
> Of course, you mean /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm...
I didn't notice that. Though the cygwin people have been m
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> martin f krafft wrote:
>> What do you think of this proposal. Are there any string points
>> *against* it?
> I have written scripts that explicitly call xterm because other terminal
> emulator programs under X (which I had preferred otherwise) couldn'
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> As a happy use of rxvt-unicode-ml (thanks Zomb!), I am very annoyed
> at times by softwares that have 'xterm'
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 06:43:09PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>> The procedure would be to upload a new '
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 05:43:16PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Thomas Dickey [Fri, Oct 08 2004, 10:17:11AM]:
> > Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe it would help if you gave me the name of a sane terminfo entry that
>
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Maybe it would help if you gave me the name of a sane terminfo entry that
>> has an "italic/oblique" display command.
> He's not able to because the feature
Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Primitive? heh. And as for the rest, I haven't had trouble -- it's just an
> infocmp away. In any case, switching the emulation is trivial -- it's not
> like terminal emulation is complicated.
Judging by the variety of poor implementations, I'd say that
Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe it would help if you gave me the name of a sane terminfo entry that
> has an "italic/oblique" display command.
He's not able to because the feature does not exist in terminfo.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-islan
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #include
> * Jeff Teunissen [Thu, Oct 07 2004, 02:20:31AM]:
>> > If we are going to allow generic names, then obviously they would be
>> > applied to the most commonly used or "best for the novice" example, so
>> > I'm pretty sure that GNUstep apps aren't
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 20:04:54 +1100
> Source: vile
> Binary: xvile vile-filters vile vile-common
> Architecture: all i386 powerpc source sparc
> Version: 9.4-c1
> Distribution: unstable
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:29:15 +1000
> Source: vile
> Binary: xvile vile-filters vile vile-common
> Architecture: source sparc all
> Version: 9.3-s1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 16:25:53 +0900
> Source: lynx-cur
> Binary: lynx-cur-wrapper lynx-cur
> Architecture: source i386 all
> Version: 2.8.5-11
I'll probably have 2.8.5dev.16 done on this weekend.
> Di
39 matches
Mail list logo
