Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 16 novembre 2009 à 13:55 +0100, Harald Braumann a écrit :
>>> Just because it is a tradition doesn’t mean it’s the correct way.
>> So far I haven't seen any argument as to why it shouldn't be the correct
>> way.
>
> It’s broken because:
> * there are race
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 06:14:34PM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
>> If the documentation is something designed to be viewed in a web browser
>> and the user has broadband, it is arguably easier to find it on the web.
>> Even knowing preci
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:58:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery was
> heard to say:
>>> I think that lintian warning is the right way to do it.
>> I don't -- I think there are too many false positives for a lintian
>> warning given the thread. I also think this is fundamentally go
>
One would think that even developers that haven't been elected/appointed
to certain positions don't get to do these things.
Travis Crump[not a debian developer]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ywhere unless I really need to since it
is really bad to lose it and doesn't fit in a wallet, not to mention my
passport photo isn't a very good likeness being 9 years old whereas my
license only last 4 years]?
Travis Crump[not a DD, nor have I been to a keysigning]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Nicolas François wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:03:37PM +, Simon Huggins wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:44:38PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>>> * Marc Haber [Thu, 05 Jan 2006 14:40:45 +0100]:
Experience with adduser shows that no-one besides the maintainers
themselves and t
Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi
>
> As you may or may not know, I'm currently working on packaging
> xulrunner, which is ought to be the central point for all future mozilla
> technology, meaning that at more or less long term, all mozilla products
> (firefox, thunderbird, etc.) will be built on top of it
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder, when latest wxwindows2.4 packages will be moved to testing.
> If I look at
>
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=wxwindows2.4
>
> it is a valid candidate and the dependency from libpng should be fine
> as well
>
> http://qa.debian.org/dev
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:48:14PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>> I've just uploaded aptitude 0.3.4 to experimental. This is basically a
>> release candidate for 0.4 -- if no nasty bugs crop up, it will be uploaded
>> as
>> 0.4 in unstable once the translators c
Should changelogs be in chronological order or should they be in version
number order? Specifically I just noticed that libtiff4's changelog is
out of chronological order[attached for reference]. It seems that the
maintainer was maintaining two branches: an experimental
branch[3.6.1-3->3.7.0-
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 19:53 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
paddy wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:28:14AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:02:02PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
5)==
User specific configuration files for applications are stored in the user's
hom
Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in adopting libical? It has been orphaned for
193 days (#187030). I wouldn't mind removing it, but mozilla
build-depends on it (perhaps this can be changed, tho?).
Mozilla builds fine without libical.
What does happen, then? Will it still be able to
Colin Watson wrote:
? I think that's a minimal specification for a correct installer package
which does its work by creating Debian packages; unless you think that
it's better for the installer package to spit out a .deb somewhere which
you then have to install separately, which seems to me like a
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-23 03:30]:
If someone missed a meeting because a program they installed out of
Debian had a time bomb in it, they would be justified in questioning
their use of Debian, not just the application.
No. They would be justified in que
Marcel Weber wrote:
Hans, I hope that the removal of these credits was a mistake and that
they're going to be included in future releases of testing. ReiserFS is
a really fine piece of software and anyone who helped with it's
development should have the right to be credited if he or she wants so
Thomas Hood wrote:
If a target release has been specified, then APT uses the
following algorithm to set the priorities of the instances
of a package. Assign:
priority 100
to the instance of a package that is already
installed (if any)
16 matches
Mail list logo
