On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 09:38 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> On 14.07.24 02:28, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > OK, don't beat me up too bad, even though I deserve it. I've been
> > away
> > a LONG time and did not retire properly nor update my key and my
> >
ou old timers
that I used to work with might be willing to sign my new key and/or
would be looking for possible keysigning in Philadelphia, PA area or
maybe even New Haven, CT area.
Thanks for any guidance/help!
Barry deFreese
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Barry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, m...@hazelmollusk.org
* Package name: vaticinator
Version : 0.0.4
Upstream Contact: Matt Barry
* URL : https://github.com/hazelmollusk/vaticinator
* License : MIT
On Sun, 2022-08-07 at 08:04 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Matt Barry writes:
>
> > I'm not really opposed to using asdf-vm if that prevents genuine
> > ambiguity. Are any of these packages a) packaged for Debian, b)
> > provide
> > a binary called 'asdf&#
On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 13:22 +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Ole Streicher writes:
>
> > The URL is asdf-vm.com
> >
> > Maybe this could be called "asdf-vm" according to the upstream
> > name?
> > "asdf" also refers to the Advanced Scientific Data Format,
> > https://github.com/asdf-form
On Mon, 2022-07-25 at 14:37 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 12:34:31PM -0400, Matt Barry wrote:
> > Anyway, its been released at this point, so the issue is moot :)
>
> Regardless of the rest of the discussion, this isn't entirely true.
> Yes, people
On Mon, 2022-07-25 at 09:33 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Philipp Kern writes:
> > On 25.07.22 08:46, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > >
> > > obviously false. "No change" is always less surprising than any
> > > change,
> > > whatever the rationale is.
> >
> > It can also be unsurprising from an end-user's p
Hello,
On Sun, 2022-07-24 at 15:09 +0100, RL wrote:
> Marc Haber writes:
>
> > ... Here is what the adduser team considers possible
> > documentation for this, and we itend to include this in NEWS.Debian
> > as a
> > rationale for the change.
>
> As a user who reads NEWS.Debian (via apt-listcha
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Barry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-pywayland
Version : 0.4.13
Upstream Author : Sean Vig
* URL : https://pywayland.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
* License : Apache
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Barry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-pywlroots
Version : 0.15.18
Upstream Author : Sean Vig
* URL : https://github.com/flacjacket/pywlroots
* License : UIUC (NCSA)
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Barry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: qtile
Version : 0.21.0
Upstream Author : Aldo Cortesi
* URL : https://www.qtile.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A
Hi,
On Thu, 2022-07-07 at 08:48 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > >
> > > Can you come up with a better default for users created with
> > > adduser
> > > --system without requesting a dedicated group?
> >
> > One idea worth considering, imho, is what the reporter [0]
> > suggests:
> > make --group t
Hi!
On Mon, 2022-07-04 at 09:12 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> adduser has been putting newly created 'dynamically allocated system
> users' (adduser --system) into the nogroup group. It is also
> documented to do so. There is an ancient bug report complaining about
> this, and I think this i
ve revived, lead by the Fedora
folks. Please do check out the new thread, especially if you have opinions
about what /usr/bin/python should do once Python 2.7 is EOL.
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/linux-sig/2017-August/thread.html
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
an all your great work on those packages.
Cheers,
-Barry
[1]
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
pgphTycGyB2fL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t
generally, I think the two are there to test different aspects or lifecycles
of the package.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpvpsvB8j6tg.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
useful information. It also includes a
retry button (the little three-arrow triangle) for people with the proper
permissions.
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpLCUAxhyn7m.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
corner of stuff I use, care about,
and know about is in as good a shape as possible before it gets into the hands
of our users. I *want* to feel the pain before they do.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpkRsW_JvKiI.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ecosystem until that happens. Of course,
we can and do also look to other Linux distros for data, fixes, and
collaboration.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgprdEJHxJXVB.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tch back if dput also had a dm subcommand (although truthfully, I rarely
use that anyway).
I think it's fairly confusing that there's dput and dput-ng and would love to
see functional and cli convergence so that eventually there's only one package
that supports current use cases.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-distro
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Nir Cohen
* URL : https://github.com/nir0s/distro
* License : ASLv2
Programming Lang: Python
ackage
>*and* there is a willing adopter, just give it up; or talk to the prospective
>adopter about some kind of collaboration, or something on that line.
And please strongly consider team maintenance where available.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgp0Ll3xLPIZw.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: flufl.testing
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Barry Warsaw
* URL : https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.testing
* License : ASLv2
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-webencodings
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Simon Sapin
* URL : https://github.com/gsnedders/python-webencodings
* License : BSD
On Jun 07, 2016, at 11:22 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>I have started a wiki page to compare gitolite and gitlab
>https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/GitNext
Another possible option is Pagure
https://pagure.io/
Written in Python and developed by Fedora.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpAFfrqLj5m8.pgp
Descr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-public
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Barry Warsaw
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/atpublic
* License : ASL2
Programming Lang
eflect the new upstream.
It's not at all clear to me how to (best) import a new upstream orig.tar.gz
for a new upstream version. It's difficult to be more simple than `gbp
import-orig --uscan` but that's the level I'd like to work at.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpABXkHPAiw5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
sed
to adding this path to the default search.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpC4WEh4S4IN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
5, I'm changing my mind on compatibility with Mailman 3.0.x
and Python 3.5. On IRC, PEB said he was going to look at what fails when
running the test suite against 3.5. If that's tractable, I'll make the
upstream release-3.0 branch compatible with Python 3.5.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgp1vsim
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-progress
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Giorgos Verigakis
* URL : https://github.com/verigak/progress/
* License : ISC
Programming
#x27;locale', '-a'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
>... stderr=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0]
>>>> type(rv)
>
For Python 3, try adding `universal_newlines=True` to any subprocess call.
You'll get back a str.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpnuq4igREKj.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: dirtbike
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Asheesh Laroia
* URL : https://github.com/paulproteus/dirtbike
* License : Expat/MIT
Programming
version number.
LGTM, and I think the mapping between tag name and semantics are obvious.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgp10KcEOvPYr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ailman 3.)
What about some of the other GitLab features though? Presumably we wouldn't
want issues to replace BTS. Also, how would we handle membership for things
like team-maintained packages?
Thanks Sytse for the generous offer.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpgCKkHk3SSL.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
mewhere (on his blog?) a script which could
>reconstruct a .pc, although I think with git-dpm you never actually
>need to use quilt, since you should instead be git-dpm checkout-patched
>+ git rebase.
Yep.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpxPGBvp68rn.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
commits back to debian/patches, but
again leaves you patches unapplied.
There's no current view where you have both patches applied *and* a debian/
directory.
(FWIW, bzr-builddeb actually does present you with exactly this view,
patches-applied-with-debian/)
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpdUR4cVw82y.pgp
D
On May 20, 2015, at 04:36 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>Does anybody else have comments / adjustments on the text above?
>I'd like to send out the bugs within the end of this week.
LGTM.
-Barry
pgpUHroOdhwCe.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-pluggy
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Holger Krekel
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pluggy
* License : MIT
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-cachecontrol
Version : 0.11.2
Upstream Author : Eric Larson
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/CacheControl
* License : MIT/Expat
On Apr 22, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>Seems to work fairly well, certainly it is robust enough to not have
>500 Internal Server Errors.
File a bug? :)
Cheers,
-Barry
pgp393q5a3UIo.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Apr 22, 2015, at 10:40 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>I don't like it due to the JavaScript requirement, many things just
>give 500 Internal Server Error unless you have JS turned on.
Can you navigate github without JS?
Cheers,
-Barry
pgp2Hk9JVhtjQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
r
some reasonable amount of testing it will land in production.
I'm quite looking forward to it, as I think the Launchpad bug tracker is
really nice. I love being able to create multiple bug tasks for a single bug
targeting multiple versions and projects.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpKZK1RmqAfa.pgp
On Apr 16, 2015, at 07:19 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
>> I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
>
>Why Gitlab when there's Kallithea? :)
Kallithea is under consideration as forge for upstream Python:
http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0462/
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpxAfgqu1BlU.pg
On Apr 18, 2015, at 02:56 PM, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>arch 7
>bzr199
>cvs11
>darcs 832
>git12439
>hg 65
>mtn23
>svn3593
I hope at some point soon after Jessie is released that the DPMT will
officially switch from svn to git.
Cheers,
-B
On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:04 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>I'd rather see gitlab.debian.net :)
+1
I've started moving my personal projects to gitlab and like it a lot.
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpEtXwHRd4zO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-future
Version : 0.14.3
Upstream Author : Ed Schofield
* URL : https://python-future.org/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Python
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-pex
Version : 0.8.6
Upstream Author : Brian Wickman
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pex
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang
On Dec 12, 2014, at 08:36 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
>Even for the source package name, “pathlib” is IMO too general. This is
>specifically a library for Python programmers only; its source package
>name should not grab a generic name like “pathlib”.
Why not first-come-first-served?
Cheer
was once a necessity (with CVS/SVN). Not so with git.
+1. On Ubuntu, we had sourceful branches with UDD (bzr-based Ubuntu
Distributed Development). It always seemed more awkward to use debian-only
branches in debian-python svn branches. Playing with sourceful e.g. git-dpm
is a joy.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e we recommend "upstream/latest" by default but allow "upstream"
>alone in the case when there are no other upstream branches tracked ?
+1
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
if you don't anticipate importing an other
upstream branches.
Again thanks. After Jessie is released, I hope to restart this discussion
over in Debian Python, for that team's transition to git.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Oct 29, 2014, at 01:47 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>I got the impression that sbuild is winning over pbuilder BICBW.
Especially now that bug #607228 has been fixed!
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Oct 22, 2014, at 03:02 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
>debsnap, in devscripts.
>gbp-import-dscs --debsnap, in git-buildpackage
I've also been working on this script (with help from tumbleweed) for
similarly importing history using debsnap into git-dpm:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/
On Sep 12, 2014, at 07:18 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>I'm looking forward for systemd-mta.
It's inevitable. ;)
http://catb.org/jargon/html/Z/Zawinskis-Law.html
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ano's summary of the DC14 conversations:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2014/08/msg00159.html
There are other threads in the archives, so please do read up on our
discussions to date, and come over to the debian-python list to give us your
suggestions and feedback.
Cheers,
-Barry
me, regardless of whether you used gbp, git-dpm, or plain vanilla
git + quilt. One example of a superficial differences is the tag names used
by default. They're different between the two helpers, but really needn't be.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: lazr.delegates
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : lazr-develop...@lists.launchpad.net
* URL : http://launchpad.net/lazr.delegates
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: lazr.config
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : lazr-develop...@lists.launchpad.net
* URL : http://launchpad.net/lazr.config
* License : LGPLv3
ndwaving
>etc. about this kind of thing there.
I'm hoping there will be discussions regarding vcs at Debconf (I will be
there), especially among the DPMT for planning on a transition from svn to
git.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: lazr.smtptest
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : lazr-us...@lists.launchpad.net
* URL : https://launchpad.net/lazr.smtptest
* License : LGPL
d sense to have that.
(I'm not arguing against using an upstream git tag when it *does* all work
nice and smoothly, just saying you can't count on it, and should force our
workflows onto upstreams'.)
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ou
do all your cutting edge development, and there isn't usually a clear
alternative naming scheme (e.g. code names). 'trunk' might be better anyway.
But in Debian's case, all packaging work is targeted to a series, so it makes
more sense to make that evident in the branch name
it makes me somewhat uncomfortable to assume that a git tag in the
upstream repo will always be equivalent to their released tarball. In fact,
it's often not, as is the case with Python packages containing a MANIFEST.in.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
git and Debian, but I think it
makes a lot of sense not to assume what 'master' might point to, but instead
be explicit about the series name in the branch name. If it's possible to
make a shorthand alias for the most common branch (unstable?) then that's fine
too.
Cheers
he two git-based package development regimes is
"better" or "more popular"?
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
dividual developer rather than of the "package"?
Especially for team maintained packages, if you and I are on a team, you might
not want it to apply patches but I might.
I suppose in those cases though, teams (or even co-maintainers) can establish
conventions, although it would be nice in that case to also have a
--no-skip-patches option.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-persistent
Version : 4.0.8
Upstream Author : Zope Foundation and Contributors
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/persistent/4.0.8
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: cov-core
Version : 1.12
Upstream Author : Marc Schlaich
* URL : https://github.com/schlamar/cov-core
* License : Expat/MIT
Programming Lang
existing MM2.1 installations in parallel with MM3, at least
for a while or while they're testing out the transition.
I may not have time in the immediate future to do the packaging myself, but I
will assist others in any way I can.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n easier, and I would be highly
motivated to help others adapt and extend MM3 for Debian's use.
Contact me personally off-list or via IRC, or start the discussion on the
mailman-develop...@python.org list.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
best REST library I've used is restish,
but unfortunately it doesn't have upstream Python 3 support yet. Other
libraries exist for doing REST but IMHO they're not as nice.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
tingToPy3k/BilingualQuickRef
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: wheel
Version : 0.23.0
Upstream Author : Daniel Holth
* URL : http://wheel.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
* License : Expat/MIT
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: nose2-cov
Version : 1.0a4
Upstream Author : Meme Dough
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/nose2-cov/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang
ferent
regime, or no CLA at all.
This may seem like a silly or moot point, but it actually shows the beautiful
thing about FLOSS. Projects only die because no one cares about them any
more.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: singledispatch
Version : 3.4.0.2
Upstream Author : Łukasz Langa
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/singledispatch
* License : Expat
the guts of
either editor in years.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nths, I see only marginal changes [1] but no real development.
I agree that XEmacs's time has come and gone.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
accurate about exactly the deal
that you agree to in order to contribute to upstart.
Cheers,
-Barry
[*] or have their employers make up their minds for them. ;)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nue "to own the
copyright in the contribution, with full rights to re-use, re-distribute, and
continue modifying the contributed code", but it allows Canonical to use your
contribution in certain ways. Read the above link and the linked FAQ for
details.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
uilt
interaction right, especially when doing merges. Another important lesson is
to be sure that when committing a branch (say for a merge proposal), you do it
at the same quilt push "level" as the original branch.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Block
* Package name: pyper
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Barry Block
* URL : https://github.com/bblock/Pyper
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C#
Description : Easily transform text into other forms
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: restish
Version : 0.12.1
Upstream Author : Matt Goodall
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/restish
* License : BSD
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-pytest-instafail
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Janne Vanhala
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pytest-instafail
* License : BSD
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-enum34
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Ethan Furman
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/enum34
* License : BSD
Programming Lang
an
SDL team which
ideally would be packaging it. Have they been contacted?
I am actually a member of that team but admittedly have not been keeping up
with it unfortunately. :(
Thanks,
- --
Barry deFreese
Sometimes helper, sometimes hinderer to:
Debian Gam
ther so packages can more easily cross the chasm.
Anyway, I've rambled enough. My intent wasn't to offend either community, but
just to say that Debian and Ubuntu work best when they appeal to their
strengths, but always strive for collaboration. And maybe there's opportunity
to
in pursuing this further, I suggest contacting Colin
Watson, who I think did most of the development to make this possible.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
y not realistic.
I'd love to have a --twice option in sbuild. Should it be the default?
Perhaps, though I would probably --once for most of my build debugging, at
least until a single pass build works reliably. Then I'd run it once more
with --twice before I blessed the local build.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
op, and it does make for a very quick and easy development cycle.
-Barry
[1] Even the first day after the stable release .
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2013-05-07 13:20:02 EDT, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:14:23AM -0400, Barry Fishman wrote:
>> 1) This bug is a month old and due to a Debian patch which was rejected
>>by the upstream kernel team.
>
> Perhaps you should tell us which that is, the
On 2013-04-22 19:40:01 EDT, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 18:21 -0400, Barry Fishman wrote:
>> Is anyone else seeing a boot hangup on wheezy with the linux/3.2.41-2 kernel
>> on systems with multiple display controllers?
>>
>> I filed the bug report o
is released.
--
Barry Fishman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/m3d2tmgq9x.fsf@barry_fishman.acm.org
Okay, fortunately, no bands are practicing tonight and no kids need homework
help, so let's see if I can answer some of these questions. :)
On Feb 07, 2013, at 08:54 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> Speaking with many hats on, I th
with
distros, Linux-based or otherwise. I thought we'd made a lot of good
progress, but some of the drivers moved on to other things. I'm hoping Nick
Coghlan's efforts at Pycon 2013 can help motivate a revival of this work[1].
Cheers,
-Barry
[1]
https://us.pycon.org/2013/community/openspaces/packaginganddistributionminisummit/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ouch
>anything dpkg is supposed to be managing.
>
>It's useful for installing crap from PyPI in a more or less standard,
>distro-agnostic manner.
This arrangement works pretty well for me in practice, especially since
`virtualenv --system-site-packages` can usually give y
e open:
https://github.com/paramiko/paramiko/issues/16
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
been on the other end of it in past jobs, where
Legal is no fun at all to interact with.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
an benefit from it. My patch has less
value as a patch that someone has to apply independently and rebuild.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Dec 04, 2012, at 02:29 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>It's currently tied to Python 2.7 (but not to a very high degree, it's
>totally backportable).
Mmm, Python 2. Would the authors be open to a Python 3 port? :)
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
