In both KDE (e.g. Konqueror, Kmail) and GNOME (e.g. gedit) applications
Cyrillic letters are displayed as double-width.
Ah, that was a long time ago that I had that problem. (But for me
mozilla used to have the problem too, not any more though)
I just tried again with gedit, and I cannot reproduce
Hi,
Until recently I only had a PGP key, and as
suggested by /usr/share/doc/debian-keyring/README.gz, I've
now generated a GPG one, signed it with my PGP key, and
submitted it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A couple of hours later I uploaded a package (fakeroot_0.4.4-5)
signed with my new GPG keys.
That
Je 1999/05/20(4)/10:05, Joost Kooij montris sian geniecon skribante:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 19 May 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > Joost Kooij wrote:
> > > Technically, I wholeheartedly agree with you in the above matter. The
> > > problem _at_hand_ is that a lot of people are seeing a "segmentation
> >
>
> Hello!
>
> On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 09:19:11PM +0200, joost witteveen wrote:
> >
> > > The document authors already can enforce a lot of things, keeping the
> > > document free:
> > >
> > [...]
> > > I want to hear valid reason
>
> A new mirror_2.9-1 is now on master. The copyright has changed (see below),
> and should be fine with us. Or is the 'changes must be distributed as
> patches' policy too restrictive for us?
>
> So here's the copyright:
>
>
>Copyright _ 1990 - 1998 Lee McLoughlin
>
>Permission to us
> 1) The document must be free but may require a change in the title for a
> modified version (for example "FSSTND" would become "Debians implementation
> of the FSSTND" or something without the acronym FSSTND at all).
>
> 2) Many authors don't want their work to be published out of their control
Hi, Joey,
At the moment it's really difficult for me to apply those patches to xaw*
Could I beg you (or anyone else) to do a NMU?
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6
MV:UY&?.Z16U9,1:MU)#V3[4&0:/@.-O.<%E^'C-(?S[;-/DGEKEE+.E1PH3G
M'G0YPQEJMY0)1;HWP32%>92]OYZT&!4)\0#1_"5SJ?B5)&-Z>I67D^A5PMZ"
MD\=M(K'%E$J>8&B_PY:5*R7$K#,&[0?-RP->]4H60G;QNO<:S-L*QVACRETC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>I'3,77A3\]54<38F
erms etc). If $visable set
+ (to anything other than "" or "none"), xterms &c will
+ not write logging info to utmp. (may not work for
+ your window manager).
+geometry: For X apps, this will be the size of the (main) window
+ that w
's. I wouldn't want netscape to appear in any such catogary.
> Calendar, xcalendar, I'm sure there are or soon will be others.
Yes, Calendar I agree: that belongs to something like "Personal".
joost witteveen,
(I'm preparing for my promotion 1998/1/7, and hav
ied by Makefile
dpkg-shlibdeps>
dpkg-shlibdeps> use POSIX;
dpkg-shlibdeps> use POSIX qw(:errno_h :signal_h);
Does anybody know what I did wrong?
The perl compile went really smoothly, but apparently something
went wrong?
Thanks (if anybody knows, anyway).
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PR
Kai into saying this, by extracting _one_ line from his email,
and claim it "can be very insulting".
Yes, this is not the right place for this discussion, I agree with you
there. But the discussion about Israel was started by you, Kai didn't
stay anthing that could be eighter be s
> * xaw3d-dev-1.3(see "ftp://ftp.x.org/contrib/widgets/Xaw3d/";)
>
> Is there already anybody working on these packages and thus making my
> efforts unnecessary?
Yes, xaw3d-dev will come up in a week or to.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr
> [ Please don't Cc: public replies to me. ]
>
> joost witteveen:
> > So, there's a first version of fakeroot sitting in
> >ftp://rulcmc.leidenuniv.nl/debian/upload
>
> I suggest a simpler solution, which doesn't require intricate
> hacking to w
all processes not in own session
unmount /home
(I'm hoping execv doesn't inherit open filediscriptors. The man page
doesn't mention anything about this, the execve manpage sais that
execve does inherit stuff).
> Thanks in advance
Well, actuall I don't think this all works, but hey, it
is about politics". The point is, the whole discussion wasn't about
politics, it was about POSIX time, and that _is_ relevant.
In short:
- The discussion is in _NO_ way related to politics (not international
politics anyway, maybe computational politics).
- don't extract _one_ line
so that doesn't work. I've
been testing it with "es" (yet another shell that I never heard
of, but I'm the maintainer).
[2] Well, I've olverloaded lstat all right, but it doesn't seem to
get called don't know why yet. Why would chown() work a
> On Jun 25, joost witteveen wrote
> > The only problem with this is that if there are setuid binaries involved
> > in the debian/rules binary process, they will not use the LD_PRELOAD
> > stuff, and things may go wrong. (But as long as those binaries are
> > setuid r
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
>
> > > Build a shared library which wraps all calls to chown(), then set
> > > LD_PRELOAD to that library. Should be pretty foolproof.
> > Yeah, I like that: wrap
rough that LD_PRELOAD lib.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
/usr/bin/xxx
Now if the chmod call in the middle _only_ writes the "fake permissiosn"
to the $FAKEROOT file, the third command will not work. However,
I planned to make the wrapper chmod function attempt to work
as expected (as long as it can, above it can), in addition to logging
the per
chown mail:sys file2
> > rm file2
> > ls -al file2
> >
> > I doubt whether these are important, and even if they are, I
> > guess it will be possible to get it right.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777
g 755, I say we revert them to 644.
>
The only reason I remember is that the shared libraries are
"executed", only not from the commandline, but within other binaries.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIB
e there's nothing to stop me from making a
working fakeroot package, but it's not this release isn't yet.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
7;t have it eighter.
(I need a libc6 dpkg for fakeroot).
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
(as above), and in the FAKEROOT_FILE you'd just record the "fake contents"
of /etc/passwd... Well, never mind.
The only problem with this is that if there are setuid binaries involved
in the debian/rules binary process, they will not use the LD_PRELOAD
stuff, and things may go wrong
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (joost witteveen) writes:
>
> > > 5. Conflicts & Dependencies for hamm packages
> > >
> > [..]
> > >
> > >The hamm libfoo package has to depend on libc6 and has to conflict
> > >with libfoo-dev and
> On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
>
> > (in fakt so much, that I may be tempted to write it myself. You
> > don't need that many changes).
>
> Well, you need to write your own version of make that looks for any attempt
> to run chmod, chown etc, and
Other package management utilities can take advantage of this field
> too...
But at the moment the file modification date on most mirrors reflects
the "Entered-Date" quite accurately.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO
in South Africa?
If my server is gonna be a "build server", I'd *very* much prefer
a modified dpkg-dev that allows for non-root package builds.
(in fakt so much, that I may be tempted to write it myself. You
don't need that many changes).
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTE
> On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
>
> > > So, what method do you prefer? Or do you have better ideas? How hard
> > > would it be to implement versioned Provides: in dpkg? Or are there
> > > other reasons not to implement it? Is solution 2) too kludgy?
or svgalib-1.2.11, but cannot find
it anywhere (yes they say "will address"). Is there anybody here who
knows where to find this?
I used to think them dec people were competent, but with a security
allert that doesn't even attempt to explain where the hole is, and
no possibility
**4 combinations = 2**128 = number of different md5sum's
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
antly different from what was in the original
> archive. If 'patch' isn't smart enough to create a directory that
> didn't exist originally, what can I do about it?
Patch is smart enough, it's just that dpkg isn't smart enough to
tell patch to be smart enough
dy conflicts with libc5-dev. And all old (bo) libcfoo-dev packages
should depend on libc5-dev anyway.
> [2] The location ../libc5-compat was introduced in the ldso package. As
> ldso is a package on all linus distributions we'll keep it for
s/linus/linux/
--
joost witteveen,
eam source, somebody
once reported that there was a security bug in 1.2.10, but the guy never
actually bothered to say what the bug was[1], so I'm not very inclined
to trust him).
[1] other than something as vague as "fails to surrender priveleges".
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PRO
g to do with C/C++.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
ource version is joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dpkg-buildpackage: build architecture is i386
sudo debian/rules clean
make clean
make[1]: Entering directory
`/mnt/bigfoot/shome/joost/maintain/libg++/libg++272-2.7.2.5'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `clean'. Stop.
make[
ow hard
> would it be to implement versioned Provides: in dpkg? Or are there
> other reasons not to implement it? Is solution 2) too kludgy?
I strongly prefer method 1. I really think dpkg should be improved,
but as that doesn't seem to happen any time soon, I don't think
method 2 wi
So what's the
problem? Just make your g77 package generate the gcc packages too,
and you could sometimes even have _less_ bytes move through your
modem!
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING
zy to
> go through all failing packages, here's a list of some of them,
> with the reason for the failure listed. Some packages failed
> because I didn't have the time to install the stuff they needed.
This list is "only" 40 packages. We've got about 10 times m
d
only 1 in for of those turn-of-century years are leap years. Maybe that
will change again. And about the seconds: we (currently, prossibly always)
simply cannot calulate the length of a day accurately enough to know
well in advance when to insert them. But I'd say the two animals are
at l
s better to have things look bad in the
past and good in the future, but the point is: we cannot change the
past. And the simple fackt is, that the past (also called "bo" or "hamm")
used libfoo-dev for the names. So, there's no way we can change bo/hamm
any more.
2, why not libg++27g, that's what
the standard tells us to use. I only chose libg++272 because
HJ Lu did that, and it doesn't seem to cause problems).
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
more work, as they
now have to decide what version of checker to install
(quite a hard choice for a newbie, I'd say).
- give the developper extra work
- give the mirrors more work, make debian even larger
(If you want to do this, why not simply say "strip /usr/lib/*"?
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
>
> > I would very much like to have a libc6 version of that package
> > available (no, I don't use svgalib myself, but some of my packages
> > do, and I want to fix bugs in them).
> &
should I just go ahead (well, I'll give
Larry a few more days, but then I'll just upload it).
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMA
versions that fail to install.
And even then, why not install lib5-altdev? Then there is no problem
whatsoever.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMA
; might rework it to use a real SGML DTD. I figure that SGML will be a
Jim> good fit, since the output is going to always be HTML.
Jim>
Jim> There are quite a few other things I want to add - when I'm done, it's
Jim> going to look nothing like the current dwww. The nice thing is, it will
Jim> be broken into separate pieces, so it will be easy for many people to
Jim> work on it and improve it simultaneously.
Jim>
Jim> Cheers,
Jim>
Jim> - Jim
Jim>
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
27;ll send you your account info pgp-encrypted, so you will need
pgp on your system.
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e
know what to do with it at the time, and I thought "don't fix
what ain't broken", but I've changed libg++272's priority now
to "Important"
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE F
> On Jun 12, joost witteveen wrote
> >
> > Well, OK, I can see *somebody* wants this.
> > But still I'm not convinced this warrants inclusion in stable.
> > Are there other people that would like the dependancy change
> >
> > - Depends: svgalib1 (
What has self-contained to do with Motif?
Anyway, Lars just posted a script to auto-build the whole distribution,
and I really think with such scripts (presumably improved ones, but
the one from Lars apparently already works) we will get a self-contained
distribution rather soon.
> They cou
v | /usr/{lib,include}
> libc5 | libfoo-g-altdev | /usr/i486-linuxlibc1/{lib,include}
Here again, unless I'm really confused, the "g" is mixed up.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE
ugs in them, that can then be reported, thus
forcing the maintainer to do something about it. But I don't think there
will be many of those packages.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail th
illing to do so.
My machine is connected to the internet via a 6kbyte/s link, so up/down
loading your (large) packages will not be very fast, but at least
it works.
Mail me if you want an account on my "unstable" machine.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777iht
promised) two weeks
of testing.
XFree 3.3 has important security fixes, and there seems to be no other
way to close the security holes currently in debian 1.3.0 than to include
Xfree 3.3, so there is a chance that will be included. I'm much less
sure about XEmacs 19.15 though, although
significant for people running Bo
> >as webservers, as they will probably not have gs installed eighter.
> >Or if they have serious reasons not to install svgalib, why do they
> >install xlib?
>
> Because they want to run remote X Sessions.
So it will at least not just b
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (joost witteveen) writes:
>
> > One possible solution is to link Xaw statically in the freeciv binary.
> > That's what I do with aXe.
>
> Or you can just use -rpath when you compile to force it to use a
> particular dynamically linked libXa*
2.0.3-4 The GNU C library version 2 (run-time files)
ii libc6-dbg 2.0.3-4 The GNU C library version 2 (debugging/profi
ii libc6-dev 2.0.3-4 The GNU C library version 2 (development fil
ii libc6-doc 2.0.3-4 The GNU C library version 2 (documentation f
In short, thanks for the clarification
> Xaw95 but not the standard widget set).
One possible solution is to link Xaw statically in the freeciv binary.
That's what I do with aXe.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the w
f a modifying the package isn't allowed, then it cannot go
into the main archive, and has to go into non-free, even if you're
allowed to make money distributing it.
Non-free it is
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
T
the kernel.
> (where can i find the reasons, why kernel headers are in libc ? i know
> that nearly anybody sais, that this is the right way, but sometimes i
> get frustrated and start to disbelief).
/usr/doc/lib5/FAQ.gz -- where else?
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/bin/perl -sp
depends on libc5-dev), etc. I believe it's the same with
X libs.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i
ay, to help you with something else (see debian-bugs), I also
tried to unpack xkobo, and only succeded after downgrading my patch-2.2
(unstable) to patch-2.1 (from bo). Probably the real bug is in dpkg, though.
(sending this to the mailinglist in case other people still want to know this).
--
joost
> On May 11, joost witteveen wrote
> > I just downgraded my ldso from the one in unstable, to the one
> > in bo, and I appear to be left with a system that doesn't have
> > a dynamic linker!
>
> This is because of a change from a hard link to a symlink in one o
inary: nfsroot
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
nfsroot- Set up server to allow nfsroot clients to boot.
Changes:
nfsroot (0.0) unstable; urgency=low
.
* initial version.
Fil
with:
gs -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=842 -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595 -dDEVICEWIDTH=100
-dDEVICEHEIGHT=100 Q.ps
and gs usually only uses the last defention on the commandline, but here
it apparently uses the first one. So, I'll indeed have to change
the wrapper. Thanks
--
joost witteveen
packages to the new source format -- but I must be overlooking
something very obvious (I'm sure), as I cannot find this eighter.
Thanks a lot,
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
uts it in
ghostscript/$VERSION/fonts, but if you (and someone else, too) prefers
them in ghostscript/fonts, I'll move them.
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
ell.
So, basically I think this is a gcc problem, that gcc should solve
(with a little assistance from g77, (the symlink) to tell gcc where
to look for f771).
But I don't know how David (gcc maintainer) think s about this,
so I cc'd him on this.
David?
> Alan
>
> (g77 and f2c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 29 Aug 96 21:19 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gs
Version: 4.01-4
Binary: gs
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
gs: Postscript interpreter with X11 and svgalib p
n
(and for the bug-reports those of you who didn't read this are going
to send),
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 28 Aug 96 21:19 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gs
Version: 4.01-3
Binary: gs
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
gs: Postscript interpreter with X11 and svgalib p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 28 Aug 96 18:39 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gs
Version: 3.33-1
Binary: gs
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
gs: Postscript interpreter with X11 and svgalib p
#x27;s very nice, all you prospective xosview buggers: try procmeter!)
Although I guess the upstream maintainer would be interested
to correct this one, I think, togehter with the other ones, I'll
just try to move xosview to contrib.
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
on maintaining a broken xosview?
Sometimes, I really don't know what to do.
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
the
standard Xt interface, but he didn't say when.
Xosview-1.4.1 AFAIK doesn't use it.
I'm closing this bug, as I cannot do anything about it, and
the upstream maintainer doesn't care.
Thanks anyway,
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 24 Aug 96 07:47 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: screen
Version: 3.7.1-8
Binary: screen
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
screen: A screen manager with VT100/ANSI te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 21 Aug 96 17:23 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: pixmap
Version: 2.6pl2-1
Binary: pixmap
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
pixmap: A pixmap editor.
Changes:
* up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 21 Aug 96 17:00 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: screen
Version: 3.7.1-7
Binary: screen
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
screen: A screen manager with VT100/ANSI te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 20 Aug 96 17:28 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gsfonts
Version: 4.01-2
Binary: gsfonts
Architecture: all source
Description:
gsfonts: Fonts for the ghostscript inter
y would we discriminate against czech?
Then again, I come from Europe to, and my first language isn't English
eighter.
Good luck with your packages!
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 16 Aug 96 19:51 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: pixmap
Version: 2.6pl1-5
Binary: pixmap
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
pixmap: A pixmap editor.
Changes:
- Up
I am unsure I've done the right thing with the
patch, I don't want to upload the new pixmap to master.
I've put it on ftp://rulcmc.leidenuniv.nl/joost/pixmap_2.6pl1_4*
for you (and other interested parties) to try out, and
I've asked the pixmap mailinglist for more
aybe it's worth the little
extra efford of mailing the patches to the maintainer/bug-system
and wait to see them included in the next release?
If you don't want to do that, could you send your patches to me,
so that try to handle it?
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 15 Aug 96 21:21 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: pixmap
Version: 2.6pl1-3
Binary: pixmap
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
pixmap: A pixmap editor.
Changes:
- Fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 15 Aug 96 15:44 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gs
Version: 4.01-2
Binary: gs
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
gs: Postscript interpreter with X11 and svgalib p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 15 Aug 96 11:53 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gsfonts
Version: 4.01-1
Binary: gsfonts
Architecture: all source
Description:
gsfonts: Fonts for the ghostscript inter
t I can do about this -- it's really
not just what paths it searches, it's also how it parses the
appdefauls files (all manually).
So if you've got any better ideas, I'd like to close this bug.
But thanks for the bug-report anyway, it's nice to know
people use xosview.
--
j
nged to have "Optional: as default,
instead of the current "extra").
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
ror (he uploaded
a known buggy xosview even without mailing me in advance of doing so).
Thanks.
BTW Ian also sent mail to debian-devel saying that this bug was in
his uploaded version.
xosview-1.3.2-6 doesn't contain this bug.
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
eaningfull name, no?) and the wrapper as 'gs'
> of course. Apparently people were confused by your gs-papersize being
> the gs that does not handle papersize despite its name.
So, that's not the case any more (the real gs is gs.real, the wrapper
is gs).
What is causing m
sn't depend on libpaper, and has been reading
/etc/papersize before the existance of libpaper.)
I do wonder if libpaper does a better job, and I do wonder if
gs really should read "A4 ". Some people were really glad I
added a wrapper to allow gs to read /etc/papersize. Some are
angry
weren't that bad after all, and I
only needed to change axinfo in one place.
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 04 Aug 96 14:33 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: axe
Version: 6.1.2-5
Binary: axe
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
axe: An editor for X.
Changes:
* changed axinf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 22 Jul 96 12:02 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: xosview
Version: 1.3.2-6
Binary: xosview
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
xosview: Fun to watch CPU/network usage pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 16 Jul 96 21:17 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: axe
Version: 6.1.2-4
Binary: axe
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
axe: An editor for X.
Changes:
corrected inf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 15 Jul 96 22:02 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: transfig
Version: 3.1.2a-3
Binary: transfig
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
transfig: Utilities for printing figure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 03 Jul 96 10:38 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: xfig
Version: 3.1.4b-4
Binary: xfig
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
xfig: Facility for Interactive Generation of f
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
