Hi Ted,
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 4:54 AM Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> So it's stupid stuff like the choice of compilers and CFLAGS
At this point, wireguard-tools package is reproducible actually. At
some point it wasn't, due to some older versions (but not all older
versions!) of make(1) passing GLO
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 05:15:16PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> The comment itself doesn't indicate to me (upstream) much at all, and
> a pretty ordinary attempt to figure out what it means didn't yield
> much
Hi Jason,
At least in my experience, most of the time when there are
reproduc
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:01:35AM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Unfortunately, this message is still non-ideal, because it contains a dead
> link.
I left the dead link as as such it still contained useful information,
while removing the link would have removed that info.
(And now the is
(got a "550 5.6.0 improper use of 8-bit data in message header",
resending without S-MIME signature, sorry for the duplicate)
Holger Levsen wrote:
I've improve it like this now:
$ git log -p -1
commit 172f203eab628bd5df0106b33153dc428d12dd5c
Author: Holger Levsen
Date: Tue Jan 21 18:07:14
Hi Jason,
thanks for reaching out to us!
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 05:15:16PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> I received a reply about not providing "private support"
I believe this is some unfortunate wording from someone to busy. I
believe it was meant to say "please send this request to a
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 5:25 PM Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> > "Jonathan" == Jonathan Carter writes:
>
> Jonathan> On 2020/01/21 16:43, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> >> This note doesn't make sense. It's either entirely invalid or so poorly
> >> written that it's useless. As the author of
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 5:10 PM Jonathan Carter wrote:
>
> On 2020/01/21 16:43, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > This note doesn't make sense. It's either entirely invalid or so poorly
> > written that it's useless. As the author of the code in question, I've
> > been unable to ascertain what the not
> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Carter writes:
Jonathan> On 2020/01/21 16:43, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> This note doesn't make sense. It's either entirely invalid or so poorly
>> written that it's useless. As the author of the code in question, I've
>> been unable to ascertain wha
On 2020/01/21 16:43, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> This note doesn't make sense. It's either entirely invalid or so poorly
> written that it's useless. As the author of the code in question, I've
> been unable to ascertain what the note is about, and an email to the note
> author hasn't yielded any u
This note doesn't make sense. It's either entirely invalid or so poorly
written that it's useless. As the author of the code in question, I've
been unable to ascertain what the note is about, and an email to the note
author hasn't yielded any understanding.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld
---
10 matches
Mail list logo
