At Sat, 23 Aug 2003 03:59:53 +0900,
Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
I uploaded ruby1.6 and ruby-defaults (1.6.8-6) now.
Packages built from ruby1.6 source package is simply renamed from
ruby 1.6.8-5.
I plan ruby 1.8 transition:
- Wait a while until ruby1.6 and ruby-defaults are installed,
Hi,
I uploaded ruby1.6 and ruby-defaults (1.6.8-6) now.
Packages built from ruby1.6 source package is simply renamed from
ruby 1.6.8-5.
I plan ruby 1.8 transition:
- Wait a while until ruby1.6 and ruby-defaults are installed,
because these are NEW packages.
- Keep ruby-defaults to 1.6 for
At Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:37:17 -0500,
Joe Wreschnig wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 12:53, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
Joe Wreschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libtest-unit-ruby1.8 (- libtest-unit-ruby)
Actually, I now only maintain Test::Unit for Ruby 1.6. Since it became
included with 1.8, akira yamada
At Thu, 21 Aug 2003 20:33:10 +0300,
Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:53:12AM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
FU Dmitry Borodaenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FU libyaml-ruby1.8 (- libyaml-ruby)
I think that since whytheluckystiff is developing Syck/YAML right in the
Ruby CVS,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:53:12AM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
FU Dmitry Borodaenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FU libyaml-ruby1.8 (- libyaml-ruby)
I think that since whytheluckystiff is developing Syck/YAML right in the
Ruby CVS, there is little chance for a separation of libyaml-ruby1.8 in
the near
Hi,
I've wrote initial draft of debian ruby policy
http://pkg-ruby.alioth.debian.org/ruby-policy.html/index.html
Comments are welcome.
First, I'll intent to package ruby-defaults soon, which provides ruby and
libruby packages in which this ruby policy documents is included, and
rename current
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 12:53, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
Joe Wreschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libtest-unit-ruby1.8 (- libtest-unit-ruby)
Actually, I now only maintain Test::Unit for Ruby 1.6. Since it became
included with 1.8, akira yamada maintains that version, and when 1.8 was
packaged I dropped
7 matches
Mail list logo