Re: APT-Fu 0.2.3 (was: Re: Building Debian Completely From Source)

2003-12-09 Thread Miles Bader
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > p.s. why Apt-Fu ? Is that 'APT Kung-Fu' or what ? Hmm, after apt-src, > apt-build, and similar 'build that debian source package' tools, I've been > expecting for 'apt-too' ;-) FWIW, the `fu' in kung-fu means something like style or technique, so apt

Re: APT-Fu 0.2.3 (was: Re: Building Debian Completely From Source)

2003-12-09 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 12:20, Eric Wong wrote: > Eric Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --cut-- > > OK, I'll do my best to have all the changes you requested done and > > tested by tomorrow. Let me know if you have any other feature requests > > and/or bug reports. First of all, thank you ve

APT-Fu 0.2.3 (was: Re: Building Debian Completely From Source)

2003-12-09 Thread Eric Wong
Eric Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:48:21PM -0800, Eric Wong wrote: > > I have one feature request: I'd like to have an option so that I can ask > > it to rebuild arch-indep packages just like it rebuilds other packages. > >