On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:59:11PM +0100, Peter Rice wrote:
On 16/09/2013 11:31, Faheem Mitha wrote:
This is really not Debian-related, except insofar as the software in
question is something that might have been in Debian one day. I talked
about that with people on debian-med recently. So, it
Hi Steve,
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:59:11PM +0100, Peter Rice wrote:
On 16/09/2013 11:31, Faheem Mitha wrote:
This is really not Debian-related, except insofar as the software in
question is something that might have been in Debian one day. I
]] Steve Langasek
The real rationale is surely that, because facts are *not governed by
copyright*, any licensing claim over this data is ignorable.
Copyrights are not the any type of «IP» that may require
licensing. Database rights exist in Europe for instance.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Peter Rice wrote:
However, I have run into this issue before in the context of
biological database entries and Debian so it may be worth discussing
here. There were objections to including SwissProt entries in the
example data for the EMBOSS package because the
Hi Peter,
Thank you for your very helpful answer. Seriously, it is rare to get
such a good answer on such a topic. I actually read your response on
academia.sx before you saw your email, and I should have guessed such
a good reason would have come from a Debian person. Also, I see you
Hi,
This is really not Debian-related, except insofar as the software in
question is something that might have been in Debian one day. I talked
about that with people on debian-med recently. So, it is technically
off-topic.
However, I thought that maybe people on these lists would have
I am not a lawyer but I don't think facts are copyrightable. In some
jurisdictions there are database rights and copyright on collections
of facts (like phone books) that could apply here. I suggest you
consult the lawyers for your research institute for the legal
situation in your jurisdiction.
On 16/09/2013 11:31, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Hi,
This is really not Debian-related, except insofar as the software in
question is something that might have been in Debian one day. I talked
about that with people on debian-med recently. So, it is technically
off-topic.
I posted a reply on
It looks like both you and the site you wish to access are based in
France, so please forgive this US-centric intrusion.
Under US law, it may be the case that violating website terms of service
is a felony crime with jail time attached.
Jeff Epler writes:
Under US law, it may be the case that violating website terms of
service is a felony crime with jail time attached.
The USA Federal courts have made it clear that this is not the case. As
far as I know there have been no convictions or even prosecutions under
this theory. A
10 matches
Mail list logo
