Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort

2008-02-23 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:30:43PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 03:43:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > Colin Watson: telegnome > > > > If there is a package you love in that list, it'd be _really_ great to > > send patches to migrate them to gn

Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort

2008-02-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 03:43:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Colin Watson: telegnome > > If there is a package you love in that list, it'd be _really_ great to > send patches to migrate them to gnome2/gtk2 libraries[0]. With the consent of the previous upstream maint

Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort

2008-02-18 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Anibal Avelar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi. I'm working on this programs (to porting to gtk2): > > > > Sergio Rua: gmanedit (ready 80%) Please also correct the debian/changelog encoding in that package. I could

Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort

2008-02-18 Thread Anibal Avelar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. I'm working on this programs (to porting to gtk2): > Sergio Rua: gmanedit (ready 80%) > Marcela Tiznado:gtkgo (ready 70%) > Aurelien Labrosse: xwine (ready 70%) > chbg (libgno

Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort

2008-02-18 Thread Anibal Avelar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Christian, On 2/11/08, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Hi there, > > > > I'm working for about a month to remove all the old bits of gnome 1.x > > from Debian for lenny. There was about 40 packages

Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort

2008-02-11 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hi there, > > I'm working for about a month to remove all the old bits of gnome 1.x > from Debian for lenny. There was about 40 packages affected not so long > time ago, it's 13 now (about half were migrated or dropped the > dependency one way or

Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort

2008-02-11 Thread H. S. Teoh
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 03:43:38PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: [...] > As a side note, those packages have spurious build-dependencies on > gnome1.x libraries (and have no corresponding runtime dependencies), > bugs will be filed soon: [...] Also, on a related note, while preparing glotski