Re: Bug#23436: vrwave should maybe go in contrib?

1998-06-16 Thread Fabien Ninoles
On Mon, Jun 15, 1998 at 11:04:04PM +0200, Remco Blaakmeer wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a wrote: > > > > > Well, vrwave only needs a java runtime environment to run. The > > dependancies I've marked are related to jdk 1.1 (jdk1.1-runtime) or jdk > > 1.0.2 (jdk-sh

Re: Bug#23436: vrwave should maybe go in contrib?

1998-06-15 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a wrote: > > Well, vrwave only needs a java runtime environment to run. The > dependancies I've marked are related to jdk 1.1 (jdk1.1-runtime) or jdk > 1.0.2 (jdk-shared OR jdk-static). Alas, I sent a mail to wnpp because I > don't like thi

Re: Bug#23436: vrwave should maybe go in contrib?

1998-06-15 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a
Well, vrwave only needs a java runtime environment to run. The dependancies I've marked are related to jdk 1.1 (jdk1.1-runtime) or jdk 1.0.2 (jdk-shared OR jdk-static). Alas, I sent a mail to wnpp because I don't like this either, I would prefer a "Depends: java (=> 1.0.2)" and let the pac