Nikolaus Schulz, 2006-08-08 11:50:08 +0200 :
> ... which is something I'd expect to find in ~/bin, but not as the
> single functionality of a Debian package.
moreutils then?
Roland.
--
Roland Mas
If you're ever confused as to which mode you're in, keep entering the
key until vi beeps at you.
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 23:15 +0200, Bart Martens a écrit :
> > Instead of editing the scripts in /etc/init.d to give daemons the
> > nicelevel you want (and get prompted at every package update because
> > these files are conffiles) you can just run reniced once a d
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:52:50PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1436 +0100]:
> > reniced does not wait for new processes to act on them. It is
> > designed to be run once a day and affect the processes running in
> > that moment.
>
>
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is the naming so much of an issue? (I always confuse
>> kernel-threads and KDE applications because both start with k)
>
> Well, *d suggests it's a permanently running programme, which yours
> is not. So I'd say, yes.
You could call it "rerenice" (=
also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.04.0038 +0100]:
> To my surprise the description line of my package is quite exact:
> "renice running processes based on regular expressions"
>
> It clearly says "running" and not "new" or "spawning".
I don't think it's clear in any way.
>
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:52:50PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1436 +0100]:
> > reniced does not wait for new processes to act on them. It is
> > designed to be run once a day and affect the processes running in
> > that moment.
> T
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 23:15 +0200, Bart Martens a écrit :
> > Instead of editing the scripts in /etc/init.d to give daemons the
> > nicelevel you want (and get prompted at every package update because
> > these files are conffiles) you can jus
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:26:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> reniced /(g(cc|++)|c(c|++))/ 15
How about ``pgrep '(g(cc|\+\+)|c(c|\+\+))' | xargs renice 15''?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:52:50PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1436 +0100]:
> > reniced does not wait for new processes to act on them. It is
> > designed to be run once a day and affect the processes running in
> > that moment.
>
>
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1436 +0100]:
>> reniced does not wait for new processes to act on them. It is
>> designed to be run once a day and affect the processes running in
>> that moment.
>
> Then don't call it renic
also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1436 +0100]:
> reniced does not wait for new processes to act on them. It is
> designed to be run once a day and affect the processes running in
> that moment.
Then don't call it renice*d*, please.
--
Please do not send copies of list
martin f krafft wrote:
>also sprach Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.02.2308 +0100]:
>> Out of curiosity, what real-life uses does this tool have? Daemons
>> don't need to be reniced, so there must be something else.
> reniced /(g(cc|++)|c(c|++))/ 15
> or whatever the syntax is. I o
Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> Wow, that sounds like an annoying bug just waiting to get reported!
> (Having to edit scripts in /etc/init.d is an exceptionally bad way
> to configure a daemon.)
This is about daemons that are not designed to be configured in that
way. The "easiest" solution was to j
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 12:08:48AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 23:15 +0200, Bart Martens a écrit :
> > Instead of editing the scripts in /etc/init.d to give daemons the
> > nicelevel you want (and get prompted at every package update because
> > these files are co
> Of course, the problem is that gcc spawns many processes, and if
> reniced only takes a little while to react to a new gcc process, the
> children won't be reniced.
>
If I understand correctly the description, reniced is not actually a
daemon but a program that you run from time to time, so not
also sprach Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.02.2308 +0100]:
> Out of curiosity, what real-life uses does this tool have? Daemons don't
> need to be reniced, so there must be something else.
reniced /(g(cc|++)|c(c|++))/ 15
or whatever the syntax is. I often wanted to have such a feat
Le mercredi 02 août 2006 à 23:15 +0200, Bart Martens a écrit :
> Instead of editing the scripts in /etc/init.d to give daemons the
> nicelevel you want (and get prompted at every package update because
> these files are conffiles) you can just run reniced once a day.
Out of curiosity, what real
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 15:15, Bart Martens wrote:
> Instead of editing the scripts in /etc/init.d to give daemons the
> nicelevel you want (and get prompted at every package update because
> these files are conffiles) you can just run reniced once a day.
Wow, that sounds like an annoying b
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 23:04 +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:28:16 +0200
> Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi Bart,
>
> >
> > * Package name: reniced
> > Vers
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:28:16 +0200
Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Bart,
>
> * Package name: reniced
> Version : 1.5
> Upstream Author : Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: reniced
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cgarbs.de/stuff.en.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description
21 matches
Mail list logo
