It seems that we could also read the requested versions of automake and
autoconf from debian/control and export them automatically using:
[...]
Does this sound like a good idea?
IMHO this sounds like a very good idea.
Consequently, dh_autoreconf should become a no-op if autoconf is
missing
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org wrote:
Description : debhelper add-on to call autoreconf and clean up after
the build
Package: dh-autoreconf
I'd suggest just putting this into debhelper rather than making it a
separate package.
--
bye,
pabs
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:07:31PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Package: dh-autoreconf
I'd suggest just putting this into debhelper rather than making it a
separate package.
Seconded. The addons looks quite general, I don't see the point of
having it in a separate package.
Cheers.
--
Stefano
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:07:31PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org wrote:
Description : debhelper add-on to call autoreconf and clean up after
the build
Package: dh-autoreconf
I'd suggest just putting this into
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:13:14PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org
wrote:
Description : debhelper add-on to call autoreconf and clean up
after the build
Package: dh-autoreconf
I'd suggest
Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org wrote:
Description : debhelper add-on to call autoreconf and clean up after
the build
Package: dh-autoreconf
I'd suggest just putting this into debhelper rather than making it a
separate
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:13:14PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org
wrote:
Description : debhelper add-on to call autoreconf and clean up
after the build
Package:
Am Mittwoch, den 31.03.2010, 15:45 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:13:14PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org
wrote:
Description : debhelper add-on to
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:45:14PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:13:14PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org
wrote:
Description : debhelper add-on to
On 31/03/2010 15:45, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
I do use autoreconf and I don't have these changes in my diff.
Do you remove the modified files in your clean target ? (removed files will be
ignored when creating the diff but you need to list them explicitely in
debian/rules: this is what I do
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
IMO, a backup/restore script (where you specify the list of files to
backup) may be more useful. It would be called before build and when
cleaning.
I don't think so, it requires you to keep track of the files
and you may miss some.
OTOH,
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
A 'debuild; debuild' should have a different result than a single
debuild then. If you build from a clean directory, the first build
will contain no changes. But after the build, the directory is not
clean anymore and debian/rules clean does not do enough to keep the
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 04:46:00PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
A 'debuild; debuild' should have a different result than a single
debuild then. If you build from a clean directory, the first build
will contain no changes. But after the build, the directory is not
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
A backup and restore approach is a completely different and more
complicated (in I/O sense) way than just deleting the files; e.g.
for a single file:
… except that they do not operate on the same set of files. dh_backup's
list would be a lot smaller than
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Is there any advantage to have it packaged?
AIUI, you have to add a build-dependency anyway and change at least one
line in the debian/rules to call dh-autoreconf. Well, that line could
simply call autoreconf (or whatever) which even makes debian/rules
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org
* Package name: dh-autoreconf
Version : 1
Upstream Author : Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : debhelper add-on to call autoreconf
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:15:26PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org
* Package name: dh-autoreconf
Version : 1
Upstream Author : Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org
* License : GPL-2
17 matches
Mail list logo
