Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi, Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). The packages have been selected based on the following criteria: * The package had at least one RC bug without activity for the past 14 days. * If a bug is assigned

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Paul Wise
Control: severity -1 grave Control: reassign -1 debhelper 9.20130518 Control: affects -1 + src:xgalaga++ Control: tags -1 - jessie The FTBFS bug against xgalaga++ (#707481) is caused by debhelper, it builds fine with debhelper 9.20120909 but not with debhelper 9.20130518. It appears that debhelper

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 04/06/13 14:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > The packages have been selected based on the following criteria: > * The package had at least one RC bug without acti

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Joey Hess
Paul Wise wrote: > Control: severity -1 grave > Control: reassign -1 debhelper 9.20130518 > Control: affects -1 + src:xgalaga++ > Control: tags -1 - jessie > > The FTBFS bug against xgalaga++ (#707481) is caused by debhelper, it > builds fine with debhelper 9.20120909 but not with debhelper > 9.20

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Joey Hess
Seems I confused xgalaga with xgalaga++, which does use dh. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)
On 04/06/2013 14:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > The packages have been selected based on the following criteria: > * The package had at least one RC bug without ac

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Holger Levsen
On Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Thanks a lot for this initiative! I hope this leads to a shorter freeze > this cycle. +1 - keep the removals coming ;-) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > The packages have been selected based on the following criteria: > * The package had at least one

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-04 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Ma, 04 iun 13, 14:06:26, Niels Thykier wrote: > > [1] We normally filter out certain type of RC bugs (incl. but not > limited to license issues), where we consider it unreasonable to demand > a resolution within the usual deadline (i.e. 14 days of "non-activity" + > 7 days after a d-d notice).

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:37:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > > > The packages have

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013, "Rodolfo García Peñas (kix)" wrote: > On 04/06/2013 14:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > > > The packages have been selected based on the

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 04-06-13 14:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > [1] We normally filter out certain type of RC bugs (incl. but not > limited to license issues), where we consider it unreasonable to demand > a resolution within the usual deadline (i.e. 14 days of "non-activity" + > 7 days after a d-d notice). > # #7

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On 05-06-13 18:30, Michael Tautschnig wrote: >> I also like it, somewhat, but am also aware of this approach rendering >> unstable more stable than testing. I would prefer another kind of punishment >> for neglect / some difficulty than the mere removal. > > In what way exactly would this effort e

Aw: Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi, > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:37:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > > > > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > > > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > > > > > > The p

Re: Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> Hi, > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:37:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > > > > > > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have > > > > found 79 potential candidates (see attached files). > >

Re: Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2013-06-04)

2013-06-05 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:15:14PM +0200, "Steffen Möller" a écrit : > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:37:54AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Le Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:06:26PM +0200, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > > > > > > > Our automated tools for finding RC buggy leaf packages in testing have