On Sat, 10 Oct 1998, Bill Mitchell wrote:
As of debian 2.0, mawk and sed are `required' packages, so they should be
present on any debian system.
Only the essential flag (or the base-files trick) guarantees a package to
be present in the system and allows a package not to have an explicit
On Fri, 9 Oct 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Geoffrey L. Brimhall wrote:
Just like debian has an official standard shell - bash, does debian have an
official scripting language ?
Even if bash is essential, the standard shell is sh, not bash.
[ If you look at our
Just like debian has an official standard shell - bash, does debian have an
official scripting language ?
If so, is it perl, python, etc ?
The reason I'm asking is largely questions of disk space - ie minimizing the
number of scripting languages installed on a system by writing a package which
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 02:09:48AM -0700, Geoffrey L. Brimhall wrote:
Just like debian has an official standard shell - bash, does debian have an
official scripting language ?
If so, is it perl, python, etc ?
Yes, Bourne Shell :- Bash implements most features of it, afaik.
I really wish
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Geoffrey L. Brimhall wrote:
Just like debian has an official standard shell - bash, does debian have an
official scripting language ?
Even if bash is essential, the standard shell is sh, not bash.
[ If you look at our shell scripts, most of them are /bin/sh, not
/bin/bash
*-Geoffrey L. Brimhall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| Just like debian has an official standard shell - bash, does debian have an
| official scripting language ?
|
| If so, is it perl, python, etc ?
|
| The reason I'm asking is largely questions of disk space - ie minimizing the
| number of scripting
6 matches
Mail list logo
