Hi. I like to make a request regarding the Debian Linux kernel.
I think the "tux boot" should be compiled with the Debian logo..
With tux boot I mean that some distros e.g. Arch and slackware boots with
the logo
while displaying the boot process.
just a note to tell you that I installed the Kali 5.2.9 kernel into Debian
10with dpkg -i -a AND it worked !!
there were two pkgs for it. load averages are now very low.
I tried with the source but it failed !! don't know why ??Oh.. this was in a
VMware 15.0 virtual machine.
a
For kernel-related discussions, ask on debian-kernel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian Mays writes ("Re: kernel-source and kernel-headers packages"):
> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Can't these be retired ?
...
> > Why not just ship the (debianised, obviously) source to the
> > kernels we ship as .tar.gz and .diff.
n users (most methods of delivering such
products to the end-user are focussed on .deb format (dftp, dpkg-ftp,
and cdrom distributors)), so if Debian is to provide the sources, it
should be in this form (I dislike to think that there is a special
case made for the kernel sources).
I thi
Hi,
I've been using self compiled kernels throughout the years and up to
2.4.18 never experienced a problem. But Now I tried switching to the
debian kernel and cannot do that at all. When using 2.4.18 the first try
ends before "Uncompressing ..." is written on the screen. A rese
Hi all
I've configured and built the kernel, using gcc-2.95, make bzImage and
modules, installed modules under /lib/modules/2.5.68. Everything goes
fine except for a bunch of depmod errors during the 'make
modules_install' which I'm guessing is because the new modules don&
Hi
I want to ask you what you think of the netbooted kernel(packages?)
I inted to package.
There are a couple of issues:
*1* Should I use the "standard" configuration and add the
nfsroot thing and then compile. This means a lot of packages.
Or should I make one generic packge (for i38
Hi *,
while I do compile my own kernel from source, I do like infarstructure
from debian packages like reiserfs userspace progs; same for xfs and
lvm. If I grep a vanilla Kernel from kernel.org I usually get the
patches and patch my kernel up-to-date. Same methods are used to
expand vanilla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Just to bring that back to discussion:
With lenny the provided glibc seems to be incompatible to kernel 2.4.
There are many systems out there still running with kernel 2.4 cause
stability. (My servers which needs to be stable all run Kernel 2.4
I downloaded the sources for the 2.0.34 kernel and did a quick look through
the files. The fat-32 patches do not seem to be in here. If 2.0.34 is to
be released as a debian package, then I hope all of the patches that are in
the 2.0.33 package are added.
Also has anyone packaged the Real Time
Hi,
I've recently try to install new kernel. Somethings go wrong and I
cannot found solution. There is some problem with configuration. It
seems to me, that this problem is not unique. Does anybody know how to
solve ti?
> 1. Who is responsible for kernel versions? If you use a kernel version
> less than 1.3.43 you'll need to apply a patch. So I probably need
> to know the maintainers of the 1.2.x and 1.3.y versions.
I am the victim who issues the Debian-ized kernel.
I have a problem he
[presumably you are not subscribed, CCing you]
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Pontus Andersson
wrote:
> Hi. I like to make a request regarding the Debian Linux kernel.
> I think the "tux boot" should be compiled with the Debian logo..
> With tux boot I mean that some di
Heyho!
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 22.57:51 Pontus Andersson wrote:
> Hi. I like to make a request regarding the Debian Linux kernel.
> I think the "tux boot" should be compiled with the Debian logo..
> With tux boot I mean that some distros e.g. Arch and slackware boots with
Hi!
Note that there is another way to display a Debian logo at boot.
Plymouth: http://wiki.debian.org/plymouth
Though it wont show you the logs unless you type Alt+F1, you will have
a debian logo at boot time.
Besides that: Anyone thought about doing a loading screen from the
Debian Swirl go
I demand that Adrian von Bidder may or may not have written...
[snip]
> As Paul has said, there is a patch to include the Debian logo at boot. As
> far as I know, the kernel still displays the traditional penguin at boot if
> a framebuffer is used, but note that on recent systems frameb
c6-dev FAQ. I have also
> posted it in a related document.
>
> I think I have changed my mind. I think libc6 should really
> get a package all its own, called libc6-kernel-headers. I do not know
> whether I can push it into 2.0, but I shall try.
Please do. I had not realized I h
On Sun, Apr 12, 1998 at 11:38:18PM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
>
> Also, I now see what you ment by your "ticking time-bomb" comment. If you
> change the symlinks, user programs are no longer in sync with glibc. This
> can, as Linus pointed out in your quoted text, cause "interesting"
> failures
on. I now understand how the kernel
> headers used for glibc have been "decoupled" from the kernel include
> headers.
Indeed that's two of us. Thanks Manoj
pgp0qnsyyXldx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Rev. Joseph Carter wrote:
> A question which comes to my curious mind... is there a way a program
> running as root can ask the kernel things like "do you support modules and
> module versioning?" or is the above script which hung my machine without
> so much as an oops f
On Mon, Apr 13, 1998 at 12:56:49PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > A question which comes to my curious mind... is there a way a program
> > running as root can ask the kernel things like "do you support modules and
> > module versioning?" or is the above script w
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-30
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kernel-patch-systrace
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Niels Provos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace/
* License : BSD
Descr
This is not a lilo bug. The problem is that lilo's map installer
did not get run during the kernel upgrade process. The fact that
the user was able to boot his old de-installed kernel is proof of
this. The /boot/map file still pointed to the blocks in the file
system which formerly cont
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've
> been running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel. Though I didn't change what
> modules I load, with this new kernel package have come a whole bunch of
> new modules that
Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn said on Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:42:53PM +0200:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
>
> > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've
> > been running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel. Though I didn't change what
> &g
From: "Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
>
> > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've
> > been running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel. Though I didn't change what
> > m
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn said on Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:42:53PM +0200:
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> >
> > > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've
> > > been running the
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Derek Broughton wrote:
> From: "Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote:
> >
> > > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now,
> > > I've been runn
Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn said on Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:57:34PM +0200:
> With all due respect for the our kernel maintainer, Herbert Xu, throwing
> up all those ide-driver modules (on a scsi only box, or anywhere else) is
> IMHO insane :(
The IDE modules were there before, on your SCSI
Hi all,
I'm new to Debian so sorry for this newbie question ;)
Why do not the linux-source-2.6.* packages provide linux-kernel-headers?
Regards,
Cyril Jaquier
P.S. Please, do not forget to CC me because I am not subscribed to the list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Herbert, would it be possible to get the ACL kernel patch included in the
Debian kernel source?
Much of this patch is scheduled to be included in 2.4.24, so the work required
will be decreasing. The patch is already in 2.6.0-test kernels so it does
not require anything to be carried forward
Hi!
I have put my alternative packages of the Linux kernel in an APT repository
in gluck, so that interested people can use it untill the ftp-masters
enable the overrides.
Lines for your sources.list file:
deb http://people.debian.org/~rmh/debian ./
deb-src http
Just curious: any particular reason why the kernel version is reported
as "100" on http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages?
kernel-image-2.6-386 (100)
Linux kernel image for version 2.6 on 386.
kernel-image-2.6-686 (100)
Linux kernel image for version 2.6 on PPro/Celero
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> makes it boot but later I get a lost interrupt on hda. Now I installed
> 2.4.19 and do get that message about bios checksum or so. But after that
> it stands still again.
Which 2.4.19 kernel package did you install and what is the exac
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 08:11:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Which 2.4.19 kernel package did you install and what is the exact
> error message?
2.4.19-k7.
As for the BIOS message, I will look it up when I get to the machine the
next time. It may take a day or two though. Anyway, that m
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 08:11:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Which 2.4.19 kernel package did you install and what is the exact
> error message?
The "error" message is:
BIOS data check successful
Interestingly the very same message is printed my my manually installed
2.4.18 ke
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 07:40:23PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> The "error" message is:
>
> BIOS data check successful
That message comes from LILO. It sounds as if you've got a
boot loader problem that is triggered by the Debian kernels.
See if you can get it to load by removing the initr
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 21:37:06 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> I've configured and built the kernel, using gcc-2.95,
I've not followed 2.5 development, but I'd suspect the recommended compiler
for building it ought to be gcc 3.2 or 3.3 rather than 2.95 by now - check
Turn on virtual terminal support...
Chris
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 09:37:06PM +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> When booting, grub seems to find it, uncompress it, then it says 'OK,
> booting the kernel' and nothing more. It just hangs. I don't see the
> line announcing the kernel version or compiler etc.
CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE=y
Milan
* Mark Shuttleworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030427 16:59]:
> I've configured and built the kernel, using gcc-2.95, make bzImage and
> modules, installed modules under /lib/modules/2.5.68. Everything goes
> fine except for a bunch of depmod errors during the 'make
>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 06:45:42PM -0400, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> * Mark Shuttleworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030427 16:59]:
> > I've configured and built the kernel, using gcc-2.95, make bzImage and
> > modules, installed modules under /lib/modules/2.5.68. Everything g
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 12:40:28AM +0200, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 09:37:06PM +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> > When booting, grub seems to find it, uncompress it, then it says 'OK,
> > booting the kernel' and nothing more. It just hangs.
I compiled and ran the debian kernel-source-2.5.69 package. It boots OK,
however, none of he modutil functions work. I keep getting the following
error message: "QM_MODULES: Function not implemented" whenever I try things
such as insmod, lsmod, or depmod. I suspect the source fo
tion files for linux-image-2.6.17-2-686 ...
Running postrm hook script /usr/sbin/update-grub.
Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub
Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst
Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ...
Found ker
Has anyone looked into packaging the Openwall patches for the kernel? Their
licensing is kosher. If nobody else steps up, I'll probably do it.
--
- mdz
Hi,
I am running the latest sid and I'm trying to compile a custom 2.0.38
kernel for use with smalllinux on an ancient PS/2 386 with 4 megs of RAM.
(The default won't do because it doesn't have support for ESDI drives.)
Anyway, I'm running into a problem. I can't s
ending the
"7E" 's We believe that it's originating from the Kernel.
Anyone encountered this before ?
Any Direction or Thoughts would be greatly
Appreciated.
---This has been a
Communiqué fromhis Imperial Majesty Admiral
Thrawn.---[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *5* Does anyone know if nfs-root can be in the standard-kernel
> without problem to boot from harddisk? I have not suceeded but then
> there were other problems to and I had little time...
On Linux, EtherBoot is able to load an init
Quoting Matthias Berse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> expand vanilla-debian kernels for let's say xfs. Since the
> kernel-source package is rather large compared to the usual
> kernel-to-kernel patch why do not provide a kernel-patch packet which
> can patch the kernel up do date?
I th
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 02:26:20PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
>
> Quoting Matthias Berse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > expand vanilla-debian kernels for let's say xfs. Since the
> > kernel-source package is rather large compared to the usual
> > kernel-to-kern
Hi,
Quoting Matthias Berse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> No, I mean a way to go from let's say kernel-source-2.4.3 to
> kernel-source-2.4.4 without the need to download the whole big .deb,
> but a patch similar to those patches found on kernel.org, but as a
> debian package whic
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 02:41:46PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Matthias Berse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > No, I mean a way to go from let's say kernel-source-2.4.3 to
> > kernel-source-2.4.4 without the need to download the whole big .deb,
> &
Matthias Berse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I mean a way to go from let's say kernel-source-2.4.3 to
> kernel-source-2.4.4 without the need to download the whole big .deb,
There's no point in doing that as you can always maintain your own upstream
kernel source by
On a Debian 3.0 (testing) system updated to binutils 2.11.92.0.12.3-4,
I get a failure when trying to compile a 2.4.17 kernel. The last part
of the transcript is enclosed.
ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux-2.4.17/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext
arch/i386/kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_task.o
Klaus Ethgen writes:
> Background: The glibc in lenny is compiled to be incompatible with
> kernels lower than 2.6. I do not know if there are options to use newer
> glibc with older kernels.
There is other software in lenny that isn't built to be compatible with
older kernels as well. For exam
Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Just to bring that back to discussion:
>
> With lenny the provided glibc seems to be incompatible to kernel 2.4.
> There are many systems out there still running with kernel 2.4 cause
> stability. (My servers which needs to be stable all run Kernel 2.4.)
s/le
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 05:26:30PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> With lenny the provided glibc seems to be incompatible to kernel 2.4.
The Linux 2.4 support ended with the Etch release. Even for Etch it is
only supported for upgrades.
> Is there any scenario what happens to such system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am So den 1. Feb 2009 um 18:57 schrieb Luk Claes:
> > With lenny the provided glibc seems to be incompatible to kernel 2.4.
> > There are many systems out there still running with kernel 2.4 cause
> > stability. (My servers which
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 23:31 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Am So den 1. Feb 2009 um 18:57 schrieb Luk Claes:
> > > With lenny the provided glibc seems to be incompatible to kernel 2.4.
> > > There are many system
I've finally gotten around to making a simple skeleton for packaging
kernel modules. When I have some more free time I'll expand it a bit
and write some documentation to go with it. Oh, and I might test it
since it's currently completely untested :).
Anyway, for the interested t
I apologize profusely for this posting. Here it goes again. Before I get
started, yes, I have read the nice mail from Linux about the kernel headers,
and I have respectfully read the many emails I have received on this topic
from thoughtful developers. But I am still confused. I am sorry, but
I was subscribed to linux kernel. I haven't received anything since Dec. 29. I
have tried resubscribing several times. I even resent the original subscrition
that got me started. I keep getting emails back saying user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist. Can anyone help me on
this? I
I downloaded the kernel-source_2.0.33-7.deb package and installed it on my
1.3.1r6 system. (I needed the fat32 patch). I now understand why I had
trouble patching kernel sources from .deb packages, because they have
already been patched, so patch tried to REMOVE the patch instead of
INSTALLING
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 07:42:27AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded the sources for the 2.0.34 kernel and did a quick look through
> the files. The fat-32 patches do not seem to be in here. If 2.0.34 is to
> be released as a debian package, then I hope all of the patches
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded the sources for the 2.0.34 kernel and did a quick look through
> the files. The fat-32 patches do not seem to be in here. If 2.0.34 is to
> be released as a debian package, then I hope all of the patches that are in
> the 2.
"Bob" == Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> conclude that it probably is there (maybe in a different form
Bob> than the patches).
Bob> As usual, the documentation lags the code, of course.
The documentation is off on Alan Cox's site -- it seems you have to
activate NLS support and UTF8
k */
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded the sources for the 2.0.34 kernel and did a quick look through
> the files. The fat-32 patches do not seem to be in here. If 2.0.34 is to
> be released as a debian package, then I hope all of the patches that are in
> th
r the kernel source maintainer to take the 'official'
kernel sources from Linus and then apply what ever current patches that are
deemed good for debian to create a custom kernel source package. I assume
that the debian kernel source package for 2.0.34 will be placed in slink
event
I'm looking for information on how to setup for kernel debugging.
Any help?
Well, kernel 2.0.35 does not support some series of 2940UW (not Ultra and
not Wide both are supported). There is some solution for use it but i think
some ppl who want to use slink wont know it, so i think we have to write a
little README. If i'm right and you want, letme write that readme
Hi
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:34, Richard Fojta wrote:
> Hi,
> I've recently try to install new kernel. Somethings go wrong and I cannot
> found solution. There is some problem with configuration. It seems to me,
> that this problem is not unique. Does anybody know how to solve ti?
I've had the same experience yesterday, i didn't have time, so i downgraded to
2.6.12.
But there's something wrong with the kernel.
Greetings,
Gasper Zejn
On Thursday 15 of December 2005 13:23, Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:34, Richard Fojta
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Zejn Gasper wrote:
> I've had the same experience yesterday, i didn't have time, so i downgraded
> to
> 2.6.12.
>
> But there's something wrong with the kernel.
Others wrote:
> >
> > Waiting 2 seconds /sys/
Hi,
I have a box with Sid with the latest upgrades, (almost cause
dist-upgrade wants to remove a lot of stuff)
Anyway, fact is that I can't compile any kernel on the Linus tree. This,
for more than a month.
Could anyone please help me find out which package is the broken one?
/b
Hi Everybody,
Who has taken over from Bruce as the kernel source package
maintainer?
I have taken over from Ian M as ppp package maintainer and I would
very much like to coordinate with them to update the kernel ppp code
with the latest versions from the ppp-2.2.0c ppp release?
The files in
Bruce Perens writes ("kernel crisis?"):
> I have a problem here. The binary interface of the 1.3.x kernel is
> diverging from the 1.2.13 system to the extent that it's difficult to
> keep one binary system that runs both kernels.
This is clearly a Bad Thing. In a way it
Ian Jackson writes:
>
> Bruce Perens writes ("kernel crisis?"):
> > I have a problem here. The binary interface of the 1.3.x kernel is
> > diverging from the 1.2.13 system to the extent that it's difficult to
> > keep one binary system that runs both ker
I noticed that we do not use the kernel packages of the debian project in
our school. Every machine still compiles ones own kernel.
I thought about the reasons for it. Having the packages would be much
easier to handle I guess:
1. Kernel packages are not up to date and kept bug free. There is a
Hi all,
There is a new tool available for Linux maintainers: Kernel ABI Tracker
(http://upstream-tracker.org/kernel/).
This tool looks for new releases of the Linux kernel, builds them and
tracks API/ABI changes using a set of basic tools: ABI Dumper and ABI
Compliance Checker. The tool is
iled as a module.
> So it does not work for people compiling their own kernel and not
> using modules (when you tailor your kernel for a given machine,
> modules are just slowing the boot process and do not bring anything).
Unless under very specific circumstances, the use of a m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bertrand Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fglrx-kernel-modules
Version : 1:8-4-1
Upstream Author : ATI/AMD
* URL : http://ati.amd.com/support/drivers/linux/linux-radeon.html
* License : restricted
Descr
Hi,
[Please follow up on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The postinst script of the kernel image packages is huge -- but
then, it comes from a tradition of a postinst that would ask you if you
wanted to put the new kernel on a boot floppy, format and initialize a
new floppy, and create a
Package: kernel-package
Version: 2.03
I have kernel-source-2.0.6 installed (which patches cleanly with Linus'
patches for more recent kernels) and used to role my kernels with the scripts
from the kernel-source package, eg
cd /usr/src/linux
make xc
reopen 505609
reassign 505609 linux-2.6
affects 505609 lilo
thanks
Stephen Powell wrote:
> The real question is, "Why didn't the map installer get run during
> the kernel upgrade?"
[...]
> So is this a bug in the kernel maintainer scripts? Or is it a feature?
> I don&
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Doug Torrance
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, dtorra...@piedmont.edu
* Package name: macaulay2-jupyter-kernel
Version : 0.6.7~beta
Upstream Author : Radoslav Zlatev
* URL : https://github.com/rz839/Macaulay2-Jupyter
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luk Claes
* Package name: softiwarp-kernel
Version : ??
Upstream Author : Bernard Metzler
* URL : https://gitorious.org/softiwarp/kernel
* License : GPL-2 or BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Soft-iWARP
ion can't compile all the drivers in kernel 2.4.21. Which version
>
> Which drivers and what errors do you get? If you tell us the errors then we
> can get them fixed.
I get lots of warning (i.e. variable fb isn't used in aty182 driver). I
don't get these warnings when I use
e answers.
>
> 'linux' is a perfect name for the package. The tarballs contain that very
> name.
Note that the name is choosen not only to attract the user, but also to
catch that who blindly use "apt-get source linux". The user wouldn't get
the well-known and go
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joseph Nahmias
* Package name: octave-kernel
Version : 0.31.1
Upstream Author : Steven Silvester
* URL : https://github.com/calysto/octave_kernel
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Jupyter
Hi,
considering that Adrian Bunk announced long time support for kernel
2.6.27 (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/743377) wouldn't it
be a good idea to take kernel 2.6.27 as the stable kernel in lenny?
PJ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
> Since it is a moving target, kernel compilation is a difficult
> subject that may confuse even the most admired developer:
> [Debian Reference]
What is the status of initrd kernel building process (only on i386),
while using stock kernels (from kernel.org)?
Kern
I just upgraded to the current Sarge and also got GCC 3.3. It seems this
version can't compile all the drivers in kernel 2.4.21. Which version
should I use? And how do I set this version (Environment variable?)
without deinstalling GCC 3.3?
O. Wyss
--
See "http://wxguide.sourceforge.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:44:17AM +0100, Cyril Jaquier wrote:
Why do not the linux-source-2.6.* packages provide linux-kernel-headers?
First of all, linux-kernel-headers has been replaced by linux-libc-dev.
But either way, the answer is the same: those packages install them in
/usr/include
First of all, linux-kernel-headers has been replaced by linux-libc-dev.
Ok. But linux-kernel-headers is still a virtual package. Isn't it?
But either way, the answer is the same: those packages install them in
/usr/include, which is unpacked and accessible to any program being
com
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:08:21AM +, Cyril Jaquier wrote:
>
> >First of all, linux-kernel-headers has been replaced by linux-libc-dev.
>
> Ok. But linux-kernel-headers is still a virtual package. Isn't it?
no, it doesn't exists anymore. ll-dev provides it to a
I tried to upgrade the 2.2 kernel from Woody to 2.4.22 and installed
kernel-image-2.4.22. During installation a large text but barely
interpretable text about initrd.img is shown. Why can't the install make
a fully correct lilo.conf by itself? Besides the text is wrong instead
of &q
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 13:59, Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This problem has already bitten several skilled Debian developers at
> > various times. Given the problems that are caused for such skilled
> > people as a result of this I hate to imagine the consequences for typical
> > users!
> This problem has already bitten several skilled Debian developers at various
> times. Given the problems that are caused for such skilled people as a
> result of this I hate to imagine the consequences for typical users!
But typical users wont be building custom kernels with ACL patches, will
1 - 100 of 2014 matches
Mail list logo
