On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 08:55:31AM +0200, Joël Krähemann wrote:
On gum, 2014-09-26 at 11:28 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I noticed that you appear to be filing several RC bugs against packages
which use /bin/bash shebangs in their scripts.
These bugs are *not* RC. The packages
On gum, 2014-09-26 at 11:28 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that you appear to be filing several RC bugs against packages
which use /bin/bash shebangs in their scripts.
These bugs are *not* RC. The packages themselves do not have security
issues. The interpreter they choose to
On Freitag, 26. September 2014, Jakub Wilk wrote:
I was once accused of doing an unannounced MBF after filing a single
bug. : It's not necessarily the bug volume that triggers anti-MBF
defence mechanisms in developers.
lol / wow!
/me giggles
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Hi,
I noticed that you appear to be filing several RC bugs against packages
which use /bin/bash shebangs in their scripts.
These bugs are *not* RC. The packages themselves do not have security
issues. The interpreter they choose to use {may,does}, but that is not a
bug in grep, xz-utils or gzip.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am Fr den 26. Sep 2014 um 11:28 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
I noticed that you appear to be filing several RC bugs against packages
which use /bin/bash shebangs in their scripts.
Only against that 3 tools that most likely are also used from
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 11:36 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Am Fr den 26. Sep 2014 um 11:28 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
I noticed that you appear to be filing several RC bugs against packages
which use /bin/bash shebangs in their scripts.
Only against that 3 tools that most likely are also used
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Fr den 26. Sep 2014 um 12:05 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
I don't think that 3 bugs are mass bug filling. I manually checked
where such a bug report is needed.
There were three bugs within 20 minutes or so; I assumed that more were
coming. If
* Klaus Ethgen kl...@ethgen.de, 2014-09-26, 11:36:
I don't think that 3 bugs are mass bug filling. I manually checked
where such a bug report is needed.
I was once accused of doing an unannounced MBF after filing a single
bug. : It's not necessarily the bug volume that triggers anti-MBF
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
bug in grep, xz-utils or gzip.
Only against that 3 tools that most likely are also used from network
For what it’s worth, OpenBSD/MirBSD have BSD-licenced
implementations of tools like zgrep, zless, etc. that
can be used (with s/gzip/xz/g) for xz as
On 09/26/2014 02:39 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
For what it’s worth, OpenBSD/MirBSD have BSD-licenced
implementations of tools like zgrep, zless, etc. that
can be used (with s/gzip/xz/g) for xz as well.
these utilities should not be in any compressor specific package int he
first place, see
10 matches
Mail list logo
