Cyril Brulebois writes ("Re: Modified http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper to
mention non-packagers (Re: [CTTE #614907] Resolution of node/nodejs conflict)"):
> Ian Jackson (26/07/2012):
> > Uploaders needs to be abolished in favour of multiple
> > Mainta
Ian Jackson (26/07/2012):
> Uploaders needs to be abolished in favour of multiple
> Maintainers. In wheezy perhaps ?
I'm pretty sure the answer is no.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 18:54 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 03:29 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
...
> > We also need a general word for "someone involved with Debian in a
> > positive way". "Participant" is clumsy; "member of the community"
> > even more so. "Person" might do but word with a mor
On 07/26/2012 03:29 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Developer, DD
> As per the constitution; includes non-uploading DDs.
> New Maintainer needs to be renamed to New Developer.
>
> [Non-]Uploading Developer
> To distinguish where necessary, but usually we can use
> Sponsor instea
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Heh, like that's going to work in Debian. What we could do though is
> try harder to use the nouns we do have more consistently.
Heh, like that's going to work in Debian.
;-)
Actually I do think introducing new _and better/good_ terms wor
On 07/26/2012 08:37 AM, The Fungi wrote:
> On 2012-07-26 14:29:14 +0100 (+0100), Ian Jackson wrote:
> [...]
>> We also need a general word for "someone involved with Debian in a
>> positive way". "Participant" is clumsy; "member of the community"
>> even more so. "Person" might do but word with a m
On 2012-07-26 14:29:14 +0100 (+0100), Ian Jackson wrote:
[...]
> We also need a general word for "someone involved with Debian in a
> positive way". "Participant" is clumsy; "member of the community"
> even more so. "Person" might do but word with a more positive spin
> would be nice.
As a long-ti
Andrey Rahmatullin writes ("Re: Modified http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper
to mention non-packagers (Re: [CTTE #614907] Resolution of node/nodejs
conflict)"):
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:55:06PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I am not in favour of this change. The p
Jon Dowland writes ("Re: Modified http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper to
mention non-packagers (Re: [CTTE #614907] Resolution of node/nodejs conflict)"):
> I'm not overly interested in the word developer being eradicated, but at
> the very least having some consistency
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:55:06PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > We are in the process of discussing a variety of constitutional amendments
> > > to be raised by the tech-ctte that will hopefully end up creating a sort
> > > of bundle of constitutional fixes to vote on. Perhaps it would be good
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:55:06PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jon Dowland writes ("Re: Modified http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper to
> mention non-packagers (Re: [CTTE #614907] Resolution of node/nodejs
> conflict)"):
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:15:15AM
Jon Dowland writes ("Re: Modified http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper to
mention non-packagers (Re: [CTTE #614907] Resolution of node/nodejs conflict)"):
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:15:15AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > We are in the process of discussing a variet
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:15:15AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> We are in the process of discussing a variety of constitutional amendments
> to be raised by the tech-ctte that will hopefully end up creating a sort
> of bundle of constitutional fixes to vote on. Perhaps it would be good to
> includ
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:00:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes, as the new wording is logically inconsistent. *By definition* a Debian
> Project Member, as the term is being used here, is someone who has voting
> rights. The term "Debian Developer" was being used to distinguish between
> p
Le Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:20:47AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
>
> Personally I don't think we need separate terms for voting member with
> uploading rights and those without such rights; in the few cases where
> the difference matters, it's easier (I think also better) to spell it
> out rathe
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:15:15AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:49:06AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>
> >> Our constitution does not talk about project members, and instead uses
> >> the word "developer".
>
> > In fact, the Constitution
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:49:06AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> Our constitution does not talk about project members, and instead uses
>> the word "developer".
> In fact, the Constitution uses interchangeably "member" and "developer".
> (And that is one of the ba
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:49:06AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Our constitution does not talk about project members, and instead uses
> the word "developer".
In fact, the Constitution uses interchangeably "member" and "developer".
(And that is one of the basis for the slow shift towards "membe
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:00:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes, as the new wording is logically inconsistent. *By definition* a Debian
> Project Member, as the term is being used here, is someone who has voting
> rights. The term "Debian Developer" was being used to distinguish between
> p
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 09:43:05AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:23:50AM +0200, Ulrich Dangel a écrit :
> > >From http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper:
> > A Debian developer (DD) is a Debian Project Member who has uploading rights.
> this page (and probably others)
Thread broken as topic changes.
In-Reply-To: <500f3c96.90...@spamt.net>
Le Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:23:50AM +0200, Ulrich Dangel a écrit :
>
> >From http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper:
> A Debian developer (DD) is a Debian Project Member who has uploading rights.
Hi Ulrich,
this page (and pr
21 matches
Mail list logo
