Timshel Knoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Possible solutions:
4. Fix libtool and libltdl to support
lt_dlopen_interface (const char *name, int interface)
and use that.
This would require modifying libtool to install a versioned .la
files (on archs that can't just dlopen a
Timshel Knoll wrote:
[Please CC all replies to me]
Hi all,
I'm having issues with getting parted's reiserfs support to work in a
way that complies with Debian policy. The issue is that parted dlopen()s
libreiserfs.so and libdal.so (from the libreiserfs-0.3-{0,dev}
packages) for its reiserfs
Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 04:01:29PM +1100, Andrew Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:02:12AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
I don't see why this is a problem, you'd only need to change the
dlopen() code if there's a SONAME change
[CC to -policy removed, prolly is getting a little OT for them ...]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:06:31PM +0300, Yury Umanets wrote:
2. Make parted dlopen() libreiserfs-0.3.so.0 rather than libreiserfs.so.
This will solve the problem, but is not ideal solution since a minor
version upgrade or
Timshel Knoll wrote:
[CC to -policy removed, prolly is getting a little OT for them ...]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:06:31PM +0300, Yury Umanets wrote:
2. Make parted dlopen() libreiserfs-0.3.so.0 rather than libreiserfs.so.
This will solve the problem, but is not ideal solution since a minor
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:26:14AM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
1. Put the .so symlinks in the libreiserfs-0.3-0 package. This breaks
policy (section 9.0 says that the associated development package
should contain the shared library without a version number). This is
also a really bad
[Please CC all replies to me]
Hi all,
I'm having issues with getting parted's reiserfs support to work in a
way that complies with Debian policy. The issue is that parted dlopen()s
libreiserfs.so and libdal.so (from the libreiserfs-0.3-{0,dev}
packages) for its reiserfs support. This is fine,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:26:14AM +1100, Timshel Knoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
2. Make parted dlopen() libreiserfs-0.3.so.0 rather than libreiserfs.so.
This will solve the problem, but is not ideal solution since a minor
version upgrade or SONAME change of libreiserfs will
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 00:26, Timshel Knoll wrote:
I'm having issues with getting parted's reiserfs support to work in a
way that complies with Debian policy. The issue is that parted dlopen()s
libreiserfs.so and libdal.so (from the libreiserfs-0.3-{0,dev}
packages) for its reiserfs support.
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:02:12AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
I don't see why this is a problem, you'd only need to change the
dlopen() code if there's a SONAME change - and that should only change
if there's a binary-incompatible difference. A difference that might
not be picked up by
Hi again,
I forgot to mention: what if a backward-compatible API change is
made to libreiser?
libtool library versioning is designed to deal with all of this...
can we use it somehow?
Cheers,
Andrew
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 04:01:29PM +1100, Andrew Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:02:12AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
I don't see why this is a problem, you'd only need to change the
dlopen() code if there's a SONAME change - and that should only
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:16:44AM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote:
So reiserfs has an internal mechanism for reporting whether stuff
is really compatible?
Yes. An internal version numbers policy. You call a function
(via dlsym) asking if the interface you (i.e. parted) is using,
and reiserfs
13 matches
Mail list logo
