Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Jun 22, Galen Hazelwood wrote
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Nope. What happens is most (single-cpu) developers upload the source
and binaries for one architecture. Then helpful and nice developers who
own other machines upload binaries for their cpu, built from the
Hmm. While there are *particular* problems doing 32-64 bit cross
compilation, doing any 32-32 compilation is probably *quite* solid.
(In particular, compilers targeting the 68k are probably *better* than
the x86 native compiler -- because we've [we==Cygnus] actually had a
lot of paying 68k
-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GCC cross-compilation
Michael Meskes wrote:
Does this mean I could upload all architecture version for my packages?
If so yes, I think it's useful.
Michael
Well, I personally distrust cross-compilers...at least gcc cross
compilers. I know
Well, I personally distrust cross-compilers...at least gcc cross
compilers. I know that at least one crossover (i386-alpha) has been
known to produce broken binaries at one time,
In that case, 32/64 bit stuff has been the cause...
Since you can't actually test the cross-compiled programs
On Tue, Jun 24, 1997 at 10:55:09AM +0200, Roman Hodek wrote:
I use cross-compiling most of the time for m68k, just because the
Intel machines are much faster... But I test the resulting packages on
the 68k machine :-) In that case, I think there's nothing to say
against cross-compiling...
Mark Eichin wrote:
Hmm. While there are *particular* problems doing 32-64 bit cross
compilation, doing any 32-32 compilation is probably *quite* solid.
(In particular, compilers targeting the 68k are probably *better* than
the x86 native compiler -- because we've [we==Cygnus] actually had a
Empfängers ist unbekannt.
Subject: Re: GCC cross-compilation
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
It occurred to
me that since most of the Debian packages
are also available for m68k and also
Sparc and Alpha now, the develops are probably
using cross-compilation, rather
Does this mean I could upload all architecture version for my
packages? If so yes, I think it's useful.
But if you do that, you haven't tested whether your package is really
running on another architecture...
Roman
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
Michael Meskes wrote:
Does this mean I could upload all architecture version for my packages?
If so yes, I think it's useful.
Michael
Well, I personally distrust cross-compilers...at least gcc cross
compilers. I know that at least one crossover (i386-alpha) has been
known to produce
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
It occurred to
me that since most of the Debian packages
are also available for m68k and also
Sparc and Alpha now, the develops are probably
using cross-compilation, rather than actually
owning all these machines.
Nope. What happens
10 matches
Mail list logo
