Re: Ratifying the constitution

> Buddha Buck writes ("Re: Ratifying the constitution "): > ... > ... > > Out of curiosity, how formal does a proposed amendment have to be. I > > mean, will this work for an amendment proposal? (And if so, I'd like > > to propose

Re: Ratifying the constitution

Buddha Buck writes ("Re: Ratifying the constitution "): ... > That's not what it means. It means that in order for an amendment to > automatically be accepted, you need to convince 6 people, Guy and the > five seconds. > > If they don't like it, you can force

Re: Ratifying the constitution

(I've now caught up on debian-devel, barring my 7 articles marked to return, of which this was one ...) Guy Maor writes on the 10th of September: > Yes, let's. > > I am formally proposing version 0.8 of the constitution as given in >