Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that
> we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's
> using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've written
> scripts which I use under mod_perl and the time difference is
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 04:56:29PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that
> > we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's
> > using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've writt
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Anthony,
>
> Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that
> we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's
> using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've written
> script
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Anthony,
> >
> > Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that
> > we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's
> >
4 matches
Mail list logo