Re: PERL: patch for glibc 2.1

1998-10-06 Thread Darren Stalder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Matt McLean, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: >this is necessary since the semun union is no longer in the libc. its been >awhile since your last perl upload, and newer versions have come out.. are >you still alive? :-) I thought I'd be able to have

Re: PERL: patch for glibc 2.1

1998-10-06 Thread Matt McLean
On 5 Oct 1998, Darren Stalder wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Matt McLean, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: > >this is necessary since the semun union is no longer in the libc. its been > >awhile since your last perl upload, and newer versions have come out.. are > >y

Re: PERL: patch for glibc 2.1

1998-10-06 Thread Dan Jacobowitz
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 05:19:51PM -0700, Darren Stalder wrote: > Matt McLean, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: > >this is necessary since the semun union is no longer in the libc. its been > >awhile since your last perl upload, and newer versions have come out.. are > >you still alive

Re: PERL: patch for glibc 2.1

1998-10-07 Thread Darren/Torin/Who Ever...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Matt McLean, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: >It's no longer needed. 5.00502 now has a configure test for union semun. Cool. I thought I had seen that but I figured that I'd leave it for people that track that much closer. >I know what's going on

Re: PERL: patch for glibc 2.1

1998-10-07 Thread Dan Jacobowitz
On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 01:34:42AM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote: > >I know what's going on with IPC, and I'm guessing the DBM test is failing > >because of a bug in the libc. > > So, what's going on with IPC? IPC until very recently was completely hosed on powerpc. We have hopes that a