On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 06:21, Brian May wrote:
I suspect this is a more general problem with apt-get that it assumes
that if two versions of the same package are available from different
sources, then both packages will be exactly the same. As such, it will
always use the Packages entry from
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:36:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
The pins are used to determine which of all the available versions for
the package are candidates for installation, in Ludovic's case both the
woody and unstable versions are candidates (both have pin now).
In my case,
Le mercredi 21 août 2002 à 13:28:30, Brian May a écrit:
Hello,
Hi,
I have just being playing around with apt-proxy, and noticed something
weird. Every time I run apt-get, it wants to upgrade the packages it
just upgraded 5 seconds ago (it only happens on this computer, too):
[..]
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:50:21PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
The entires in Packages files and those in the .deb must match exactly
(ie byte for byte), otherwise it sees them as different packages. Since
dpkg manipulates the status file and only has information from the .deb
there is no
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:50:21PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
The entires in Packages files and those in the .deb must match exactly
(ie byte for byte), otherwise it sees them as different packages. Since
dpkg manipulates the status file and only
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:19:13PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
apt-get knows that it has to get the file from:
deb http://snoopy.apana.org.au/~ftp/debian woody main
and the md5sum of the Packages file from this source, as quoted
before matches exactly.
Er, the md5sum of the deb
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:19:13PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
apt-get knows that it has to get the file from:
deb http://snoopy.apana.org.au/~ftp/debian woody main
and the md5sum of the Packages file from this source, as quoted
before
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:18:09AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
If you do apt-cache show kerberos4kth1 after installing and look very
carefully you will see that the two listed 1.1-11-2 stanzas are subtly
different. The problem is that your package file does not
accurately reflect the
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
I ran dpkg-scanpackages on it myself, and haven't updated anything
since (besides, if I had updated something, the MD5sum check would fail
wouldn't it?)
Nope.
Description: Dummy library package for Kerberos4 From KTH.
This is a dummy package. It
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:44:54PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
Description: Dummy library package for Kerberos4 From KTH.
This is a dummy package. It should be safe to remove it.
installed-size: 76
source: krb4
If you mean the spacing is different, that is my fault (I use vim in
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
Can't apt realize that if it is going to install a package from source
X, it should use the Packages entry from source X too?
The entires in Packages files and those in the .deb must match exactly
(ie byte for byte), otherwise it sees them as different
11 matches
Mail list logo
