Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Brendan == Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brendan Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some Brendan modules which were previously stand-alone, any package Brendan declaring a versioned[0] dependency on: Brendan libcgi-perl, Brendan needs to either have the

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-26 Thread Jérôme Marant
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which still depend on perlapi-5.6.*.

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-26 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 09:33:51AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote: Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency on:

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-26 Thread Jérôme Marant
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:57:50PM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote: If those package are still going to be shipped separately (because they're going to evolve outside the perl core), then they should stay in the archive and perl must add Provides for them. Hence, the user can still choose

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Steve Kowalik
At 11:06 am, Sunday, August 25 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh mumbled: On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Brendan O'Dea wrote: Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency on:

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Steve Kowalik wrote: If they depend on those packages and perl (= 5.8.0)? If they have any sort of versioned dependency on provides (we should make a list of those), actually. But since this is a non-local check, and hard to write, I guess tailoring it to detect

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account those packages that were

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Joey Hess
Brendan O'Dea wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account those

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea écrivait: On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which still depend on

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Joey Hess
Raphael Hertzog wrote: What happened to libdbi-perl ? Joey NMUed it in the pool, but it appears to not have been installed. Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild. -- see shy jo

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Clint Adams
Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild. Yes, two newer MU's actually. The latter was a rebuild for 5.8; unfortunately the build-deps weren't updated, so it was autobuilt inconsistently.

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 01:51:18PM -0400, Clint Adams écrivait: Maybe a newer MU came out in between or something. I don't have the NMU anymore, but IIRC it was a simple rebuild. Yes, two newer MU's actually. The latter was a rebuild for 5.8; unfortunately the build-deps weren't updated,

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Ryan Murray
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 07:39:54PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:44:00AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea ?crivait: On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can make testing though, we have to

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 01:33:36PM -0700, Ryan Murray écrivait: while the build-depends on perl were updated, the build-depends for the new libdbi were not. You need to update all build-depends that might be They were in 1.28-1.1 (NMU by Joey), but during the transition the maintainer uploaded

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-24 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:49:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: perl 5.8 will enter unstable at the next dinstall run. Before it can make testing though, we have to update the following 84 packages which still depend on perlapi-5.6.*. This list should take into account those packages that were already

Re: perl 5.6 dependent packages

2002-08-24 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Brendan O'Dea wrote: Note that in addition, since perl 5.8.0 includes some modules which were previously stand-alone, any package declaring a versioned[0] dependency on: libdigest-md5-perl, libmime-base64-perl, libnet-perl, libtime-hires-perl,