On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 02:24:23AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:28:14PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I was going to make a large answer where i was going to denouse the
> > inexactitudes and false claims of this clearly inflamatory mail, but i will
> > refrain from
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:28:14PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> I was going to make a large answer where i was going to denouse the
> inexactitudes and false claims of this clearly inflamatory mail, but i will
> refrain from doing so.
> I wonder if Steve, and others of the 'esteemed' DDs, is follo
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:34:09PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-19 12:28]:
> > Anyway, Steve, please try to live up to your own standard, and cut
> > the ad-hominem attacks out in the future.
>
> Describing the situation as it is perceived by many peo
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-19 12:28]:
> Anyway, Steve, please try to live up to your own standard, and cut
> the ad-hominem attacks out in the future.
Describing the situation as it is perceived by many people doesn't
really count as ad-hominem attacks. Maybe for once you should l
Well,
I was going to make a large answer where i was going to denouse the
inexactitudes and false claims of this clearly inflamatory mail, but i will
refrain from doing so.
I wonder if Steve, and others of the 'esteemed' DDs, is following his own
advice, and rereading the mails he writes, and if
As much as I'd love to see this thread die, I think the superficially
reasonable (but actually quite ridiculous) suggestion of using killfiles
should be addressed.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 01:41:42PM +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> On 17/03/2006 Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > pe, 2006-03-17 kello 14:46 +11
6 matches
Mail list logo
